{"title":"Using Student Learning Assessment Data to Drive Pedagogical Innovation and Quality in Higher Education: A Meta-Synthesis","authors":"Serafina Pastore","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70117","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hequ.70117","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The present article focuses on faculty members' use of student learning assessment data to drive pedagogical innovation. Fuelled by policy recommendations, the high-level commitment to assessment and data-based decision-making has proliferated in higher education contexts. However, evidence from the ground shows that these practices are still problematic. Given the relevant changes in policy and practice in higher education systems and the call for the ground-up re-development of assessment, a systematic review of qualitative studies has been performed. More specifically, this meta-synthesis considered 11 studies conducted in 4 English-speaking countries that outline the landscape of student learning assessment and data use literature over a 10-year period (2013–2022). Three main themes emerge from this study: namely, the pluralism of assessment practices and instruments; a (dis)connection between assessment practice, quality assurance, and the teaching-learning process; and the persistent concerns of faculty members about assessment and policy requirements. Implications for educational research and practice are discussed.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147568613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaisa Silvennoinen, Miika Marttunen, Heidi Hyytinen, Jani Ursin
{"title":"A Qualitative Study on Variation in the Written Argumentation of Finnish Final-Stage Undergraduate Students","authors":"Kaisa Silvennoinen, Miika Marttunen, Heidi Hyytinen, Jani Ursin","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70118","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Higher education students need generic skills such as written argumentation to succeed in their studies and in modern working life. However, research has shown that some students struggle with these skills even at later stages of higher education. We examined Finnish final-stage undergraduate students' argumentative texts (<i>n</i> = 200). Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the quality of written argumentation and its variation between students representing different higher education sectors (universities and universities of applied sciences). There was notable variation in the quality of written argumentation, distributed differently between the two higher education sectors. Overall, the quality of written argumentation was higher among university students. The practical implications of this are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70118","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unspeakability in Doctoral Supervision: Exploring Academic Taboos Through Metaphors in South Korea","authors":"Kyungmee Lee, Hackjung Kim, Dongil Kim","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although doctoral supervision is central to doctoral students' academic development and well-being, students' candid perspectives on advisory relationships often remain unspoken due to academic taboos surrounding critique of advisors. This study examines how doctoral students in South Korea perceive and navigate advisory relationships under conditions of academic unspeakability shaped by Confucian cultural norms and neoliberal academic pressures. Employing metaphor analysis, the study conceptualises metaphors as both a methodological tool and empirical data that enable indirect articulation of emotionally and politically sensitive experiences. Data were collected from an online survey of 406 doctoral students and four focus group interviews with 24 participants at a research-intensive Korean university. The findings show that doctoral students use metaphors to express a wide range of emotions toward their advisors, including admiration, disappointment, fear, neglect and ambivalence, with the same metaphors often carrying contradictory meanings. The study further reveals that doctoral students actively manage unspeakability through emotional reframing, relational calibration via <i>nunchi</i> (reading the room) and pragmatic compliance or instrumentalization. These strategies sustain advisory relationships while simultaneously reproducing conditions of silence. The study highlights unspeakability as a governing condition shaping doctoral subjectivity and emotional labour.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kaisa Silvennoinen, Miika Marttunen, Heidi Hyytinen, Jani Ursin
{"title":"A Qualitative Study on Variation in the Written Argumentation of Finnish Final-Stage Undergraduate Students","authors":"Kaisa Silvennoinen, Miika Marttunen, Heidi Hyytinen, Jani Ursin","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70118","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hequ.70118","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Higher education students need generic skills such as written argumentation to succeed in their studies and in modern working life. However, research has shown that some students struggle with these skills even at later stages of higher education. We examined Finnish final-stage undergraduate students' argumentative texts (<i>n</i> = 200). Qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the quality of written argumentation and its variation between students representing different higher education sectors (universities and universities of applied sciences). There was notable variation in the quality of written argumentation, distributed differently between the two higher education sectors. Overall, the quality of written argumentation was higher among university students. The practical implications of this are considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70118","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566459","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unspeakability in Doctoral Supervision: Exploring Academic Taboos Through Metaphors in South Korea","authors":"Kyungmee Lee, Hackjung Kim, Dongil Kim","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70119","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although doctoral supervision is central to doctoral students' academic development and well-being, students' candid perspectives on advisory relationships often remain unspoken due to academic taboos surrounding critique of advisors. This study examines how doctoral students in South Korea perceive and navigate advisory relationships under conditions of academic unspeakability shaped by Confucian cultural norms and neoliberal academic pressures. Employing metaphor analysis, the study conceptualises metaphors as both a methodological tool and empirical data that enable indirect articulation of emotionally and politically sensitive experiences. Data were collected from an online survey of 406 doctoral students and four focus group interviews with 24 participants at a research-intensive Korean university. The findings show that doctoral students use metaphors to express a wide range of emotions toward their advisors, including admiration, disappointment, fear, neglect and ambivalence, with the same metaphors often carrying contradictory meanings. The study further reveals that doctoral students actively manage unspeakability through emotional reframing, relational calibration via <i>nunchi</i> (reading the room) and pragmatic compliance or instrumentalization. These strategies sustain advisory relationships while simultaneously reproducing conditions of silence. The study highlights unspeakability as a governing condition shaping doctoral subjectivity and emotional labour.