Bridging Higher Education Research and Policy: The Role of Institutional Knowledge Brokers

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yishai Fraenkel, Annette Bamberger
{"title":"Bridging Higher Education Research and Policy: The Role of Institutional Knowledge Brokers","authors":"Yishai Fraenkel,&nbsp;Annette Bamberger","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We examine the role of institutional knowledge brokers in bridging higher education research (HER) and higher education policy, focusing on a parliamentary advisory body in Israel. Using citation and topic analysis, supplemented by stakeholder interviews, we investigate the topics addressed, sources of evidence utilised and perceptions of different forms of evidence. Findings reveal the limited influence of HER on advisory outputs, with governmental sources dominating the evidence base. The marginal role of HER is linked to perceptions of its limited timeliness, theoretical focus and perceived ideological biases. We highlight the inherent tensions faced by institutional knowledge brokers operating in political contexts, where navigating the demands for neutrality and relevance often limits their ability to engage with contentious or systemic issues. This challenge is particularly acute in the contemporary context, where academic knowledge production itself has become increasingly contested and a focal point of public and political polarisation. This study underscores the persistent challenge of integrating HER into policy and emphasises the need for more effective strategies to enhance the impact of scholarly research on policymaking. While grounded in the situated context of Israel's parliamentary advisory system, our findings illuminate tensions in the research–policy interface that may resonate beyond this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the role of institutional knowledge brokers in bridging higher education research (HER) and higher education policy, focusing on a parliamentary advisory body in Israel. Using citation and topic analysis, supplemented by stakeholder interviews, we investigate the topics addressed, sources of evidence utilised and perceptions of different forms of evidence. Findings reveal the limited influence of HER on advisory outputs, with governmental sources dominating the evidence base. The marginal role of HER is linked to perceptions of its limited timeliness, theoretical focus and perceived ideological biases. We highlight the inherent tensions faced by institutional knowledge brokers operating in political contexts, where navigating the demands for neutrality and relevance often limits their ability to engage with contentious or systemic issues. This challenge is particularly acute in the contemporary context, where academic knowledge production itself has become increasingly contested and a focal point of public and political polarisation. This study underscores the persistent challenge of integrating HER into policy and emphasises the need for more effective strategies to enhance the impact of scholarly research on policymaking. While grounded in the situated context of Israel's parliamentary advisory system, our findings illuminate tensions in the research–policy interface that may resonate beyond this setting.

Abstract Image

衔接高等教育研究与政策:机构知识经纪人的角色
我们研究了机构知识经纪人在弥合高等教育研究(HER)和高等教育政策方面的作用,重点关注以色列的议会咨询机构。通过引用和主题分析,辅以利益相关者访谈,我们调查了所讨论的主题,所使用的证据来源以及对不同形式证据的看法。调查结果显示,人力资源管理对咨询产出的影响有限,证据基础主要由政府来源提供。妇女健康教育的边缘作用与人们认为其时效性有限、理论重点和意识形态偏见有关。我们强调了在政治背景下运作的机构知识经纪人所面临的内在紧张局势,在这种情况下,对中立性和相关性的要求往往限制了他们参与有争议或系统性问题的能力。在当代背景下,这一挑战尤其尖锐,因为学术知识生产本身已变得越来越有争议,并成为公共和政治两极分化的焦点。这项研究强调了将环境科学纳入政策的持续挑战,并强调需要更有效的战略来增强学术研究对政策制定的影响。虽然基于以色列议会咨询系统的情境背景,我们的研究结果阐明了研究-政策界面中的紧张关系,这种紧张关系可能会在这种环境之外产生共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信