Andrew S MacDougall, Ellen H Esch, Aleksandra J Dolezal, Caroline Kamm, Oliver H Carroll, Micaela Tosi, Kevin MacColl, Mark Nessel, Annika Wilcox, Lake Ellsworth, Annalisa CM Mazzorato, Daniel Noble, Matthew Pavusa, Samantha Ramirez, Bernal J Arce, Marie Gutgesell, Kevin S McCann, Evan DG Fraser, John M Fryxell, Bryan Gilvesy, Katherine Balpataky, Jana Levison, Asim Biswas, Kari Dunfield, Neil Rooney, Hafiz Maherali, Amy Newman, Brian C Husband, Dirk Steinke, Jeremy DeWaard, Genevieve Ali, Ryan Prosser, Andrew Young, Hugh J Earl, John Sulik, Eric Harvey, Malcolm M Campbell
{"title":"恢复边缘农田生态系统服务功能研究","authors":"Andrew S MacDougall, Ellen H Esch, Aleksandra J Dolezal, Caroline Kamm, Oliver H Carroll, Micaela Tosi, Kevin MacColl, Mark Nessel, Annika Wilcox, Lake Ellsworth, Annalisa CM Mazzorato, Daniel Noble, Matthew Pavusa, Samantha Ramirez, Bernal J Arce, Marie Gutgesell, Kevin S McCann, Evan DG Fraser, John M Fryxell, Bryan Gilvesy, Katherine Balpataky, Jana Levison, Asim Biswas, Kari Dunfield, Neil Rooney, Hafiz Maherali, Amy Newman, Brian C Husband, Dirk Steinke, Jeremy DeWaard, Genevieve Ali, Ryan Prosser, Andrew Young, Hugh J Earl, John Sulik, Eric Harvey, Malcolm M Campbell","doi":"10.1002/fee.2866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Industrialized agriculture often uses marginal-land restoration to reduce environmental impacts, seeking to generate ecosystem services while maintaining food production on better soils. Here, we describe benefit trajectories for biodiversity, nutrient retention, and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation up to a decade after conversion of marginal farmlands to grasslands or wetlands. Even in small areas that were restored, biodiversity increased across most trophic levels, driven by colonization of non-agronomic taxa. Nutrient retention by grassland buffers was substantive but seasonal, with losses common outside of the growing season. Although initial SOC gains were modest, a 20-fold increase in recalcitrant root biomass to a depth of 60 cm suggests that SOC storage will accelerate. Overall, even if it were unable to unilaterally and immediately offset nutrient pollution or SOC loss, restoration created multiple benefits. Marginal-land restoration can serve as a necessary and critical component to improved sustainable intensification, especially if partnered with on-field crop management targeting nutrient retention and SOC accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem services on restored marginal farmland\",\"authors\":\"Andrew S MacDougall, Ellen H Esch, Aleksandra J Dolezal, Caroline Kamm, Oliver H Carroll, Micaela Tosi, Kevin MacColl, Mark Nessel, Annika Wilcox, Lake Ellsworth, Annalisa CM Mazzorato, Daniel Noble, Matthew Pavusa, Samantha Ramirez, Bernal J Arce, Marie Gutgesell, Kevin S McCann, Evan DG Fraser, John M Fryxell, Bryan Gilvesy, Katherine Balpataky, Jana Levison, Asim Biswas, Kari Dunfield, Neil Rooney, Hafiz Maherali, Amy Newman, Brian C Husband, Dirk Steinke, Jeremy DeWaard, Genevieve Ali, Ryan Prosser, Andrew Young, Hugh J Earl, John Sulik, Eric Harvey, Malcolm M Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fee.2866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Industrialized agriculture often uses marginal-land restoration to reduce environmental impacts, seeking to generate ecosystem services while maintaining food production on better soils. Here, we describe benefit trajectories for biodiversity, nutrient retention, and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation up to a decade after conversion of marginal farmlands to grasslands or wetlands. Even in small areas that were restored, biodiversity increased across most trophic levels, driven by colonization of non-agronomic taxa. Nutrient retention by grassland buffers was substantive but seasonal, with losses common outside of the growing season. Although initial SOC gains were modest, a 20-fold increase in recalcitrant root biomass to a depth of 60 cm suggests that SOC storage will accelerate. Overall, even if it were unable to unilaterally and immediately offset nutrient pollution or SOC loss, restoration created multiple benefits. Marginal-land restoration can serve as a necessary and critical component to improved sustainable intensification, especially if partnered with on-field crop management targeting nutrient retention and SOC accumulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"23 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2866\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2866","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Industrialized agriculture often uses marginal-land restoration to reduce environmental impacts, seeking to generate ecosystem services while maintaining food production on better soils. Here, we describe benefit trajectories for biodiversity, nutrient retention, and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation up to a decade after conversion of marginal farmlands to grasslands or wetlands. Even in small areas that were restored, biodiversity increased across most trophic levels, driven by colonization of non-agronomic taxa. Nutrient retention by grassland buffers was substantive but seasonal, with losses common outside of the growing season. Although initial SOC gains were modest, a 20-fold increase in recalcitrant root biomass to a depth of 60 cm suggests that SOC storage will accelerate. Overall, even if it were unable to unilaterally and immediately offset nutrient pollution or SOC loss, restoration created multiple benefits. Marginal-land restoration can serve as a necessary and critical component to improved sustainable intensification, especially if partnered with on-field crop management targeting nutrient retention and SOC accumulation.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas.
The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available.
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.