{"title":"领导还是中间管理:用动态系统模型探讨高等教育部门领导的身份","authors":"Norma Ghamrawi, Najah A. R. Ghamrawi, Tarek Shal","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Drawing upon the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI), this study explored the construction of the role identity of department heads within higher education, with a specific emphasis on their perceptions of themselves as leaders and/or managers. Three section heads, each holding a doctoral degree in educational leadership from different Arab countries, were tracked throughout their inaugural year of appointment, examining the evolution of their role identities and the factors contributing to them. Data sources included reflective journals and two rounds of interviews per participant, with qualitative analysis employed to trace shifts and advancements in participants' ontological beliefs, objectives, self-perceptions and actionable potentials related to their roles. Findings unveiled notable transformations in all four dimensions of the DSMRI among the participants, with two individuals transitioning from predominantly leadership to managerial roles, whereas the third participant retained a reinforced identity as a leader. This evolution is discussed in relation to concepts of administrative burden, power and authority, emulation of senior leadership and reactivity versus proactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leading or Managing in the Middle: Exploring the Identities of Head of Departments in Higher Education Using Dynamic Systems Model\",\"authors\":\"Norma Ghamrawi, Najah A. R. Ghamrawi, Tarek Shal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hequ.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Drawing upon the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI), this study explored the construction of the role identity of department heads within higher education, with a specific emphasis on their perceptions of themselves as leaders and/or managers. Three section heads, each holding a doctoral degree in educational leadership from different Arab countries, were tracked throughout their inaugural year of appointment, examining the evolution of their role identities and the factors contributing to them. Data sources included reflective journals and two rounds of interviews per participant, with qualitative analysis employed to trace shifts and advancements in participants' ontological beliefs, objectives, self-perceptions and actionable potentials related to their roles. Findings unveiled notable transformations in all four dimensions of the DSMRI among the participants, with two individuals transitioning from predominantly leadership to managerial roles, whereas the third participant retained a reinforced identity as a leader. This evolution is discussed in relation to concepts of administrative burden, power and authority, emulation of senior leadership and reactivity versus proactivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70037\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Leading or Managing in the Middle: Exploring the Identities of Head of Departments in Higher Education Using Dynamic Systems Model
Drawing upon the Dynamic Systems Model of Role Identity (DSMRI), this study explored the construction of the role identity of department heads within higher education, with a specific emphasis on their perceptions of themselves as leaders and/or managers. Three section heads, each holding a doctoral degree in educational leadership from different Arab countries, were tracked throughout their inaugural year of appointment, examining the evolution of their role identities and the factors contributing to them. Data sources included reflective journals and two rounds of interviews per participant, with qualitative analysis employed to trace shifts and advancements in participants' ontological beliefs, objectives, self-perceptions and actionable potentials related to their roles. Findings unveiled notable transformations in all four dimensions of the DSMRI among the participants, with two individuals transitioning from predominantly leadership to managerial roles, whereas the third participant retained a reinforced identity as a leader. This evolution is discussed in relation to concepts of administrative burden, power and authority, emulation of senior leadership and reactivity versus proactivity.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.