Breaking Glass Dam: Women's Journey to Faculty Membership

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Afsaneh Dehghanpour-Farashah, Alireza Dehghanpour-Farashah, Mojgan Adnanrad
{"title":"Breaking Glass Dam: Women's Journey to Faculty Membership","authors":"Afsaneh Dehghanpour-Farashah,&nbsp;Alireza Dehghanpour-Farashah,&nbsp;Mojgan Adnanrad","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Considering the significantly lower percentage of Female Faculty Members (FFMs) compared to Male Faculty Members (MFMs) in Iranian universities, this cross-sectional mixed-methods study aims to identify and prioritise the barriers preventing women's entry into academic positions. Specifically, it explores the challenges faced by female PhD holders in securing such roles. The qualitative phase of this research involved in-depth interviews with 32 faculty members from public universities. These interviews led to the identification of four main categories and 20 initial sub-barriers. In the quantitative phase, a survey was administered to 358 faculty members from public universities in Tehran, and the collected data were analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), resulting in the refinement and validation of four main barriers and 18 sub-barriers. To assess gender-based differences in the perceived importance of these barriers, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney <i>U</i> test was employed due to the non-normal distribution of the data. In the final step, the identified barriers were prioritised using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), conducted separately for FFMs and MFMs. This study deepens our understanding of the structural and perceptual barriers that women face in accessing academic positions and provides evidence-based strategies to address these challenges and promote gender equity. As a key theoretical contribution, this research introduces the concept of the ‘Glass Dam’ to describe the subtle and invisible barriers that impede women's entry into professions such as academic roles.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the significantly lower percentage of Female Faculty Members (FFMs) compared to Male Faculty Members (MFMs) in Iranian universities, this cross-sectional mixed-methods study aims to identify and prioritise the barriers preventing women's entry into academic positions. Specifically, it explores the challenges faced by female PhD holders in securing such roles. The qualitative phase of this research involved in-depth interviews with 32 faculty members from public universities. These interviews led to the identification of four main categories and 20 initial sub-barriers. In the quantitative phase, a survey was administered to 358 faculty members from public universities in Tehran, and the collected data were analysed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), resulting in the refinement and validation of four main barriers and 18 sub-barriers. To assess gender-based differences in the perceived importance of these barriers, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test was employed due to the non-normal distribution of the data. In the final step, the identified barriers were prioritised using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), conducted separately for FFMs and MFMs. This study deepens our understanding of the structural and perceptual barriers that women face in accessing academic positions and provides evidence-based strategies to address these challenges and promote gender equity. As a key theoretical contribution, this research introduces the concept of the ‘Glass Dam’ to describe the subtle and invisible barriers that impede women's entry into professions such as academic roles.

Abstract Image

打破玻璃大坝:女性成为教员的旅程
考虑到伊朗大学中女性教员(ffm)的比例明显低于男性教员(MFMs),这项横断面混合方法研究旨在确定并优先考虑阻碍女性进入学术职位的障碍。具体来说,它探讨了女性博士在获得这些职位时面临的挑战。本研究的定性阶段包括对来自公立大学的32名教师进行深入访谈。这些访谈确定了四个主要类别和20个最初的子障碍。在定量阶段,对来自德黑兰公立大学的358名教师进行了调查,并使用验证性因子分析(CFA)对收集的数据进行了分析,从而改进和验证了四个主要障碍和18个子障碍。为了评估这些障碍的感知重要性的性别差异,由于数据的非正态分布,采用了非参数Mann-Whitney U检验。在最后一步,使用层次分析法(AHP)对确定的障碍进行优先排序,分别对ffm和mfm进行。这项研究加深了我们对女性在获得学术职位时面临的结构性和感性障碍的理解,并提供了基于证据的策略来应对这些挑战并促进性别平等。作为一项重要的理论贡献,本研究引入了“玻璃坝”的概念,以描述阻碍女性进入专业领域(如学术角色)的微妙和无形障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信