Sparse genetic data limit biodiversity assessments in protected areas globally

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ivan Paz-Vinas, Amy G Vandergast, Chloé Schmidt, Deborah M Leigh, Simon Blanchet, René D Clark, Eric D Crandall, Hanne De Kort, Jeff Falgout, Colin J Garroway, Eleana Karachaliou, Francine Kershaw, David O’Brien, Malin L Pinsky, Gernot Segelbacher, Rachel H Toczydlowski, Margaret E Hunter
{"title":"Sparse genetic data limit biodiversity assessments in protected areas globally","authors":"Ivan Paz-Vinas,&nbsp;Amy G Vandergast,&nbsp;Chloé Schmidt,&nbsp;Deborah M Leigh,&nbsp;Simon Blanchet,&nbsp;René D Clark,&nbsp;Eric D Crandall,&nbsp;Hanne De Kort,&nbsp;Jeff Falgout,&nbsp;Colin J Garroway,&nbsp;Eleana Karachaliou,&nbsp;Francine Kershaw,&nbsp;David O’Brien,&nbsp;Malin L Pinsky,&nbsp;Gernot Segelbacher,&nbsp;Rachel H Toczydlowski,&nbsp;Margaret E Hunter","doi":"10.1002/fee.2867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Global conservation targets include protecting genetic diversity within species. Yet few studies have assessed whether protected areas (PAs) include genetically diverse populations across species globally. A first step is understanding the availability of population genetic data that could be used in these assessments. We surveyed georeferenced population-level nuclear (as opposed to mitochondrial or plastid-based) genetic data across continents and marine biomes (36,354 populations, 2809 species) and found substantial geographic and taxonomic gaps. Most data were concentrated in Europe and North America, with major gaps in Africa and Asia. For most taxonomic groups, data were available for &lt;1% of described species. Globally, 52.08% of the total areal extent of PAs lacked genetically sampled populations. These gaps in data availability highlight the need for targeted genetic data collection, harmonization, and sharing to improve genetic diversity monitoring and conservation planning. Combined with proxy-based genetic indicators, such data are needed to inform PA assessments, bolster area-based conservation initiatives like 30 × 30, and support achievement of global genetic conservation targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.2867","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2867","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global conservation targets include protecting genetic diversity within species. Yet few studies have assessed whether protected areas (PAs) include genetically diverse populations across species globally. A first step is understanding the availability of population genetic data that could be used in these assessments. We surveyed georeferenced population-level nuclear (as opposed to mitochondrial or plastid-based) genetic data across continents and marine biomes (36,354 populations, 2809 species) and found substantial geographic and taxonomic gaps. Most data were concentrated in Europe and North America, with major gaps in Africa and Asia. For most taxonomic groups, data were available for <1% of described species. Globally, 52.08% of the total areal extent of PAs lacked genetically sampled populations. These gaps in data availability highlight the need for targeted genetic data collection, harmonization, and sharing to improve genetic diversity monitoring and conservation planning. Combined with proxy-based genetic indicators, such data are needed to inform PA assessments, bolster area-based conservation initiatives like 30 × 30, and support achievement of global genetic conservation targets.

Abstract Image

稀疏的遗传数据限制了全球保护区的生物多样性评估
全球保护目标包括保护物种内的遗传多样性。然而,很少有研究评估保护区(PAs)是否包括全球物种的遗传多样性种群。第一步是了解可用于这些评估的种群遗传数据的可用性。我们调查了大陆和海洋生物群系(36,354个种群,2809个物种)的地理参考种群水平核(与线粒体或基于质体的)遗传数据,发现了大量的地理和分类差距。大多数数据集中在欧洲和北美,非洲和亚洲存在较大差距。对于大多数分类类群,有1%的已描述物种的数据可用。在全球范围内,52.08%的保护区面积范围缺乏遗传采样群体。这些数据可用性方面的差距突出表明,需要有针对性地收集、协调和共享遗传数据,以改善遗传多样性监测和保护规划。与基于代理的遗传指标相结合,这些数据需要为PA评估提供信息,支持基于区域的保护计划,如30 × 30,并支持实现全球遗传保护目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信