{"title":"质量是幻觉?以“规范游戏”为概念的本科教育中的隐性权衡与风险思考","authors":"Deanna Meth","doi":"10.1111/hequ.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In-depth interviews exploring academics' teaching practices and views on undergraduate education at one English university reveal concerning examples of educational trade-offs in delivering on national and institutional quality expectations. Evidence reveals the negative impacts on teaching and students' learning and achievements. Quality instruments reflect their neoliberal managerialist environment, its internal structures of power, organisation and monitoring and are viewed through Foucault's concept of governmentality. Academics' responses align with a post-Foucauldian construct reflecting their negotiating behaviours in this space. A new conceptual model extends on Docherty's construct of ‘contained’ play to capture ways in which institutional quality systems and structures might restrict learning. The questions, ‘what lies hidden from the gaze of traditional quality measures?’ and ‘where does the real risk to quality lie?’ are asked, revealing quality to be illusory in some instances. Findings reinforce the critical need to better understand teaching academics' experiences as key mediators in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":51607,"journal":{"name":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","volume":"79 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality as Illusion? Considering Hidden Trade-Offs and Risks in Undergraduate Education Conceptualised as ‘Regulated Play’\",\"authors\":\"Deanna Meth\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hequ.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In-depth interviews exploring academics' teaching practices and views on undergraduate education at one English university reveal concerning examples of educational trade-offs in delivering on national and institutional quality expectations. Evidence reveals the negative impacts on teaching and students' learning and achievements. Quality instruments reflect their neoliberal managerialist environment, its internal structures of power, organisation and monitoring and are viewed through Foucault's concept of governmentality. Academics' responses align with a post-Foucauldian construct reflecting their negotiating behaviours in this space. A new conceptual model extends on Docherty's construct of ‘contained’ play to capture ways in which institutional quality systems and structures might restrict learning. The questions, ‘what lies hidden from the gaze of traditional quality measures?’ and ‘where does the real risk to quality lie?’ are asked, revealing quality to be illusory in some instances. Findings reinforce the critical need to better understand teaching academics' experiences as key mediators in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"79 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hequ.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hequ.70028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality as Illusion? Considering Hidden Trade-Offs and Risks in Undergraduate Education Conceptualised as ‘Regulated Play’
In-depth interviews exploring academics' teaching practices and views on undergraduate education at one English university reveal concerning examples of educational trade-offs in delivering on national and institutional quality expectations. Evidence reveals the negative impacts on teaching and students' learning and achievements. Quality instruments reflect their neoliberal managerialist environment, its internal structures of power, organisation and monitoring and are viewed through Foucault's concept of governmentality. Academics' responses align with a post-Foucauldian construct reflecting their negotiating behaviours in this space. A new conceptual model extends on Docherty's construct of ‘contained’ play to capture ways in which institutional quality systems and structures might restrict learning. The questions, ‘what lies hidden from the gaze of traditional quality measures?’ and ‘where does the real risk to quality lie?’ are asked, revealing quality to be illusory in some instances. Findings reinforce the critical need to better understand teaching academics' experiences as key mediators in this area.
期刊介绍:
Higher Education Quarterly publishes articles concerned with policy, strategic management and ideas in higher education. A substantial part of its contents is concerned with reporting research findings in ways that bring out their relevance to senior managers and policy makers at institutional and national levels, and to academics who are not necessarily specialists in the academic study of higher education. Higher Education Quarterly also publishes papers that are not based on empirical research but give thoughtful academic analyses of significant policy, management or academic issues.