Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment最新文献

{"title":"“COP of the Forest” highlights global conservation contradictions","authors":"Lucas Colares, Bruno Eleres Soares","doi":"10.1002/fee.2845","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2845","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The annual United Nations Climate Change Conference—COP, or the Conference of the Parties—is the main global forum to advance climate goals through international collaboration. Its most recent gatherings underscored the urgency of reducing carbon emissions, conserving forests and biodiversity, and creating better ways to sustainably manage water and produce food. However, the pathway to achieve such goals is often challenged by a global economy serving the high resource demands of wealthy countries and by socio-environmental conflicts in the Global South.</p><p>Critics often argue that COP benefits wealthy countries the most by setting a global stage for them to showcase their policies. Moreover, the inflow of resources into host cities is applied to event management and infrastructure, which poorly reflect long-term positive changes. Like many other international mega-events, COP might leave behind a legacy of degradation and disruption, for which the host city's most vulnerable residents will bear an outsized impact. And the next one—COP 30, November 10–21, 2025—will be held in the Amazon, with Belém, the capital of the Brazilian state of Pará, as its host city.</p><p>Central to global climate stability, the Amazon region is facing severe, unprecedented environmental crises, which highlight the contradictions of hosting such an event in this place. In 2024 alone, Pará recorded over 50,000 wildfires, almost half of all wildfires recorded in the Brazilian Amazon. That same year, on November 24, in Santarém, Pará's third largest city, air pollution spiked to levels more than 40 times those recommended by the World Health Organization, thereby prompting a climate emergency declaration. Six days later, on November 30, Belém citizens awoke under a blanket of smoke from fires on Mosqueiro Island, over 80 km away. Meanwhile, unlicensed infrastructure projects to meet COP 30 necessities, including a major highway expansion, threaten local biodiversity. Such projects betray the local governance priorities, placing international optics over meaningful action.</p><p>The juxtaposition of Pará's role as host of the “COP of the Forest” and its pressing environmental issues highlights the contradictions that COP faces. These challenges go beyond deforestation and pollution, exposing deep socio-environmental inequities. For instance, 80% of Belém's population lacks access to basic sanitation (<i>Res Soc Dev</i> 2020), underscoring the persistent gap between governance rhetoric and tangible action. Pará has been at the forefront of deforestation in the Amazon, leading the region in forest loss for about two decades. This ongoing deforestation threatens the state's rich biodiversity, including over 20,000 animal and plant species, while also impacting 134 traditional and Indigenous communities across over 25% of Pará's territory. These communities already face increasing pressures from illegal mining, highway and hydroelectric projects, and violent conflicts w","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2845","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Assessing Nature: perceptions, knowledge, and gaps","authors":"Gillian Bowser, Kofi Akamani, Meena M Balgopal, John D Coley, Elizabeth D Diaz-Clark, W Chris Funk, Brian Helmuth, Sérgio Henriques, Nikki Grant-Hoffman, Tashiana Osborne, Arathi Seshadri, Pamela H Templer, Mark C Urban, Kim Waddell","doi":"10.1002/fee.2846","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2846","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2022, the US Global Change Research Program initiated the first National Nature Assessment (NNA) via presidential Executive Order, addressing the need to “take stock of US lands, waters, wildlife and the benefits they provide to our economy, health, climate, environmental justice, and national security” (Global Change Research Act of 1990). This order was rescinded in January 2025, effectively cancelling the NNA before the final assessment was published. However, many of its authors deemed this multi-year endeavor important enough to keep alive because the NNA was needed to provide the American public with a “comprehensive understanding of nature, an assessment enriched by braiding together the stories, scientific findings, Indigenous knowledge, and lived experiences of people from across the US” (Tallis <i>et al</i>. <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Performing such an assessment requires moving beyond a mere snapshot of the status and trends of environmental features, ecosystems, and organisms, and weaving in diverse perspectives and knowledge systems representing the cultural complexity and heritage of American communities (Chan <i>et al</i>. <span>2016</span>). As experts convened by the NNA, we—the authors of this commentary—represent different scientific disciplines including ecology, genomics, entomology, science communication, psychology, natural resource management, Earth and environmental sciences, and human dimensions of natural resources. We explored the status, trends, and future projections of nature but recognized that our own perspectives and training represent only a slice of the many cultural perspectives and knowledge systems addressing the human–nature nexus. Regardless, we were tasked, as part of the NNA, with assessing the available scientific literature and associated knowledge sources (including information from museums, zoos, participatory databases, and government agencies). We were and are deeply committed to the view that humans are part of nature, and that human values and perceptions of nature shape what we measure, protect, manage, and love in the environments that surround and sustain us.