{"title":"The Negotiation of Socio-Spatial Background Among Elite Chinese University Graduates","authors":"Benjamin Mulvey, Boya Li","doi":"10.1002/psp.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>An increasingly rich body of literature focuses on the relationship between socio-spatial background, emotional attachment to place, and aspirations surrounding higher education. In this paper, we foreground the connections between attachment to place, mobility, education and aspirations—links that are often implicit and seldom highlighted in the Chinese context. To do so, we develop a theoretical framework that integrates Bourdieu's <i>theory of practice</i>, alongside the concepts of <i>suspension, neo-familism</i> and <i>individualisation</i>. Drawing on interviews with 40 final-year master's degree students at an elite Chinese university, from three social class factions, we explore how socio-spatial inequality is embodied and reflected in the future aspirations of students, particularly in the form of attachments to (or lack thereof) particular places, and the internalisation of cultural logics that stigmatise rurality and associate it with ‘low quality’. These processes represent under-recognised means through which social stratification is embodied and reproduced in the Chinese context, creating additional barriers for non-affluent students from rural backgrounds in ‘keeping up’ with urban peers after graduation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
An increasingly rich body of literature focuses on the relationship between socio-spatial background, emotional attachment to place, and aspirations surrounding higher education. In this paper, we foreground the connections between attachment to place, mobility, education and aspirations—links that are often implicit and seldom highlighted in the Chinese context. To do so, we develop a theoretical framework that integrates Bourdieu's theory of practice, alongside the concepts of suspension, neo-familism and individualisation. Drawing on interviews with 40 final-year master's degree students at an elite Chinese university, from three social class factions, we explore how socio-spatial inequality is embodied and reflected in the future aspirations of students, particularly in the form of attachments to (or lack thereof) particular places, and the internalisation of cultural logics that stigmatise rurality and associate it with ‘low quality’. These processes represent under-recognised means through which social stratification is embodied and reproduced in the Chinese context, creating additional barriers for non-affluent students from rural backgrounds in ‘keeping up’ with urban peers after graduation.
期刊介绍:
Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research