Did Global Rankings and National Accreditation Drive Taiwanese Universities to Advance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?—Competitive Advantage, a Moral Symbol or Leading to a Paradigm Shift
Angela Yung Chi Hou, Ying Chen, Arianna Fang Yu Lin, Edward Hung Cheng Su, Kyle Zi-Wei Zhou, Christopher Hong-Yi Tao
{"title":"Did Global Rankings and National Accreditation Drive Taiwanese Universities to Advance Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)?—Competitive Advantage, a Moral Symbol or Leading to a Paradigm Shift","authors":"Angela Yung Chi Hou, Ying Chen, Arianna Fang Yu Lin, Edward Hung Cheng Su, Kyle Zi-Wei Zhou, Christopher Hong-Yi Tao","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Universities have recognised the pivotal role they play in advancing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to build a sustainable society. Two quality assessment instruments in higher education, <i>global rankings and quality assurance</i>, have developed a new set of metrics to measure university commitment to SDGs. This paper aims to analyse the SDGs advancement of Taiwan's 46 universities listed in THE Impact Ranking 2022 in response to the emerging sustainability metrics developed by global rankings and national accreditation, and to explore the purposes, institutional strategies and challenges they encountered. Major findings are as follows. Firstly, competitive advantage is the key reason driving universities for SDGs implementation. Secondly, the common strategy is to align university social responsibility project with general education curriculum. Thirdly, SDGs data reliability, internal quality assurance (IQA) mechanism establishment, intersectoral coordination and faculty and student engagement are the key challenges for SDGs implementation in Taiwan's universities.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Universities have recognised the pivotal role they play in advancing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to build a sustainable society. Two quality assessment instruments in higher education, global rankings and quality assurance, have developed a new set of metrics to measure university commitment to SDGs. This paper aims to analyse the SDGs advancement of Taiwan's 46 universities listed in THE Impact Ranking 2022 in response to the emerging sustainability metrics developed by global rankings and national accreditation, and to explore the purposes, institutional strategies and challenges they encountered. Major findings are as follows. Firstly, competitive advantage is the key reason driving universities for SDGs implementation. Secondly, the common strategy is to align university social responsibility project with general education curriculum. Thirdly, SDGs data reliability, internal quality assurance (IQA) mechanism establishment, intersectoral coordination and faculty and student engagement are the key challenges for SDGs implementation in Taiwan's universities.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.