Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry最新文献

{"title":"Las Anotaciones de Herrera a Garcilaso como texto polémico: Aspectos materiales, editoriales y autoriales / Herrera's Anotaciones to Garcilaso as a Polemical Text: Material, Editorial and Authorial Aspects","authors":"J. Montero","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0001","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Herrera's commented edition of Garcilaso de la Vega's works advances an innovative formula in comparison to El Brocense's edition in material and editorial aspects. Our analysis shows that with those innovations Herrera strove to underscore his authorial role (against Garcilaso and El Brocense) and his attempt to hijack the leadership of Spanish letters with the help of the group of Seville learned men who supported him. Under his nationalist discourse lurks, therefore, controversy and the rivalry between regional groups (Andalusians against Castilians) and social tiers (men of letters against nobles).resumen:La edición comentada de Garcilaso por Herrera propone una fórmula innovadora con respecto a la del Brocense en aspectos materiales y editoriales. El análisis muestra que tales innovaciones pretenden resaltar el papel autorial de Herrera—frente a Garcilaso y frente al Brocense—, así como su pretensión de asumir el liderazgo de las letras españolas, con el apoyo del grupo de literatos sevillanos que lo secundan. Bajo el discurso nacionalista del libro se esconde, por tanto, la polémica y el enfrentamiento entre grupos regionales (andaluces frente a castellanos) y estamentales (hombres de letras frente a caballeros).","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72473728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Poética y polémica en la poesía de Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola / Poetic and Polemic in Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola's Poetry","authors":"M. D'agostino","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0019","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola never took part in the polemic typical of his own time, but this attitude did not prevent him from expressing his disapproval of Góngora. Thus far critics have always thought that Bartolomé had not commented on the greatest literary scandal of that time: the Soledades. However, a more careful analysis of his texts highlights how Argensola fiercely criticized Gongora's poem, even stating—although in Horatian mode—that poetry had become a monster, referring precisely to the verses in which Góngora offers one of the best proves of his genius: the dedication to the Duke of Béjar.resumen:Bartolomé Leonardo de Argensola no participó en las \"batallas de plumas\" que se combatieron en su época, pero esto no le impidió expresar su desaprobación tanto de Lope como de Góngora. La crítica ha subrayado siempre que Bartolomé no llegó nunca a manifestarse sobre el mayor escándalo literario de la época: las Soledades. Sin embargo, una lectura más atenta de algunos de sus textos evidencia que el poeta aragonés juzgó severamente el poema gongorino, llegando a sostener, si bien more horaciano, que la poesía se había transformado en un monstruo, tomando como referencia precisamente los versos en que Góngora ofrece una de las pruebas más audaces de su genio poético: la dedicatoria al duque de Béjar.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89834598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Apolos, musas y Parnasos: La controversia sobre la distribución de las obras en los libros de poesías / Apollos, Muses, and Parnassus: The Controversy Surrounding Poem Distribution in Poetry Books","authors":"Manuel Ángel Candelas Colodrón","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0158","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0158","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The article pretends to narrate the process of enrichment of the Parnassus frame during the seventeenthcentury(until 1672) and to study the immediate impact of the decision of González de Salas or Quevedo to distributing his poems in nine muses among his contemporary poets. In particular, our study examines the decision of three poets that can be deemed peripheric, but that will cultivate this generic distinction, albeit not without some degree of controversy or reflection from Lisbon, Francisco Manuel de Melo; from Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; and from Cagliari (José Delitala).resumen:El artículo pretende historiar el proceso de enriquecimiento del marco parnaseo durante el siglo XVII (hasta 1672) y detenerme en el impacto inmediato de la decisión de González de Salas o de Quevedo de dividir sus poesías en nueve musas entre algunos poetas contemporáneos. En concreto, el trabajo se detendrá en tres poetas que pueden ser calificados como periféricos pero que van a cultivar esa distinción genérica, no sin controversia o reflexión, desde Lisboa, Francisco Manuel de Melo; desde Amsterdam, Miguel de Barrios; y desde Cagliari (José Delitala).","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84354182","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Góngora