Population Space and Place最新文献

{"title":"The Negotiation of Socio-Spatial Background Among Elite Chinese University Graduates","authors":"Benjamin Mulvey,&nbsp;Boya Li","doi":"10.1002/psp.70055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70055","url":null,"abstract":"<p>An increasingly rich body of literature focuses on the relationship between socio-spatial background, emotional attachment to place, and aspirations surrounding higher education. In this paper, we foreground the connections between attachment to place, mobility, education and aspirations—links that are often implicit and seldom highlighted in the Chinese context. To do so, we develop a theoretical framework that integrates Bourdieu's <i>theory of practice</i>, alongside the concepts of <i>suspension, neo-familism</i> and <i>individualisation</i>. Drawing on interviews with 40 final-year master's degree students at an elite Chinese university, from three social class factions, we explore how socio-spatial inequality is embodied and reflected in the future aspirations of students, particularly in the form of attachments to (or lack thereof) particular places, and the internalisation of cultural logics that stigmatise rurality and associate it with ‘low quality’. These processes represent under-recognised means through which social stratification is embodied and reproduced in the Chinese context, creating additional barriers for non-affluent students from rural backgrounds in ‘keeping up’ with urban peers after graduation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70055","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Classical Gentrification in a Formerly Working-Class Neighbourhood: Karlín as a Forerunner of Inner-City Migration Trends in Prague","authors":"Adela Petrović,&nbsp;Martin Ouředníček","doi":"10.1002/psp.70056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the transformation period, working-class neighbourhoods in the inner city of Prague have demonstrated a growing dynamism and attractiveness, as reflected in the recurrent changes in the socio-demographic composition of these neighbourhoods. This study investigates the changes in socio-demographic characteristics of people moving in and out of one of the most dynamic inner-city neighbourhoods in Prague – Karlín. The main objective of the paper is to understand and explain the impact of migration and quantify the characteristics of gentrification migration streams in this neighbourhood within the period 2010–2020. The migration data contains information regarding gender, age, marital status, state citizenship, and place of in- and out-migration. We demonstrate migration behaviour within the transforming housing estate from the 1960s, the new-built gentrification in New Karlín, and the classical gentrification in Old Karlín. The main outcomes of the analyses confirm that Karlín is going through an intense wave of classical gentrification, which is primarily driven by the influx of foreign migration and the displacement of the domestic population to other parts of the city. We argue that Karlín is a precursor of inner-city development in Prague and other Central and Eastern European cities, and gentrification has become the most important urban transformation process in contemporary Central and Eastern European cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144220365","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Corrections to “Determinants of Enforced Return: A Quantitative Analysis of the Spectrum of (In)voluntariness Among Rejected Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands”","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/psp.70051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70051","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Sinnige, M., Cleton, L., and Leerkes, A. 2025. “Determinants of Enforced Return: A Quantitative Analysis of the Spectrum of (In)voluntariness Among Rejected Asylum Seekers in the Netherlands.” <i>Population, Space and Place</i> 31, no. 2, e2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2886.</p><p>In the first sentence of the third paragraph of Section 2.2 “Policy Factors,” a reference to “many host states” is made, whereas this should have been “migrants' countries of citizenship.” The text should have read: “Since the early 2000s, the EU has also concluded several readmission agreements and various other, nonbinding, return deals with migrants' countries of citizenship (Niemann &amp; Zaun, 2023).”</p><p>Table 1 in Section 3 “Methodology” includes incorrect naming of our dependent variables. “Soft deportation” should be replaced by “Assisted Voluntary Return” and “Deportation” should be replaced by “Forced removal.”</p><p>In the final sentence of the third paragraph of Section 4 “Results,” “source country corruption” should have read “corruption in migrants' countries of citizenship.” The sentence should have read: “Interestingly, corruption in migrants' countries of citizenship has a significant <i>positive</i> effect on FR, which is in the opposite direction to what we expected.”</p><p>Table 2 in Section 4 “Results” includes incorrect column titles. “Soft deportation” should be replaced by “Assisted Voluntary Return” and “Deportation” should be replaced by “Forced removal.”</p><p>Table 2 in Section 4 “Results” includes an incorrect categorizing of our variables. “Intergovernmental policies” should be replaced by “Macro level.”</p><p>In footnotes 5 and 13, the term “deportation” appears. This should have read “forced removal.”</p><p>Additionally, a few changes were made to the published version of the article. They are as follows:</p><p>The third author's surname in reference Leerkes, Maliepaard, and van der Meer 2022 was corrected from “Meer” to “van der Meer.”</p><p>In the first sentence of Section 3 “Methodology,” identifiable information was not included post-peer review. The text has been updated to read: “The data set, previously used in a study on Assisted Voluntary Return (Leerkes et al., 2017), comprises 15,680 rejected asylum claims.”