Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment最新文献

{"title":"Legacy effects of locally extinct flagship species on protected areas","authors":"Rachakonda Sreekar,&nbsp;James EM Watson,&nbsp;Jiajia Liu,&nbsp;Aakash Lamba,&nbsp;Hoong Chen Teo,&nbsp;Jun Ying Lim,&nbsp;Yiwen Zeng","doi":"10.1002/fee.70065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70065","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Protected areas (PAs) are often established to conserve flagship megafauna so as to mobilize political support and secure sustained conservation investment, with the expectation that flagship-centered governance will also protect habitat. Despite such efforts, flagship species can experience extirpation, raising a fundamental question: do conservation systems endure beyond the species that inspired protection? Using a causal-inference framework combining propensity-score matching and the synthetic-control method, we compared observed forest loss to counterfactual expectations before and after extirpation of the Javan rhinoceros (<i>Rhinoceros sondaicus</i>) from Vietnam's Cat Tien National Park and tiger (<i>Panthera tigris</i>) from Laos's Nam Et–Phou Louey National Park. Our results show that forest loss trajectories did not change after flagship species extirpation, but pre-extirpation effectiveness differed. Cat Tien functioned better than expected, while Nam Et–Phou Louey fell short of expectations, and these trajectories persisted. Ultimately, PA effectiveness was shaped not by flagship species extirpation but rather by the underlying management capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149311746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A multi-objective decision-analysis framework for addressing human–wildlife conflicts","authors":"Vasavi Prakash,&nbsp;Rebecca Lynn Von Hagen,&nbsp;Robert A Gitzen,&nbsp;Bruce A Schulte,&nbsp;Christopher A Lepczyk","doi":"10.1002/fee.70071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70071","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The costs and frequency of negative interactions between people and wildlife (that is, human–wildlife conflict or HWC) are increasing globally and hindering conservation efforts. Practitioners are challenged to manage wildlife populations and consider human health and livelihoods simultaneously. Principles and tools of conservation decision-making can help relevant parties navigate the complexities, uncertainties, and difficult trade-offs involved in managing HWC. To improve access to this potential, we developed a structured decision-making framework for managing HWC that is transparent, locally adaptable, and informed by participatory processes. We illustrate the framework using African savanna elephant (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>), Bengal tiger (<i>Panthera tigris</i>), and white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>) as case studies to demonstrate its utility for conservation planning, rapid prototyping, and early identification of decision constraints. Our framework provides an adaptive approach for promoting human–wildlife coexistence, can aid in the preservation of biodiversity globally, and serves as a tool for managers and practitioners to manage HWC across multiple scales.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149311951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Potential for conflict between urban coyotes and people experiencing unsheltered homelessness","authors":"Sage Raymond,&nbsp;Jeff Rose,&nbsp;Colleen Cassady St Clair","doi":"10.1002/fee.70053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70053","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Across North America, both unsheltered homelessness and human–coyote (<i>Canis latrans</i>) conflict are increasing, but the relationship between these phenomena has not been thoroughly explored. We synthesize literature-based evidence with anecdotal observations that occurred during a 15-year study of coyotes in Edmonton, Canada, to describe three likely types of conflict in the context of unsheltered homelessness. First, people and coyotes often seek similar habitat, increasing opportunities for habituation and competition. Second, food conditioning, which strongly predicts conflict, may occur when coyotes access food in human encampments. Third, use of human-dominated areas caused by habituation and food conditioning may increase human exposure to zoonoses, including the priority disease alveolar echinococcosis. These sources of conflict with coyotes and other wildlife species might be limited by reductions in homelessness and the factors that cause it, wider adoption of interdisciplinary research, improved support for people experiencing homelessness, and education for professionals who engage with the homeless community.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70053","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149312608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Slow ecology","authors":"Nicholas N Dorian,&nbsp;Dylan T Simpson,&nbsp;Kieran N Althaus,&nbsp;Paul J CaraDonna","doi":"10.1002/fee.70077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70077","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Somewhere east of Tucson on Interstate-10 it began to rain, but we didn't ease up. We hurtled at full speed, buzzing on coffee, passing caravans of sixteen wheelers and blurred hills of ocotillo and mesquite. Our truck was loaded with wooden nest boxes for a field experiment to study solitary bees, which we had built with equal urgency. We had bored row after row of holes into beams of yellow pine with a drill bit spinning 1,500 revolutions per minute, sliced those beams into rectangular blocks with blades moving twice as fast, and stuffed the resulting six thousand nesting cavities with paper straws—all at a pace that suggested we were trying to set a new world record.