</p><p>The original vision of the NNA is still critically important as it required us to interlink social perceptions with scientific information and knowledge gaps as ways to understand how the nature of today is uniquely shaped by American society, what the nature of the future will likely be, and how we can use that understanding to support nature that benefits all Americans. We argue that interlinkages among people's perceptions of nature and the data available to measure nature across different biological scales—including populations, communities, and ecosystems—shape a future nature in complex and potentially unpredictable ways.</p><p>Here, we share our approach of using constructive dialogues and storytelling as exemplified by the Talanoa Dialogues introduced by Fiji to the UNFCCC in 2017. We frame the status and trends of nat","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2846","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Thank you for choosing…","authors":"Scott L Collins","doi":"10.1002/fee.2838","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2838","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While I was enjoying a recent cross-country flight jammed between the fuselage and a generously proportioned passenger in the middle seat, the pilot came on the intercom and said, “we know you have a choice in airlines, thank you for choosing…”. I found that statement somewhat ironic because through deregulation and consolidation, we actually have fewer choices when we fly today than we did in the past. The same cannot be said for scientific publishing. In contrast to the number of carriers in the airline industry, the number of scientific journals in academic publishing continues to increase. Indeed, the <i>Nature</i> “family” of journals currently includes something like 55 publications, which seems more like a commune than a family to me. Nevertheless, this does mean that authors have more choices when deciding where to submit a manuscript. Of course, not all of those options are appropriate, or even desirable in the case of predatory publishers.</p><p>Although it is possible to categorize journals in multiple ways (impact factors, open access options, etc.), one clear dichotomy when considering where to submit a manuscript is the choice between a society-run journal versus a journal produced by a strictly for-profit publisher. Both the Ecological Society of America (ESA) and the British Ecological Society (BES), to name just two of many scientific societies, publish multiple journals through a commercial publisher, in this case John Wiley and Sons, or simply “Wiley”. Indeed, commercial publishers like Wiley currently dominate publishing in the ecological and broader natural sciences. To some degree, the relationship between scientific societies and commercial publishers is symbiotic in that both benefit from the interaction. Wiley makes a profit by marketing the journals and shares some of that revenue with the scientific society; at the same time, societies like ESA use those funds to advance their goals through a variety of activities as diverse as training workshops, awards and honors, or travel grants to attend the annual meeting. In contrast, with purely for-profit journals, like many published by Springer Nature, revenues go to shareholders. This does not mean that these publishers are necessarily bad choices, but in many such cases the motive is profit and the flow of revenue back to the scientific community is limited.</p><p>My interest in this topic was recently piqued by an article from a group of early career researchers (Ecol Lett 2024) who argued that the publish-or-perish ethic in research universities has created an unethical publishing system. They based this argument on the perception that academics need to publish in high-impact journals to get (and keep) a job, and many such journals originate from for-profit publishers. The authors likened this to David versus Goliath. However, their own data contradict this perception as they report that “roughly half of recent Assistant Professor hires at North American Doctoral Unive","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2838","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Conservation of the Atlantic Forest trees through Indigenous sustainability","authors":"Francys Alves Paulino, Orivaldo Nunes Júnior, João Carlos Ferreira de Melo Júnior","doi":"10.1002/fee.2839","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2839","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Atlantic Forest harbors one of the most diverse and threatened tropical forest biotas worldwide. Recognized as a global biodiversity hotspot, the biome extends along Brazil's Atlantic coast and into eastern Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, spanning a wide range of latitudinal, longitudinal, altitudinal, and climatic gradients. Its flora includes taxa from the Amazon Rainforest, Cerrado gallery forests, and the Andean region, encompassing approximately 25,000 species of vascular plants, 48% of which are endemic and 3400 of which are trees (Oliveira-Filho and Fontes <span>2000</span>).