</p><p>In the third sentence of Section 3.4 “Ethics,” the university name and ethics approval number was not included post-peer review. The text has been updated to read: “The present analysis was carried out as part of an ongoing Horizon Europe research project, which received ethics approval from the Ethics Review Board of Erasmus University Rotterdam (decision number ETH2324-0063).”</p><p>In the fourth sentence of paragraph 2, Section 5 “Discussion and Conclusion,” the word “extend” was corrected to “extent.”</p><p>We apologize for these errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144214058","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"An Extension of Migration Effectiveness Indices: Accounting for the Impact of Migration on Population Structure","authors":"Sechang Kim,&nbsp;Sang-Il Lee","doi":"10.1002/psp.70049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70049","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study introduces the age-weighted migration effectiveness index (AWMEI), a new metric that integrates age-specific variation into a single measure of migration effectiveness. Traditional indices, such as the migration effectiveness index (MEI) and age-specific MEI (ASMEI), effectively address the first aspect of migration effectiveness—population redistribution—but overlook the second aspect—transformation of the composition of regional populations. The AWMEI bridges this gap by weighting net migration flows according to their age structure, offering comprehensive insights into migration's dual impacts. Applied to South Korea's internal migration data (2001–2022), the AWMEI uncovers patterns previously obscured by conventional measures. Nationally, an increasing divergence between AWMEI and MEI reveals growing age disparities in migration patterns. At regional and local scales, the AWMEI highlights substantial age-specific population shifts even where traditional indices indicate minimal migration effectiveness. Amid broader spatial demographic transitions, the AWMEI provides a robust analytical framework for capturing migration's demographic implications. Its inherent adaptability further allows broad application across diverse dimensions of population composition and various research contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70049","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144171834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Moving Back and Forth: A Longitudinal Approach to Analyze Migration Trajectories","authors":"Hanzhi Hu","doi":"10.1002/psp.70047","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70047","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Migration and its implications are key research topics in population studies. Although scholars argue for a paradigm shift to examine migration from a life-course perspective, the central body of empirical studies treated migration as a one-off event. Joining the recent growing studies that focus on migration trajectories, this study proposes a new approach to identify distinct migration trajectories and examine their consequences by considering the directions and frequencies of migrations. This study uses prospective data from China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2010–2020 to demonstrate the method and integrates with the fixed-effect model to estimate the impacts of the migration trajectories of the internal rural–urban child migrants on their educational attainment. Four migration trajectories were identified during the 10 years of observations, including migrant stayers, return migrants and circular migrants of different directions. Results illustrate their heterogeneities and educational consequences. The impact of one's migration trajectory on education is determined by the direction (to rural or to urban) of the transition and the accumulated effects of every transition.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144171714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Do Diaspora Engagement Policies Promote Loyal Ethnic Lobbying? Empirical Analysis of Turkey's Policies and the Lobbying Capacity of its Diaspora in Germany","authors":"Alfonso Giordano,&nbsp;Laura Sparascio","doi":"10.1002/psp.70052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70052","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This paper examines how sending governments engage their diasporas for lobbying purposes and the potential outcomes of such efforts. Using Turkey's diaspora in Germany as a case study, we apply an integrated framework combining insights from the diaspora engagement policies and ethnic lobbying literatures to address the question: To what extent is a sending country capable of mobilising its diaspora to lobby for its interests in the host country? We show that governments' policies can strengthen the diaspora lobbying capacity by enhancing the internal factors of ethnic lobbying success, such as political activity, unity, and collective identity. However, these efforts may provoke backlash from the host country, limiting the diaspora's access to political power and chances of successful lobbying. Moreover, when the group's interests diverge from the homeland's objectives, the diaspora may prioritise its own concerns, complicating states' efforts of mobilising a consistently loyal group. This study contributes to our understanding of state-diaspora relations by highlighting how states attempt to promote diaspora's lobbying and the complexity of such actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144171296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"From Students to Movers: Linking Internal and International Migration Trajectories Among Spanish Bachelor's and Advanced Vocational Training Graduates","authors":"José David Lopez Blanco","doi":"10.1002/psp.70050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70050","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The relationship between internal and international migration has traditionally been overlooked in migration research. Seeking to bridge this divide, we examine the cumulative, socioeconomically selective and functionally differentiated nature of youth spatial mobility. Using harmonized microdata from two nationally representative surveys of bachelor's graduates and advanced vocational trainees from