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our pace was justified. We had just three weeks to build the nest boxes in Chicago, drive 2,800 kilometers to Tucson, install the experiment in the desert mountains, and return home in time for the next tasks demanding our attention. As we sped along the highway, it occurred to us that although our frenetic pace felt motivated by our current circumstance, it also felt all too familiar. Our academic lives often feel like one big race to submit grants, collect data, publish papers, and then repeat the process. We reflected on what we might miss along the way—both on our road trip, but also in our practice as ecologists. Speed is an excellent choice if &lt;i&gt;productivity&lt;/i&gt; is the goal, but what choices might we make if we placed equal value on &lt;i&gt;process&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The processes that underpin our work as ecologists—curiosity, attention, inquiry, critical thinking, and reflection—are slow and non-linear, and they grow richer the longer we spend with them. For example, decoding the natural history of other organisms we've studied—why hummingbirds visit atypical flowers, why cellophane bees emerge over many years, why prairie smoke seedlings are so rare—required pursuing many foggy lines of inquiry before reaching clarity. Operating any faster would have risked overlooking the details that matter most. Certainly, like a river cutting downhill, swiftness is required for some tasks, but slowness creates still pools where ideas can hatch. It is impossible to wonder quickly about the natural world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yet, contemporary academia rewards speed; performance metrics emphasize production above all else. Expectations of publishing articles, reviewing submissions, submitting grants, mentoring students, answering emails, teaching courses, and reading an ever-growing mountain of literature create a real sense of urgency. Such a mindset makes it easy to forget the joy of taking one's time, or, even worse, to conclude that taking one's time is indulgent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a system that rewards speed, slowing down is an act of resistance—a choice to move at a different pace. Not to procrastinate, but rather to linger when it is necessary to linger. To sit with uncertainty for uncertainty's sake, instead of rushing to a conclusion. This is easier said than done, and we must do so carefully, and with i","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70077","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149311655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rethinking Environmental Impact Assessment for nature positive development","authors":"Holly Kirk,&nbsp;Dale Wright,&nbsp;Georgia E Garrard,&nbsp;Casey Visintin,&nbsp;Matthew Selinske,&nbsp;Sarah A Bekessy","doi":"10.1002/fee.70068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70068","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Achieving “nature positive” development within existing regulatory frameworks will be challenging. Halting and reversing biodiversity loss requires protection, restoration, and enhancement of ecosystems alongside a fundamental shift in how biodiversity is valued and quantifiable improvements are assessed. A new approach is needed because traditional Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) focused on mitigating negative impacts will not promote positive outcomes. We propose an additional EIA pathway that assesses the potential for biodiversity gains at development sites, reframing biodiversity as an asset to be enhanced, rather than as a problem to avoid. By adding the identification of biodiversity-enhancing opportunities to development planning, this approach encourages actions that support sustainable and resilient ecosystems, providing a clearer link to the social and economic benefits that can also be accumulated. Through two hypothetical case studies, we illustrate how this nature positive pathway identifies biodiversity potential. We also discuss how developers may be incentivized to align with the global nature positive agenda</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149084117","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Justice for biodiversity: an X-curve transformation pathway for a sustainable future","authors":"Camille PA Venier-Cambron","doi":"10.1002/fee.70062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70062","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Decades of conservation action have failed to stem biodiversity loss, stimulating heated debates over which conservation strategies are the most effective. Do we focus on preserving sufficient wilderness, maintaining services from nature for societal well-being, or protecting vulnerable socioecologies from injustice? Despite the apparent rivalry between these three agendas, their underlying values—ecological resilience, social prosperity, and freedom from harm—are not mutually exclusive. In this study, the X-curve framework is used to help imagine a transformation pathway for a future that not only protects but also systemically advances all three of these goals. Doing so demonstrates the potential complementarity between approaches, as well as the need for coordinated engagement with other transformative agendas, such as environmental justice movements. Outcomes can be supported through decentralized environmental governance and a more equitable political economy, highlighting that the protection of land and land rights is only the first step.