</p><p>The degradation of the Atlantic Forest reflects centuries of human expansion triggered by the arrival of European colonizers in the 16th century CE. Over time, economic cycles, such as those associated with brazilwood, sugarcane, gold, and coffee, as well as urbanization, ranching, and railway/road construction, have severely impacted the forest (Dean <span>2013</span>). Today, much of the Atlantic Forest consists of patches of secondary forests at varying stages of recovery, monoculture plantations of non-native trees, and small forest fragments surrounded by open areas dominated by anthropogenic landscapes (Tabarelli <i>et al</i>. <span>2010</span>). An estimated ~120 million people (70% of Brazil's population) live along Brazil's Atlantic coast, exacerbating pressure on the remaining forest, which currently covers only 12% of its original extent (SOS Mata Atlântica <span>2023</span>). In this context, urban expansion, industrialization, intensive agriculture, and mining not only accelerate deforestation and biodiversity loss but also erode the ancestral knowledge and cultures of Indigenous peoples who have inhabited these lands for millennia.</p><p>Currently, Brazil is home to 305 Indigenous peoples who speak 274 different languages. These groups inhabit territories composed of forests and other associated non-forest systems. The differences exhibited by these communities reflect their sociocultural variety, arising from distinct logics, conceptions, and practices specific to each people and shaped by various historical, social, and environmental contexts (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Among the Indigenous peoples coexisting within the Atlantic Forest are the Guarani (Guarani Mbya), Kaingang, Pataxó, Tupinambá, and Tupiniquim. For these groups, nature and biodiversity not only are deeply connected with beliefs, knowledge, history, and culture but also depend on management techniques to better ensure their persistence over time. Embedded within multiple dimensions—social, cultural, political, economic, environmental, philosophical, and spiritual—traditional Indigenous knowledge fosters a sustainable way of relating to nature, land, and biodiversity, contributing to landscape and biodiversity conservation (Cunha <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>).</p><p>Indigenous cultural practices are expressed through a diversity of songs, dances, c","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2839","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A field station's recipe for impactful science","authors":"Aaron S David, Sahas Barve, Elizabeth H Boughton, Joshua H Daskin, Hilary M Swain","doi":"10.1002/fee.2833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2833","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As society navigates unprecedented global change, we need science-backed solutions to confront compounding ecological crises. While we ecologists often intend to do impactful science that addresses these crises, too often we are guilty of “hoping”, rather than “planning”, for impact. Within ecologically minded institutions, having planned impacts increases the likelihood of success and starts with a well-defined <i>mission</i>, which states the organization's purpose and guides its activities. Mission-oriented science can influence agency policy, shape sustainable land-use planning, guide management best practices, train future scientists, and more. However, the challenge is to build from mission-oriented science to maximize impact. Here, we identify three key ingredients of a recipe for achieving impact: (1) <i>synergistic science</i>, (2) <i>knowledge of place</i>, and (3) <i>bridging to partners</i>. Although grounded in our experiences at Archbold Biological Station, a nonprofit field station in south-central Florida, and in our collective knowledge of similar stations, we believe these ingredients are broadly applicable across scientific institutions.</p><p><i>Synergistic science</i> refers to teams of researchers working together toward an institution's mission. Simply put, complex environmental challenges require diverse teams to address them holistically. For example, Archbold's fire management plan is based on decades of our own science across taxa, providing a comprehensive framework for balancing the fire needs of multiple organisms, and, to date, resulting in >350 prescribed burns of an endangered scrub ecosystem. Synergistic science may be interdisciplinary or emerge from participation in formal research networks (eg USDA's Long-Term Agroecosystem Research [LTAR] network). For instance, testing strategies for sustainable agroecosystems required synthesizing data collected by 18 researchers from 53 long-term co-located studies of biodiversity, water quality, soils, and greenhouse gases at Archbold’s Buck Island Ranch (Nat Commun 2023).</p><p><i>Knowledge of place</i> refers to a deep understanding of local or regional ecosystems, biota, and processes, and to being a trusted information source among key stakeholders in governmental, academic, nonprofit, and for-profit sectors (Univ. of Chicago Press 2010). Solutions to large-scale environmental challenges arise from local actions based on knowledge of place. Developing knowledge of place is often not straightforward and may require lengthy engagement to build relevant expertise, resources, datasets, and partnerships. Ultimately, knowledge of place allows organizations a seat at the table in decision making; in our case, such knowledge allows staff to engage closely with county planners on policies supporting prescribed fire, establishing conservation areas, and avoiding development sprawl.</p><p><i>Bridging to partners</i> refers to how the organization works with other, mission-","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2833","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143111292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Wolves and human-caused mortality—a reply to Cassidy et al.","authors":"Danny Caudill, Joshua H Schmidt, Graham G Frye, Elaine D Gallenberg, Gretchen Caudill, Jerrold L Belant","doi":"10.1002/fee.2830","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2830","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cassidy <i>et al</i>. (<span>2023</span>) evaluated the effect of mortality on aspects of gray wolf (<i>Canis lupus</i>) demography, concluding that “…human activities can have major negative effects on the biological processes…”. We agree that the effects of human-caused mortalities on wildlife are of broad interest (eg Caudill <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>; Frye <i>et al</i>. <span>2022</span>). However, we contend Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s study has shortcomings with regard to its data, design, biological inference, and statistical interpretation.