the 2013/2014 cohort, we examine the role of pre-graduation mobility, social origin and field of study in shaping postgraduation migration outcomes. Our findings show that any form of educational mobility is a strong predictor of subsequent migration. Migration trajectories are also stratified by parental education, with graduates from more privileged backgrounds more likely to engage in international or complex mobility paths. Additionally, migration motives and patterns vary by migration type and field of study, supporting a functional differentiation between internal and international mobility. These results highlight how different forms of mobility are embedded in cumulative life-course processes and socially structured opportunity regimes, underscoring the need for more integrated theoretical and policy approaches to youth migration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70050","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144140399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Which Types of Public Services Matter? The Impact of Access to Public Services on the Urban Settlement Intention of Migrants in China","authors":"Ziming Liu,&nbsp;Yuan Zheng,&nbsp;Bintong Yu,&nbsp;Zhigang Wang","doi":"10.1002/psp.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>This study examined which migrants accessed four types of urban public services including housing support, medical insurance, health records, and residence permits, and investigated the relative impacts of such accessibility of public services on the urban settlement intention of migrants. Using the China Migrants Dynamic Survey (CMDS) data in 2017, our results show that migrants have selective access to public services in urban China. That is, migrants with a higher socioeconomic status (in their prime working years, with higher household income and educational attainments) are more likely to access urban public services. Then we find that such multiple public services all have positive but different effects on migrants' settlement intention, after eliminating bias due to the selective accessibility of migrants by propensity score matching analysis. The magnitude of the estimated effects of housing support and medical insurance is considerably higher than residence permits and health records.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144085158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Refugee Integration Industry: Stakeholder Power, Market Logic, and the (De)Humanisation of Refugee Labour","authors":"Mustafa F. Özbilgin,&nbsp;Dimitria Groutsis,&nbsp;Joana Vassilopoulou,&nbsp;Cihat Erbil","doi":"10.1002/psp.70043","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70043","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper theorises the refugee integration industry by examining how institutional configurations and stakeholder arrangements shape labour market integration outcomes for refugees in Germany and Turkey. Drawing on Spender's theory of industrial recipes, we conceptualise the integration industry as a network of public, private and third-sector actors governed by competing logics of humanitarianism and market efficiency. Through a comparative case study approach based on more than 200 policy, institutional, and civil society sources, we demonstrate how power asymmetries and economic imperatives systematically marginalise refugees' human agency, producing both humanising and dehumanising effects. We introduce a fourfold typology of (de)humanitarianism, indifference, assimilation, integration and multiculturalism models that reveals how different national and organisational contexts mediate the moral, economic, and political tensions at the heart of refugee labour market integration. Despite stark contrasts in governance models and economic capacity, both countries institutionalise forms of exclusion that limit meaningful participation and recognition. Our analysis advances the theoretical understanding of the refugee integration industry as a contested and relational space where policy, discourse and institutional practice interact to shape refugee subjectivities and futures. In doing so, we call for more reflexive, inclusiv, and agency-centred approaches to integration that foreground social justice and co-determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70043","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143944415","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Non-Survival to Pension Age in Denmark and Sweden: A Sub-National Investigation","authors":"Ilya Kashnitsky","doi":"10.1002/psp.70046","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70046","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Mortality keeps improving even in the most developed countries. Deaths before senior age become more and more occasional and thus are increasingly considered unnecessary and perhaps even avoidable. Denmark belongs to the most developed countries of the world in terms of progress in lowering human mortality levels. Yet there is still much room for large improvements—compared to Sweden, the Danish population has almost the same survival profile up to age 50 but then there are striking differences in later ages. Between ages 50 and 65 about 10% of Danish males die while in Sweden this proportion is only about 7%. This paper explores the regularities of non-survival to pension age across Danish municipalities and compares them to ones in Sweden. The main focus of this exploration is identification of the spatial patterns based on the mortality characteristics of the population that are studied using the advanced spatial clustering algorithm. The methodological challenge resolved along the way is the construction of reliable life table estimates for the small municipal populations. The results suggest that the main reason for the observed gap between Danish and Swedish municipalities, especially for males, is the lagging behind development of the most deprived areas, which corresponds with the results on widening gaps along socioeconomic dimensions.</p>\u0000 </div>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143944414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}