Evaluating Contextual Offer Making at Durham University

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Vikki Boliver, Karen Jones
{"title":"Evaluating Contextual Offer Making at Durham University","authors":"Vikki Boliver,&nbsp;Karen Jones","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In common with many other higher tariff universities in the United Kingdom, Durham University uses contextual data about the socio-economic circumstances of applicants to inform decisions about whom to admit to its undergraduate degree programmes. This paper draws on data for undergraduates who entered Durham University in the period 2018–2020 (<i>N</i> = 11,392) to assess the extent to which contextual offer making has been successful in widening participation and to examine how contextually admitted students (around a fifth of all entrants) have fared academically at the university in both relative and absolute terms. Analysis of this data shows that contextual offers have helped to increase the socio-economic diversity of the undergraduate population at the university with respect to POLAR quintile and other postcode-based measures of disadvantage, but not with respect to school type. Importantly, without the availability of contextual offers, a significant minority of contextually admitted students may not have received an initial offer of a place, and around half may not have had their offer confirmed after key stage 5 examination results were announced. Relative to standard offer entrants, contextually admitted students had slightly lower pass rates and slightly lower average marks in years 1, 2 and 3 of their degree programmes, and were substantially less likely to graduate with a first and slightly less likely to graduate with at least a 2:i. In absolute terms, however, contextually admitted students performed well at the university, with pass rates of 90% or more and average marks of 60 or higher across all 3 years of study, and rates of leaving with at least an upper second-class degree of more than 80%. Overall, contextual offer making at Durham University has been a success, helping to widen participation without compromising student success in absolute terms. Improvements to student support systems are needed, however, to help close the gap in relative rates of success at degree level.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In common with many other higher tariff universities in the United Kingdom, Durham University uses contextual data about the socio-economic circumstances of applicants to inform decisions about whom to admit to its undergraduate degree programmes. This paper draws on data for undergraduates who entered Durham University in the period 2018–2020 (N = 11,392) to assess the extent to which contextual offer making has been successful in widening participation and to examine how contextually admitted students (around a fifth of all entrants) have fared academically at the university in both relative and absolute terms. Analysis of this data shows that contextual offers have helped to increase the socio-economic diversity of the undergraduate population at the university with respect to POLAR quintile and other postcode-based measures of disadvantage, but not with respect to school type. Importantly, without the availability of contextual offers, a significant minority of contextually admitted students may not have received an initial offer of a place, and around half may not have had their offer confirmed after key stage 5 examination results were announced. Relative to standard offer entrants, contextually admitted students had slightly lower pass rates and slightly lower average marks in years 1, 2 and 3 of their degree programmes, and were substantially less likely to graduate with a first and slightly less likely to graduate with at least a 2:i. In absolute terms, however, contextually admitted students performed well at the university, with pass rates of 90% or more and average marks of 60 or higher across all 3 years of study, and rates of leaving with at least an upper second-class degree of more than 80%. Overall, contextual offer making at Durham University has been a success, helping to widen participation without compromising student success in absolute terms. Improvements to student support systems are needed, however, to help close the gap in relative rates of success at degree level.

Abstract Image

评估杜伦大学的背景录取
与英国许多其他收费较高的大学一样,杜伦大学使用有关申请人社会经济情况的背景数据来决定录取谁进入其本科学位课程。本文利用2018-2020年期间进入杜伦大学的本科生的数据(N = 11,392)来评估背景录取在扩大参与方面的成功程度,并研究背景录取的学生(约占所有入学学生的五分之一)在相对和绝对方面在大学的学术表现。对这些数据的分析表明,在POLAR五分位数和其他基于邮政编码的劣势衡量方面,背景录取有助于增加大学本科生人口的社会经济多样性,但在学校类型方面则没有。重要的是,如果没有上下文录取,相当一部分上下文录取的学生可能没有收到最初的录取通知,大约一半的学生可能在关键的第五阶段考试结果公布后没有得到录取确认。与标准录取学生相比,背景录取学生的通过率略低,学位课程第一、二、三年的平均成绩略低,获得一等学位的可能性大大降低,获得至少二等学位的可能性也略低。然而,从绝对意义上讲,被录取的学生在大学表现良好,在所有三年的学习中,通过率达到90%以上,平均分数达到60分或更高,毕业时至少获得二等以上学位的比例超过80%。总体而言,杜伦大学的背景录取是成功的,在不影响学生绝对成功的情况下,帮助扩大了学生的参与度。然而,需要改进学生支持系统,以帮助缩小学位水平上相对成功率的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY
HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信