</p><p>Although potentially resolvable, Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s data contain inconsistencies and are sparse across covariate values (as detailed in Data S1, available at https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/Reference/Profile/2302764), leading to uncertainty in the reliability and generalizability of their results. For example, missing covariate values resulted in the misapplication of model selection procedures and the exclusion of nearly all data from Voyageurs National Park from some models. Furthermore, the random effects were inappropriately structured and unstable, potentially because one site (Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve; YUCH) contained all observations of human-caused mortalities of >4 wolves and most observations of ≥2 leaders lost. Cassidy <i>et al</i>.'s results were also disproportionately influenced by YUCH (Data S1). Moreover, wolf harvest legally occurs within portions of Denali National Park and Preserve and YUCH, and about 62% of mortalities observed in YUCH were attributable to lethal control programs in the surrounding area (~25% of mortalities in the entire dataset were attributed to lethal control). Hence, inference on harvest and wolf control in general (eg transboundary management) is ambiguous. Instead, the results of Cassidy <i>et al</i>. may reflect the previously documented negative impact on wolf demography from a specific lethal management action conducted adjacent to YUCH (Schmidt <i>et al</i>. <span>2017</span>).</p><p>The most critical limitation within Cassidy <i>et al</i>. is the study design. To provide reliable inference, a design must adequately exclude alternate hypotheses (ie Platt <span>1964</span>). A design focused on any subset of mortality types in isolation could represent an a priori false null hypothesis because mortality in general could be negatively related to pack demography. The mixed logistic regression models in Cassidy <i>et al</i>. compared a group of packs in which human-caused mortality was observed (along with an unknown level of natural mortality) to a “contaminated” control group of packs in which human-caused mortality was not observed (but which also experienced unknown levels of natural mortality and human-caused mortality of non-collared pack members). This design cannot exclude the alternate hypothesis that any type of mortality (including natural mortality) could have caused the obser","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2830","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143117025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Habitat-mediated soundscape conservation in marine ecosystems","authors":"Kieran D Cox,&nbsp;Hailey L Davies,&nbsp;Audrey Looby,&nbsp;Kelsie A Murchy,&nbsp;Francis Juanes,&nbsp;Isabelle M Côté","doi":"10.1002/fee.2824","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2824","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The nexus between changing habitats, faunal communities, and anthropogenic stressors represents an enduring conservation challenge. We propose that habitat-mediated soundscape conservation—the ability of biogenic habitats to attenuate anthropogenic noise—plays an unrecognized role in mitigating underwater noise pollution, a pervasive disturbance that disrupts the ability of species to perceive acoustic cues and communicate. We hypothesize that noise attenuation depends on the composition and physical complexity of biogenic habitats, and severe habitat degradation can cause acoustic conditions to exceed ecological tipping points, resulting in the emergence of alternative acoustic states. We examine this concept in coral reefs and kelp forests, given that the global decline of both ecosystems provides the requisite conditions to investigate our hypothesis. We then explore why anthropogenic structures fail to provide acoustic refugia. Finally, we assess whether habitat restoration or acoustic enrichment can reestablish natural soundscapes. Our review underscores the importance of considering habitat degradation when evaluating the risk that pollutants pose to ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2824","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143530790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Invasion risk posed by the pet trade","authors":"Luke J Evans,&nbsp;J Alex Baecher,&nbsp;Brett R Scheffers","doi":"10.1002/fee.2825","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2825","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The legal trade in exotic pets is linked to the establishment of nonnative species and climate change compounds the risk of invasion, overwhelming management efforts. We characterized the world's largest market for exotic pets—the US—by providing a real-time snapshot of species with invasion potential, and assessed the current and future risk posed to native systems. We found a diverse marketplace of 1178 terrestrial vertebrates, predominantly tropical species. Using 2818 brick-and-mortar pet stores, we developed spatial models of propagule risk, from which it was determined that future climate change may increase climate suitability by 194%, which in turn equates to 83% of total land area in the contiguous US becoming suitable for invasion by 2080. Rapid growth in the exotic pet trade industry is expected to exacerbate current findings, especially at southernmost latitudes. The real-time nature of this study provides more actionable management information than outdated import data.