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70119","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Imagining the Future of Internationalisation in Higher Education: A Discourse Analysis of the Key Reports","authors":"Abdullah Bağcı","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70116","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hequ.70116","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As the internationalisation of higher education (IHE) evolves, there is a growing need to critically assess its guiding discourses and future directions. The study analyses two major internationalisation reports using categorical and critical discourse analysis to identify prevailing narratives and their alignment with both mainstream/neoliberal and critical frameworks. The findings reveal a continued emphasis on student mobility, business and industry demand and rankings, suggesting the enduring influence of the market-driven mainstream paradigm alongside emerging, though still secondary, themes of equity, inclusion and sustainability in alignment with critical internationalisation frameworks. These coexisting discourses and observed trends reflect a field in flux, marked by the dynamic interplay between established priorities and emerging critical agendas aimed at fostering a more equitable and sustainable future for internationalisation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147566081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Imagining the Future of Internationalisation in Higher Education: A Discourse Analysis of the Key Reports","authors":"Abdullah Bağcı","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70116","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>As the internationalisation of higher education (IHE) evolves, there is a growing need to critically assess its guiding discourses and future directions. The study analyses two major internationalisation reports using categorical and critical discourse analysis to identify prevailing narratives and their alignment with both mainstream/neoliberal and critical frameworks. The findings reveal a continued emphasis on student mobility, business and industry demand and rankings, suggesting the enduring influence of the market-driven mainstream paradigm alongside emerging, though still secondary, themes of equity, inclusion and sustainability in alignment with critical internationalisation frameworks. These coexisting discourses and observed trends reflect a field in flux, marked by the dynamic interplay between established priorities and emerging critical agendas aimed at fostering a more equitable and sustainable future for internationalisation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147565958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Employment and Employability at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): Perspectives of Undergraduate Students in Cambodia","authors":"Chealy Chet, Serey Sok, Chan Oeurn Chey, Leng Un, Veasna Sou, Chansopheak Keng, Chenda Our, Punleu Thou","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper has adopted an employability model introduced by the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) in 2004 to examine student employment at Cambodia's Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), focusing on the situation of employability during their studies and after graduation, as well as the antecedents of job capacity. The research is based on an online survey conducted among 482 students from 37 private and public universities across the nation. We also conducted key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, and a focus group discussion (FGD) for qualitative data. The research used Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and the Chi-square test for quantitative analysis, and we also adopted qualitative interpretation to explain and clarify the survey findings. The research reveals that HEIs have promoted access to knowledge, skills, and competencies in response to the demands of the job market. The research finds that the monthly salaries obtained by students during their studies are inadequate to hire employees with high job capacity. There is a negative relationship between job capacity and expected salaries after graduation. Students with low job capacity tend to expect a high monthly salary upon graduation. Competencies are a mediating research variable to job capacity. The students have access to university knowledge and experience from the workplace. The paper uses SEM to contribute to the literature on employability from Cambodia's HEIs, focusing on knowledge, skills, competencies, career development, and job capacity. In the future, policymakers, planners, practitioners, educators, students, and parents may consider promoting employability at HEIs by increasing collaboration among key stakeholders to create opportunities for students in building skills and competencies for job-readiness after graduation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147562999","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Employment and Employability at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): Perspectives of Undergraduate Students in Cambodia","authors":"Chealy Chet, Serey Sok, Chan Oeurn Chey, Leng Un, Veasna Sou, Chansopheak Keng, Chenda Our, Punleu Thou","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70115","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hequ.70115","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper has adopted an employability model introduced by the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) in 2004 to examine student employment at Cambodia's Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), focusing on the situation of employability during their studies and after graduation, as well as the antecedents of job capacity. The research is based on an online survey conducted among 482 students from 37 private and public universities across the nation. We also conducted key informant interviews, in-depth interviews, and a focus group discussion (FGD) for qualitative data. The research used Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) and the Chi-square test for quantitative analysis, and we also adopted qualitative interpretation to explain and clarify the survey findings. The research reveals that HEIs have promoted access to knowledge, skills, and competencies in response to the demands of the job market. The research finds that the monthly salaries obtained by students during their studies are inadequate to hire employees with high job capacity. There is a negative relationship between job capacity and expected salaries after graduation. Students with low job capacity tend to expect a high monthly salary upon graduation. Competencies are a mediating research variable to job capacity. The students have access to university knowledge and experience from the workplace. The paper uses SEM to contribute to the literature on employability from Cambodia's HEIs, focusing on knowledge, skills, competencies, career development, and job capacity. In the future, policymakers, planners, practitioners, educators, students, and parents may consider promoting employability at HEIs by increasing collaboration among key stakeholders to create opportunities for students in building skills and competencies for job-readiness after graduation.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147562773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Elke Stracke, Jen Webb, Allyson Holbrook, Rachel Burke, Vijay Kumar
{"title":"Learning From Failure for Doctoral Education","authors":"Elke Stracke, Jen Webb, Allyson Holbrook, Rachel Burke, Vijay Kumar","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70114","DOIUrl":"10.1111/hequ.70114","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Failure in doctoral education is a taboo topic for many supervisors and doctoral candidates. Failure in thesis doctoral examination is hard to admit to or explain and has not been deeply investigated. We aim to disrupt the silence around failure in the doctoral context and generate new discussions relevant to doctoral education. We conduct a theoretical integrative review (TIR), which allows for the inclusion of primary research studies, along with other documents (such as policy documents), in the international context. We seek to explore the learning potentials presented by a better understanding of failure to influence the broader debates about the future of the doctorate in times of uncertainty and crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"80 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70114","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147562602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}