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70062","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149084197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Toward a research agenda for actionable ecological science","authors":"Diane E Pataki,&nbsp;Peter M Groffman,&nbsp;Austin Himes,&nbsp;Matt S Schuler,&nbsp;Lilli Kaarakka,&nbsp;Matthew A McCary,&nbsp;Danielle Ignace,&nbsp;Nalini Rao","doi":"10.1002/fee.70060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70060","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Since January 2025, the content and process of science in the US have been subject to much discussion and debate. This ferment has caused many of us to think deeply about the value of our science and how it benefits society.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Ecological Society of America (ESA) has a long history of developing community-wide, consensus agendas for ecological research that provide societal benefits. In 1991, the Sustainable Biosphere Initiative developed a framework to prioritize ecological research topics related to global change, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable ecological systems. In 2002, the Ecological Visions Project further updated and advanced community research priorities in ecological sustainability; and later, in 2009, the Earth Stewardship Initiative focused on the actionability of ecological science by identifying the knowledge needed for global stewardship.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To consider the future of ecology in the current social and political context of science in the US and beyond, we now have a new initiative: the &lt;i&gt;ESA Task Force to Establish a Research Agenda in Actionable Ecological Science&lt;/i&gt; (hereafter, “task force”). While contemplating ways to bring the ESA community together to discuss a future research agenda, the task force—composed of a small group of ESA members—posed pressing questions: How has ecology as a discipline contributed to societal and environmental problem-solving in the past? Are decision-makers and the general public aware of these successes? What are current best practices for conducting actionable ecological research? What are the most urgent and important societal challenges that can be informed by advances in ecological science? How can we foster dialogue across a broader group of ecologists and practitioners outside the task force?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To address these questions, the task force held a Special Session at the 2025 ESA annual meeting in Baltimore and developed a survey asking ESA members to rank choices associated with three overarching questions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(1) What are the most urgent research directions in ecology for climate adaptation and/or mitigation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(2) What are the most urgent research directions in ecology to address habitat and biodiversity loss?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(3) What are the most urgent research priorities for helping to ensure a fair distribution of ecological amenities and benefits?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although we intend to publish a more detailed analysis, including methods and results, from the survey elsewhere, here we briefly summarize the initial 56 responses received. Most respondents (61%) were from a college or university, followed by 20% from non-profit organizations, and 9% from the federal government. With respect to career stage, 33% of respondents self-identified as mid-career, 25% as early career, 18% as students, and 21.5% as retired and/or emeritus. Some key responses from those initial participants are provided below:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Holistic solutions that consider and address multiple, interacting i","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149084196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legacy effects of redlining on the distribution of greenspaces in US cities","authors":"Travis Gallo,&nbsp;Mason Fidino,&nbsp;Christopher J Schell,&nbsp;Marccus D Hendricks,&nbsp;Seth B Magle","doi":"10.1002/fee.70056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70056","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated how a discriminatory housing policy—redlining—has shaped the spatial patterns and configurations of greenspaces throughout 177 cities in the contiguous US. Housing segregation has been a long-term development practice that has sequestered communities of color to areas with elevated environmental and public health risks. Although the lasting environmental, social, and economic impacts of redlining are clear, the impact of redlining on landscapes is still unfolding. In neighborhoods that were historically redlined, we found that (i) less overall greenspace was available, (ii) individual greenspaces were smaller and less connected, and (iii) residents belonged predominantly to communities of color and/or households had lower income. Thus, the legacy of redlining can be seen in the modern spatial patterns of urban greenspaces, and