{"title":"Leading for Research Excellence: Presidential Capabilities and Institutional Performance in Chinese Higher Education","authors":"Yueyan Dong, Jiazheng Wu, Nannan Yu","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70032","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Understanding how institutional leadership influences research productivity is crucial for advancing higher education policy and practice, yet empirical evidence remains limited in non-Western contexts. Drawing on upper echelons theory and a longitudinal dataset spanning 20 years (2000–2019) of 392 presidential appointments across Chinese universities, this study examines how presidential capabilities affect institutional research performance. Our findings demonstrate that presidential capabilities—measured through educational background, international experience, and academic achievements—significantly enhance research output, with effects varying across institutional contexts. The impact is most pronounced in second-tier research universities and shows stronger effects in economically developed regions and centrally administered institutions. These results contribute to understanding leadership effectiveness in higher education by highlighting how institutional contexts moderate presidential influence, offering valuable insights for leadership selection and development in higher education institutions.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144299705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Checklist for a Comprehensive Accreditation Model for Fully Electronic Higher Education Institutions: Synthesising Criteria and Expert Perspectives","authors":"Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani, Zainab Sadat Mostafavi, Hayden Godfrey","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70030","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research focuses on developing a comprehensive accreditation model for online, electronic, and distance education in higher education institutions (OEDE-HEIs). The surge in OEDE's global prevalence necessitates an evolved accreditation framework that addresses unique institutional needs. This study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining a deductive meta-synthesis of existing literature with an inductive, qualitative analysis of expert opinions. The objective was to integrate various accreditation criteria into a cohesive checklist tailored to OEDE-HEIs, ensuring robustness and relevance in the rapidly changing educational landscape. The research identified 5 principal themes and 45 subthemes, encompassing organisational structure, educational dimensions, research integration, support systems, and technological infrastructure. Key findings include the importance of organisational adaptability, emotional and administrative support, and the critical impact of technology on all facets of OEDE. This led to the creation of a novel, all-encompassing accreditation checklist, offering a holistic view of essential factors for high-quality, responsive online education. Additionally, the study highlights potential limitations, including regional biases from expert feedback and the dynamic nature of technological advancements. Recommendations for future research include broadening expert perspectives, regular updates to the accreditation criteria, and examining practical application challenges. This research contributes to the field by providing a detailed framework for accrediting OEDE-HEIs, fostering a more holistic, adaptable, and student-centric approach. Its implications extend to practitioners, policymakers, and educators, guiding operational strategies, policy formulation, and educational delivery enhancements in OEDE-HEIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70030","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144299706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Research Productivity and Africa's Productive Capacity: The Moderating Role of Government Education Expenditure","authors":"Ekene ThankGod Emeka, Simplice A. Asongu","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70039","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study provides empirical insights into the impact of research productivity on Africa's productive capacity, contingent upon government education expenditure. Using a panel of 52 African countries from 2010 to 2022, the dynamic system generalised method of moments (GMM) estimation technique was employed as a robust alternative to Pooled OLS. The analysis yielded several key findings. First, the system GMM results emphasise the importance of aligning research and development efforts with educational investments, as the effect of research productivity on productive capacity is influenced by government education expenditure. Second, governance quality, per capita income and industrial value-added emerged as key drivers of productive capacity, while natural resource endowment was found to be a limiting factor. Based on these findings, the study highlights the need for increased government education funding, collaborative research initiatives, professional development for educators, infrastructure investment, public-private partnerships, open data initiatives and technology integration to boost research productivity and enhance Africa's productive capacity. The study discusses how the research can be improved with other non-linear techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70039","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Student Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence Regulations: A Mixed-Methods Study of Higher Education in Singapore","authors":"Michelle Xin Yi Tan, Yao Qu, Jue Wang","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education has raised questions about student use, academic integrity, and institutional regulation. This study examines students' perceptions of and compliance with GenAI regulations in higher education, using a Singaporean university as a case study. Adopting a mixed-methods approach, the research combines thematic analysis of survey responses and quantitative modelling based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Qualitative results reveal that students value GenAI for its learning support, time efficiency, and advanced capabilities, yet emphasise the need for clearer guidelines and improved education on appropriate usage. Quantitative analysis highlights the positive influence of guideline understanding on compliance and declaration honesty but notes the negative impacts of perceived restrictiveness and increased GenAI experience. Faculty influence promotes compliance but minimally affects honesty, indicating the need for distinct strategies to address visible and ethical adherence. This research underscores the importance of balanced, flexible regulatory frameworks that integrate educational clarity and faculty engagement, advancing the discourse on GenAI governance in higher education.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Parenting in Academia: Unequal Pathways to Collaboration for Doctoral Students in South Korea","authors":"Hye Yeon Park, Heewon Moon","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70041","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study explores the challenges faced by parenting doctoral students, focusing on their research collaboration experiences, collaborative competency, and barriers to develop collaborative competency in comparison to their non-parenting counterparts. The research employs data collected through an online survey of doctoral students at a leading research university in South Korea in 2024. The results reveal that female parenting students report lower participation in international collaborations and face greater barriers in developing global competencies compared to male and non-parenting students. However, parenting students, particularly females, exhibit higher levels of self-perceived collaborative skills and attitudes. Notably, these differences are more pronounced in non-STEM fields, with no significant sex or parenting effects observed in STEM fields. The study highlights the need for higher education institutions to ensure that research collaboration opportunities are equally accessible to all students regardless of parenting status, sex, or discipline. The findings are timely given the global concern over declining fertility rates and their potential impact on the academia.