ante la tradición poética española: La invención gongorina al trasluz de Mena y Garcilaso / Góngora and the Spanish Poetic Tradition: Gongoresque Inventions in the Light of Mena and Garcilaso","authors":"Juan Manuel Daza","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0124","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.0124","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Góngora´s defenders on the debate about the Soledades held that the Cordoban poet had achieved that the Spanish poetic language equaled the greatness of Latin and therefore has reached its full maturity. This fact is the result of a progressive dignifying process in which Garcilaso and Mena had a crucial role, whose innovative wits were used as an example to justify Góngora´s innovation, even though Góngora´s superiority over his predecessors might be assumed.resumen:Los defensores de Góngora en el debate en torno a las Soledades sostuvieron que el poeta cordobés había conseguido que la lengua poética española igualara la grandeza del latín y, por tanto, alcanzara su plena madurez. Este hecho es resultado de un proceso de dignificación progresiva en el que tuvieron mucho peso Mena y Garcilaso, ingenios innovadores cuyo ejemplo se usó para justificar la innovación gongorina, aunque se asuma la superioridad de Góngora respecto a sus antecedentes.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84555904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nota Editorial / Editorial Note","authors":"J. Montero, Antonio Sánchez Jiménez","doi":"10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.000V","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CALIOPE.26.1.000V","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89021465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Routledge Research Companion to the Works of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz ed. by Emilie L. Bergmann and Stacey Schlau (review)","authors":"Sarah Finley","doi":"10.5325/caliope.26.1.0178","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.26.1.0178","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82155233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Guardians of Idolatry: God, Demons, and Priests in Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón's Treatise on the Heathen Superstitions by Viviana Díaz Balsera (review)","authors":"Justyna Olko","doi":"10.5325/caliope.26.1.0192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.26.1.0192","url":null,"abstract":"One of the most fascinating known works from colonial Mexico was penned by Hernando Ruiz de Alarcón, a devout priest deeply committed to extirpating idolatry among his parishioners in the town of Atenango del Río, in a remote mountainous region of Chilapa in the present state of Guerrero. His Tratado de supersticiones y costumbres gentílicas que oy viuen entre los indios naturales desta Nueva España (1629) has become a popular object of much scholarly scrutiny over the last several decades. Written in Spanish but containing ritual incantations in Nahuatl, it is a vivid testimony of the strength of preconquest beliefs, which survived despite more than one hundred years of Christianization efforts. The Nahuatl incantations recorded by Alarcón designate different beings and entities with names expressed in a very complex ritual language, often referring to deities and other sacred beings who were called forth in order to bring about the effects desired by the petitioners involved in the ritual. While there are numerous testimonies contradicting the Spanish propaganda—and an enduring academic myth!—regarding the success and efficiency of Christian instruction in colonial New Spain, Alarcón’s account of idolatrous practices and incantations, in fact salvaged by him from total erasure, attests to the integrity of indigenous ritual and worldview. This integrity, based on local ontology and epistemology, as argued by Díaz Balsera, is indeed retrievable despite having been forced into the repressive paradigm and ideological framework of a Spaniard who claimed religious and cultural superiority and saw the indigenous people as “recalcitrant backsliders” and “ hypocritical, cunning idolaters” (5). In what is undoubtedly a novelty in existing scholarship, the study by Díaz Balsera shows how Spaniards perceived, understood, and classified Mesoamerican practices according to their own ontological perspective and a discriminating colonial mindset. She examines the “demonological mindset of Spanish colonizers and ecclesiastics” as well as its roots in early modern Christian epistemology, permeated with beliefs in the “animated realm of the occult” (4). By probing this part of the European culture of the epoch, Díaz Balsera explains how these paradigms provided an essential lens for viewing and translating indigenous","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78805529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Los Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez y la academia burlesca de San Vicente en Sevilla / The Escolios contra Baptista Pérez and the burlesque academy