从科学到政策:不断发展的海洋生物多样性目标

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Jan-Claas Dajka, Anne K Eilrich, Andrea Franke, Benjamin S Halpern, Bernadette Snow, Amanda T Lombard, Ute Jacob, Silke Laakmann, Amelie Luhede, Helmut Hillebrand
{"title":"从科学到政策:不断发展的海洋生物多样性目标","authors":"Jan-Claas Dajka,&nbsp;Anne K Eilrich,&nbsp;Andrea Franke,&nbsp;Benjamin S Halpern,&nbsp;Bernadette Snow,&nbsp;Amanda T Lombard,&nbsp;Ute Jacob,&nbsp;Silke Laakmann,&nbsp;Amelie Luhede,&nbsp;Helmut Hillebrand","doi":"10.1002/fee.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Montreal-Kunming Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) substantially advances biodiversity protection. We systematically reviewed the scholarly literature published during the UN Decade on Biodiversity (2010–2020) to assess whether GBF targets align with scientific approaches and improve upon the Aichi Targets in recognizing the complexity of marine biodiversity. Our findings showed that the new targets have improved to address the full suite of essential biodiversity variable (EBV) classes, reducing the risk of changes in crucial aspects of biodiversity being overlooked. We observed a high degree of alignment between research and policy in EBVs and a relative increase in the reliance of the GBF on secondary variables such as ecosystem function. While this alignment mirrors that within other global frameworks, we caution against overemphasizing secondary variables at the expense of foundational variables such as community composition. Our analysis demonstrates that global policy targets align well with scientific understanding of marine biodiversity. Future efforts should focus on improving national-level implementation and refining indicators to foster transformative change in biodiversity conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From science to policy: evolving marine biodiversity targets\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Claas Dajka,&nbsp;Anne K Eilrich,&nbsp;Andrea Franke,&nbsp;Benjamin S Halpern,&nbsp;Bernadette Snow,&nbsp;Amanda T Lombard,&nbsp;Ute Jacob,&nbsp;Silke Laakmann,&nbsp;Amelie Luhede,&nbsp;Helmut Hillebrand\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fee.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Montreal-Kunming Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) substantially advances biodiversity protection. We systematically reviewed the scholarly literature published during the UN Decade on Biodiversity (2010–2020) to assess whether GBF targets align with scientific approaches and improve upon the Aichi Targets in recognizing the complexity of marine biodiversity. Our findings showed that the new targets have improved to address the full suite of essential biodiversity variable (EBV) classes, reducing the risk of changes in crucial aspects of biodiversity being overlooked. We observed a high degree of alignment between research and policy in EBVs and a relative increase in the reliance of the GBF on secondary variables such as ecosystem function. While this alignment mirrors that within other global frameworks, we caution against overemphasizing secondary variables at the expense of foundational variables such as community composition. Our analysis demonstrates that global policy targets align well with scientific understanding of marine biodiversity. Future efforts should focus on improving national-level implementation and refining indicators to foster transformative change in biodiversity conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fee.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.70000\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.70000","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒙特利尔-昆明全球生物多样性框架(GBF)实质性推进了生物多样性保护。我们系统地回顾了联合国生物多样性十年(2010-2020)期间发表的学术文献,以评估GBF目标是否符合科学方法,并在认识到海洋生物多样性复杂性方面改进了爱知目标。我们的研究结果表明,新的目标已经改进,以解决全套基本生物多样性变量(EBV)类别,降低了生物多样性关键方面的变化被忽视的风险。我们观察到ebv研究与政策之间的高度一致性,以及GBF对生态系统功能等次要变量的依赖相对增加。虽然这种一致性反映了其他全球框架中的情况,但我们警告不要以牺牲社区构成等基本变量为代价过度强调次要变量。我们的分析表明,全球政策目标与对海洋生物多样性的科学理解是一致的。未来的努力应侧重于改善国家层面的实施和完善指标,以促进生物多样性保护方面的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

From science to policy: evolving marine biodiversity targets

From science to policy: evolving marine biodiversity targets

The Montreal-Kunming Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) substantially advances biodiversity protection. We systematically reviewed the scholarly literature published during the UN Decade on Biodiversity (2010–2020) to assess whether GBF targets align with scientific approaches and improve upon the Aichi Targets in recognizing the complexity of marine biodiversity. Our findings showed that the new targets have improved to address the full suite of essential biodiversity variable (EBV) classes, reducing the risk of changes in crucial aspects of biodiversity being overlooked. We observed a high degree of alignment between research and policy in EBVs and a relative increase in the reliance of the GBF on secondary variables such as ecosystem function. While this alignment mirrors that within other global frameworks, we caution against overemphasizing secondary variables at the expense of foundational variables such as community composition. Our analysis demonstrates that global policy targets align well with scientific understanding of marine biodiversity. Future efforts should focus on improving national-level implementation and refining indicators to foster transformative change in biodiversity conservation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信