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70041","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144299952","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reputation Management in a Chinese and UK University: What Do Universities' Self-Representations Through Social Media to Governments and International Students Say About Their Resource Dependence?","authors":"Zhuo Sun, Miguel Antonio Lim, Heather Cockayne","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70040","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study discusses the relationships between resource dependence, and reputation management (RM) through interviews with university managers regarding the use of social media by Chinese and UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This research enriches existing literature by providing a new and comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing university communication and reputational behaviour through the lens of Resource Dependence Theory (RDT) post COVID-19. The recruitment of international students in the chosen UK and Chinese HEIs is intricately tied to securing resources—but that these resources were valued differently at the case study HEIs. Nineteen interviews were conducted across the case universities and content analysis was employed to explore the perspectives of university managers. Our findings show that the admission of international students responded to the need to acquire legitimatory (in China) and financial resources (in the UK). These results signal an important difference in how international students, as resources, are perceived by these administrators. This insight explains why the UK and Chinese case universities' use of social media, especially after COVID-19, reflected their dependency on non-diversified (China case) and diversified resources (UK case). This insight is significant for policymakers and university staff who manage international student recruitment and also for the critical debate about students as ‘resources’.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70040","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144300193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Leading or Managing in the Middle: Exploring the Identities of Head of Departments in Higher Education Using Dynamic Systems Model","authors":"Norma Ghamrawi, Najah A. R. Ghamrawi, Tarek Shal","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70037","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drawing upon the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI), this study explored the construction of the role identity of department heads within higher education, with a specific emphasis on their perceptions of themselves as leaders and/or managers. Three section heads, each holding a doctoral degree in educational leadership from different Arab countries, were tracked throughout their inaugural year of appointment, examining the evolution of their role identities and the factors contributing to them. Data sources included reflective journals and two rounds of interviews per participant, with qualitative analysis employed to trace shifts and advancements in participants' ontological beliefs, objectives, self-perceptions and actionable potentials related to their roles. Findings unveiled notable transformations in all four dimensions of the DSMRI among the participants, with two individuals transitioning from predominantly leadership to managerial roles, whereas the third participant retained a reinforced identity as a leader. This evolution is discussed in relation to concepts of administrative burden, power and authority, emulation of senior leadership and reactivity versus proactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144244484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Time to (Re-)think-Feel ‘Quality’ in Higher Education Learning and Teaching","authors":"Josephine Gabi, Gladson Chikwa","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70036","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article proposes (re-)thinking-feeling the current Western-centric metrics-driven measurement of ‘quality’ in learning and teaching in higher education. We argue that ensuring ‘quality’ in learning and teaching is an undeniable imperative, as it not only cultivates possibilities for students to think critically and engage imaginatively in an ever-shifting global environment. The challenge is not only the <i>measurement</i> but the confusion between <i>what is measured</i> and <i>what is experienced</i> and the <i>neoliberal marketisation regime</i> of higher education (HE) that has transformed institutional priorities, connecting ‘quality’ and the performance metrics that underpin it. Conversations with five academics who participated in this study within the UK context, reveal a consensus that applying a standardised, ‘one-size-fits-all’ measurement of ‘quality’ in learning and teaching in higher education is fraught with difficulties. Each discipline must embrace tailored, contextually appropriate, and discipline-specific approaches to conceptualising and evaluating ‘quality’. We argue that Ubuntu ethico-onto-epistemological philosophy and praxis, decoloniality and posthumanism can help us think about ‘quality’ differently, enabling ways to resist colonial paradigms and neoliberal logic and their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70036","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220038","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Correction to ‘Higher Education and Disability: A Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Research’","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70033","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Maurya, J., N. Swaroop, P. Sadar, and D. Misra. 2025. “Higher Education and Disability: A Systematic Literature Review and Agenda for Research.” <i>Higher Education Quarterly</i> 79, no. 1: e70001.</p><p>The number of articles mentioned in the abstract is incorrect. It was published as:</p><p>Based on multistep methodology that included preliminary search, database selection and keyword-based article retrieval, we conducted a descriptive thematic analysis of <b>204</b> research articles on disability in higher education.</p><p>This should have been:</p><p>Based on multistep methodology that included preliminary search, database selection and keyword-based article retrieval, we conducted a descriptive thematic analysis of <b>227</b> research articles on disability in higher education.</p><p>We apologise for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70033","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144190867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"University Social Responsibility: Unravelling the Perceptions of External Stakeholders","authors":"Rosa M. Rodríguez-Izquierdo","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70035","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper examines how external stakeholders conceptualise university social responsibility (USR) and their perceptions about how universities implement USR in practice. A total of 18 external stakeholders from eight universities were interviewed. The results indicated that there was no shared and common conceptualization of USR and that USR was recurrently related to the areas of teaching, research, or community engagement, revealing an omission of management, governance, and campus life. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on USR by shedding light on the perspective of actors that are not sufficiently addressed in the literature, that is, those of external stakeholders. We argue for a revisited USR based on a reflective debate on the potential role of external stakeholders in helping higher education institutions address societal needs. The study informs practical applications that policymakers can use to advance their social impact and reduce the gap between USR policy and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70035","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144171520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}