法规、技术政策与中国大学对人工智能的态度

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Xu Liu, Yuning Fang, Xiang Lan
{"title":"法规、技术政策与中国大学对人工智能的态度","authors":"Xu Liu,&nbsp;Yuning Fang,&nbsp;Xiang Lan","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>As artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative models, becomes increasingly integrated into global education systems, China's higher education sector is undergoing profound transformation. This article examines how AI is being regulated, institutionalised and contested within Chinese universities. Drawing on policy document analysis and 33 interviews with faculty members at research universities, the study explores how China's state-led governance model is interpreted and enacted on university campuses. The analysis focuses on three levels of engagement: national policy direction, institutional responses such as AI-powered teaching platforms, general and specialised AI education, and the establishment of AI's pedagogical, ethical and managerial implications. While faculty generally view AI as enhancing personalisation, research productivity and administrative efficiency, they also raise concerns about academic integrity, bias and overreliance on technology. The article argues that fostering a well-regulated, adaptable AI framework will be critical for sustainable progress, and that ongoing collaboration between policymakers, educators and technologists is essential to realise AI's full potential while safeguarding the academic values and quality that underpin higher education.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulations, Technology Policies and Universities' Attitudes to Artificial Intelligence in China\",\"authors\":\"Xu Liu,&nbsp;Yuning Fang,&nbsp;Xiang Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hequ.70055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>As artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative models, becomes increasingly integrated into global education systems, China's higher education sector is undergoing profound transformation. This article examines how AI is being regulated, institutionalised and contested within Chinese universities. Drawing on policy document analysis and 33 interviews with faculty members at research universities, the study explores how China's state-led governance model is interpreted and enacted on university campuses. The analysis focuses on three levels of engagement: national policy direction, institutional responses such as AI-powered teaching platforms, general and specialised AI education, and the establishment of AI's pedagogical, ethical and managerial implications. While faculty generally view AI as enhancing personalisation, research productivity and administrative efficiency, they also raise concerns about academic integrity, bias and overreliance on technology. The article argues that fostering a well-regulated, adaptable AI framework will be critical for sustainable progress, and that ongoing collaboration between policymakers, educators and technologists is essential to realise AI's full potential while safeguarding the academic values and quality that underpin higher education.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"79 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能(AI),特别是生成模型日益融入全球教育体系,中国高等教育部门正在经历深刻变革。本文探讨了人工智能在中国大学中是如何被监管、制度化和竞争的。通过对政策文件的分析和对33名研究型大学教师的采访,该研究探讨了中国国家主导的治理模式是如何在大学校园中被解释和实施的。该分析侧重于三个层面的参与:国家政策方向、机构反应(如人工智能教学平台)、一般和专业人工智能教育,以及人工智能在教学、伦理和管理方面的影响。尽管教师们普遍认为人工智能可以提高个性化、研究生产力和行政效率,但他们也提出了对学术诚信、偏见和过度依赖技术的担忧。文章认为,培育一个监管良好、适应性强的人工智能框架对于可持续发展至关重要,政策制定者、教育工作者和技术专家之间的持续合作对于实现人工智能的全部潜力,同时维护支撑高等教育的学术价值和质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regulations, Technology Policies and Universities' Attitudes to Artificial Intelligence in China

As artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative models, becomes increasingly integrated into global education systems, China's higher education sector is undergoing profound transformation. This article examines how AI is being regulated, institutionalised and contested within Chinese universities. Drawing on policy document analysis and 33 interviews with faculty members at research universities, the study explores how China's state-led governance model is interpreted and enacted on university campuses. The analysis focuses on three levels of engagement: national policy direction, institutional responses such as AI-powered teaching platforms, general and specialised AI education, and the establishment of AI's pedagogical, ethical and managerial implications. While faculty generally view AI as enhancing personalisation, research productivity and administrative efficiency, they also raise concerns about academic integrity, bias and overreliance on technology. The article argues that fostering a well-regulated, adaptable AI framework will be critical for sustainable progress, and that ongoing collaboration between policymakers, educators and technologists is essential to realise AI's full potential while safeguarding the academic values and quality that underpin higher education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信