of San Vicente in Seville: A Valentín Núñez Rivera","authors":"J. García","doi":"10.5325/caliope.25.2.0127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.25.2.0127","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez (c. 1594) is the shortened title of a burlesque work attributed to Juan Sáez de Zumeta, which remains unpublished in three known manuscripts. One of these, compiled by Porras de la Cámara, gives the news about the existence of the academy of San Vicente in Seville, where these Escolios were written. This article describes these testimonies and examines the structure of the piece and the different discursive modalities of the burlesque it shows. It also identifies the abovementioned academy with the burlesque literature produced in Seville in this period.resumen:Escolios contra Juan Baptista Pérez (c. 1594) es el título abreviado de una obra burlesca atribuida a Juan Sáez de Zumeta que permanece inédita en tres manuscritos conocidos. Uno de tales testimonios, compilado por Porras de la Cámara, ofrece en sus glosas la noticia de la academia de San Vicente en Sevilla, donde se originaron estos Escolios. Se describen los testimonios y se examinan la estructura del conjunto y las modalidades discursivas que lo integran. También se identifica la referida academia y se contextualiza en la producción burlesca de la Sevilla de entresiglos.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78896682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"El tratamiento literario de la causa inmaculista en La Aurora de Cristo (1616) de Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez / The Immaculate Conception in Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez’s La Aurora de Cristo (1616)","authors":"M. M. Navarro","doi":"10.5325/caliope.25.2.0208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.25.2.0208","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Even before Philip III created the Immaculate Conception Royal Committee in 1616, a fervent promotion and defense of the dogma of Virgin Mary’s Immaculate Conception were carried out, resulting in a series of poems of circumstance devoted to this doctrine that proliferated through the Baroque period. A sample of that intense literary activity is La Aurora de Cristo, a narrative epic poem written that same year by Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez, who was from Seville. This paper focuses on this work as a reflection of a moment of maximum apogee of the Marianist spirit lived in the Andalusian city.resumen:Antes de que Felipe III creara en 1616 una Real Junta de la Inmaculada, ya se llevaron a cabo una ferviente promoción y defensa del dogma de la Inmaculada Concepción de la Virgen, dando como fruto una serie de poemas de circunstancia sobre esta temática que fueron frecuentes durante todo el Barroco. Una muestra de aquella intensa actividad literaria es La Aurora de Cristo, un poema épico narrativo escrito en ese mismo año por el sevillano Luis de Belmonte Bermúdez, obra en la que centraremos este estudio como reflejo de un momento de máximo apogeo marianista en la capital hispalense.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81601126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"El Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos, en la fiesta de los santos Inacio de Loyola y Francisco Javier (1623), de Juan Antonio de Ibarra","authors":"I. Osuna","doi":"10.5325/caliope.25.2.0233","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5325/caliope.25.2.0233","url":null,"abstract":"abstract:Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos is a collection of poems from a poetic contest honoring Saint Ignatius of Loyola and Saint Francis Xavier, promoted in Seville by an influential corporation in the commercial field. Juan Antonio de Ibarra’s presentation of the poems in this collection has several meta-literary considerations. The celebration of the contest by the initiative of this civil corporation, several editorial details in the book or its author’s literary links and interests allows us to contextualize the prominence of this meta-literary component and its main purpose: the exaltation of current local poets, continuing with the brilliant trajectory in Seville.resumen:El Encomio de los ingenios sevillanos recoge un certamen poético en honor de san Ignacio de Loyola y san Francisco Javier, promovido en Sevilla por una influyente corporación en el ámbito comercial. Juan Antonio de Ibarra presenta los poemas dentro de un discurso con numerosas consideraciones metaliterarias. La celebración del certamen por iniciativa de esa corporación civil, varios detalles editoriales del libro o los contactos e intereses literarios de su autor permiten contextualizar el protagonismo de ese componente metaliterario y su principal propósito: la exaltación de los poetas locales del momento, en continuidad con la brillante trayectoria sevillana previa.","PeriodicalId":29842,"journal":{"name":"Caliope-Journal of the Society for Renaissance and Baroque Hispanic Poetry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77356409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}