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741287","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Can AI interpretation increase inclusivity?","authors":"Heather Fair,&nbsp;Osmary A Medina-Báez,&nbsp;Barbara J Spiecker,&nbsp;Qingyu Gan,&nbsp;Yan Yin “Jenny” Cheung,&nbsp;Elvira D'Bastiani,&nbsp;Gregory R Goldsmith","doi":"10.1002/fee.2821","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2821","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;This was expressed by a speaker at the 2024 Ecological Society of America's (ESA's) Annual Meeting, where we conducted an experimental special session (&lt;i&gt;SS 31 - Towards Equity in the Communication of Science: Harnessing the Power of AI for an Inclusive Tomorrow&lt;/i&gt;) to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI) interpretation of scientific talks by native speakers of Cantonese, Mandarin Chinese, Portuguese, and Spanish into real-time running English captions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One fundamental value of the ESA is to “[provide] the community of ecologists of diverse backgrounds, heritage, and career paths with a supportive home that advances their aspirations”. Currently, the lingua franca at international science meetings is English, which certainly discourages or prevents many talented scientists from sharing their science, networking with colleagues, and otherwise fully participating in international conferences. Indeed, many avoid attending annual conferences altogether due to language barriers. Emerging AI technologies may soon make it possible to attract a diversity of new voices into science. ESA members are from all over the world: representing 88 countries as of 2023. By giving individuals the option to deliver presentations in the language they are most comfortable with through real-time AI interpretation, we might honor our collective ancestral voices and diversify the messages of science.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To assess the quality of AI interpretation through real-time subtitles for spoken content, we used a common presentation software and a paid AI interpretation service, in which we paired an Asian language with a Latin language of similar interpretation difficulty. After the talks, we conducted a survey and held an audience discussion assessing our experiences with the AI interpretation. Attendees of the session spoke several languages, and most were early-career individuals, both of which may not be reflective of ESA membership as a whole.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There was much to be excited about. Of the attendees who completed the survey, 84% (27/32) indicated they were likely to attend future sessions with interpretation subtitles, 84% (27/32) rated the continued exploration of AI interpretation as important, and 97% (29/30) agreed that “AI interpretation technologies make scientific conferences more inclusive for non-native English speakers”. These results demonstrate support for AI interpretation as a means to enhance inclusion at scientific conferences, but there is more work to do to ensure that adequate consideration is given to how diverse individuals obtain and communicate information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From our collective experience and discussion, we learned that AI interpretation is advancing rapidly, but is still not ready for widespread implementation: (1) The audience experienced cognitive overload with the lines of scrolling subtitles, which moved too quickly even with rehearsed pauses by the speakers; (2) As AI switched the grammatical structure from Asian languages to ","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"22 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2821","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142762472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rethinking the undergraduate textbook as a tool to build a diverse community of ecologists","authors":"Jeannine H Richards,&nbsp;Katherine T Charton,&nbsp;Stephanie L McFarlane,&nbsp;Abigail F Widell,&nbsp;Nick M Haddad,&nbsp;Mary B Wyer,&nbsp;Ellen I Damschen","doi":"10.1002/fee.2819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2819","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recruitment and retention of a diverse scientific workforce depends on a more inclusive culture of science. Textbooks introduce prospective scientists to their chosen field and convey its cultural norms. We use ecology textbook data spanning two decades and document little change in representation of scientists during that time. Despite decades of multifaceted efforts to increase diversity in ecology, 91% of founders/innovators and 76% of working scientists introduced in textbooks were white men, poorly matching the demographics of scientists currently publishing in ecology. Textbook images depicted white men working as scientists, while women and people of color were frequently shown as nonscientists. Moreover, textbooks lack discussion of how science and society shape each other. Pathways to increase retention and sense of belonging for individuals from historically excluded groups include updating textbooks to accurately represent the scientists active in the field, contextualizing historical constraints on participation, and revealing how culture shapes scientific investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2819","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143741234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}