ecosystem services provided by greenspaces have been systematically absent from redlined communities for decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70056","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"149084049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Maslow's hierarchy of needs rests on ecological security","authors":"Noa Steiner,&nbsp;Tamar Dayan","doi":"10.1002/fee.70051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70051","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs, a highly recognized human motivational theory, stipulates that achieving human self-actualization depends on fulfilling basic needs—physiological needs; safety needs; love and belonging; and self-esteem. All of these needs are inherently linked to ecological integrity, biodiversity, and a healthy environment. Yet, this connection is not made explicit under Maslow's framework, often driving a misperception that securing a safe environment is a “nice to have” motivation once all basic needs have been met. Doing so ignores crucial interactions between these needs and the environment, influencing decision-making priorities and perceptions of risk at all levels within the hierarchy of needs, which is often depicted as a pyramid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nature conservation narratives and the terminology used therein have evolved over time. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment highlighted links between ecosystems and human well-being through the ecosystem services concept. The IPBES conceptual framework expanded this concept to also include “nature's contributions to people” and “nature's gifts” to achieve a good quality of life, integrating Indigenous and diverse values of nature, while addressing critiques that the ecosystem services concept marginalizes the intrinsic value of nature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This terminology of services, gifts, and contributions mostly puts the burden of proof (on determining how much there is to gain) onto the ecosystem assessments’ knowledge production and synthesis, thereby directly linking biodiversity with specific ecosystem services; nevertheless, such linkages are often incomplete and uncertain, and at times focus on the conversion of ecological and biophysical phenomena into economic terms. These assessments are important tools to advance science and our understanding of complex processes and dependencies. However, additional tools are needed for showcasing how biodiversity and its complex processes act as a mediator, underlying most physiological and personal safety considerations of basic human needs. Integrating environmental and ecological dimensions through a safety and security lens is therefore essential.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Inside Maslow's hierarchy, or five-level pyramid, the two foundational (bottom-most) layers are occupied by &lt;b&gt;physiological needs&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;safety needs&lt;/b&gt;, both of which rely on a healthy environment and a high degree of ecological integrity. With its complex processes, thriving biodiversity supports these needs and is thus, in and of itself, a basic need. Clean water and air required to fulfill physiological and safety needs are both dependent on diverse and healthy ecosystems, which maintain the necessary regulatory functions through effective management of resources and waste.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Maintaining healthy fish populations, for example, is important not only for ecology and conservation but also for nutritional security and resource independence of small-scale fishing and coastal communitie","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70051","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148862387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ancient practices enhance biodiversity conservation: Evidence from village fengshui forests","authors":"Cheng Jin,&nbsp;Siwei Hu,&nbsp;Lihua Zhou,&nbsp;Li Huang,&nbsp;C.Y. Jim,&nbsp;Jesse Minor,&nbsp;Tien Ming Lee,&nbsp;Yongchuan Yang","doi":"10.1002/fee.70066","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>By acting as potential candidates for other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), village <i>fengshui</i> forests demonstrate how community-based management sustains regional biodiversity in China. Nevertheless, limited information on the nationwide distribution and biodiversity conservation effectiveness of these forests has hindered their integration as OECMs. We compiled a national database of 811 village <i>fengshui</i> forests, detailing their geographical coordinates, species composition, and areal extents. We found that these forests were widely distributed across southern China and were mostly independent from formal nature reserves. Although village <i>fengshui</i> forests exhibited higher human footprint indices and were smaller in area than formal nature reserves, they harbored diverse plant communities, primarily remnant patches of evergreen broadleaf forests. They also provided refugia for 60 rare and endangered tree species, including 24 relict species in subtropical humid habitats. Our findings highlight the potential role of village <i>fengshui</i> forests in biodiversity conservation outside of formal nature reserves, and how they contribute to the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"24 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"148862541","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}