Ecosystem services on restored marginal farmland

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Andrew S MacDougall, Ellen H Esch, Aleksandra J Dolezal, Caroline Kamm, Oliver H Carroll, Micaela Tosi, Kevin MacColl, Mark Nessel, Annika Wilcox, Lake Ellsworth, Annalisa CM Mazzorato, Daniel Noble, Matthew Pavusa, Samantha Ramirez, Bernal J Arce, Marie Gutgesell, Kevin S McCann, Evan DG Fraser, John M Fryxell, Bryan Gilvesy, Katherine Balpataky, Jana Levison, Asim Biswas, Kari Dunfield, Neil Rooney, Hafiz Maherali, Amy Newman, Brian C Husband, Dirk Steinke, Jeremy DeWaard, Genevieve Ali, Ryan Prosser, Andrew Young, Hugh J Earl, John Sulik, Eric Harvey, Malcolm M Campbell
{"title":"Ecosystem services on restored marginal farmland","authors":"Andrew S MacDougall,&nbsp;Ellen H Esch,&nbsp;Aleksandra J Dolezal,&nbsp;Caroline Kamm,&nbsp;Oliver H Carroll,&nbsp;Micaela Tosi,&nbsp;Kevin MacColl,&nbsp;Mark Nessel,&nbsp;Annika Wilcox,&nbsp;Lake Ellsworth,&nbsp;Annalisa CM Mazzorato,&nbsp;Daniel Noble,&nbsp;Matthew Pavusa,&nbsp;Samantha Ramirez,&nbsp;Bernal J Arce,&nbsp;Marie Gutgesell,&nbsp;Kevin S McCann,&nbsp;Evan DG Fraser,&nbsp;John M Fryxell,&nbsp;Bryan Gilvesy,&nbsp;Katherine Balpataky,&nbsp;Jana Levison,&nbsp;Asim Biswas,&nbsp;Kari Dunfield,&nbsp;Neil Rooney,&nbsp;Hafiz Maherali,&nbsp;Amy Newman,&nbsp;Brian C Husband,&nbsp;Dirk Steinke,&nbsp;Jeremy DeWaard,&nbsp;Genevieve Ali,&nbsp;Ryan Prosser,&nbsp;Andrew Young,&nbsp;Hugh J Earl,&nbsp;John Sulik,&nbsp;Eric Harvey,&nbsp;Malcolm M Campbell","doi":"10.1002/fee.2866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Industrialized agriculture often uses marginal-land restoration to reduce environmental impacts, seeking to generate ecosystem services while maintaining food production on better soils. Here, we describe benefit trajectories for biodiversity, nutrient retention, and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation up to a decade after conversion of marginal farmlands to grasslands or wetlands. Even in small areas that were restored, biodiversity increased across most trophic levels, driven by colonization of non-agronomic taxa. Nutrient retention by grassland buffers was substantive but seasonal, with losses common outside of the growing season. Although initial SOC gains were modest, a 20-fold increase in recalcitrant root biomass to a depth of 60 cm suggests that SOC storage will accelerate. Overall, even if it were unable to unilaterally and immediately offset nutrient pollution or SOC loss, restoration created multiple benefits. Marginal-land restoration can serve as a necessary and critical component to improved sustainable intensification, especially if partnered with on-field crop management targeting nutrient retention and SOC accumulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":171,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","volume":"23 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fee.2866","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Industrialized agriculture often uses marginal-land restoration to reduce environmental impacts, seeking to generate ecosystem services while maintaining food production on better soils. Here, we describe benefit trajectories for biodiversity, nutrient retention, and soil organic carbon (SOC) accumulation up to a decade after conversion of marginal farmlands to grasslands or wetlands. Even in small areas that were restored, biodiversity increased across most trophic levels, driven by colonization of non-agronomic taxa. Nutrient retention by grassland buffers was substantive but seasonal, with losses common outside of the growing season. Although initial SOC gains were modest, a 20-fold increase in recalcitrant root biomass to a depth of 60 cm suggests that SOC storage will accelerate. Overall, even if it were unable to unilaterally and immediately offset nutrient pollution or SOC loss, restoration created multiple benefits. Marginal-land restoration can serve as a necessary and critical component to improved sustainable intensification, especially if partnered with on-field crop management targeting nutrient retention and SOC accumulation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

恢复边缘农田生态系统服务功能研究
工业化农业经常利用边缘土地恢复来减少对环境的影响,寻求在提供生态系统服务的同时,在更好的土壤上保持粮食生产。在这里,我们描述了边际农田转化为草地或湿地后长达十年的生物多样性、养分保持和土壤有机碳(SOC)积累的效益轨迹。即使在恢复的小区域,在非农业分类群殖民化的推动下,生物多样性在大多数营养水平上都有所增加。草地缓冲层的养分保留是实质性的,但具有季节性,在生长季节之外的损失是常见的。虽然最初的有机碳收益不大,但在深度为60 cm时,根系生物量增加20倍,表明有机碳储存将加速。总的来说,即使它不能单方面和立即抵消养分污染或有机碳损失,恢复也产生了多重效益。边缘土地恢复可以作为改善可持续集约化的必要和关键组成部分,特别是如果与以养分保持和有机碳积累为目标的田间作物管理相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.30
自引率
1.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
9-18 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is a publication by the Ecological Society of America that focuses on the significance of ecology and environmental science in various aspects of research and problem-solving. The journal covers topics such as biodiversity conservation, ecosystem preservation, natural resource management, public policy, and other related areas. The publication features a range of content, including peer-reviewed articles, editorials, commentaries, letters, and occasional special issues and topical series. It releases ten issues per year, excluding January and July. ESA members receive both print and electronic copies of the journal, while institutional subscriptions are also available. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment is highly regarded in the field, as indicated by its ranking in the 2021 Journal Citation Reports by Clarivate Analytics. The journal is ranked 4th out of 174 in ecology journals and 11th out of 279 in environmental sciences journals. Its impact factor for 2021 is reported as 13.789, which further demonstrates its influence and importance in the scientific community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信