Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Izmeklēšanas noslēpuma un cietušā tiesību uz informāciju sadursme pirmstiesas kriminālprocesā
Dāvids Gurevičs
{"title":"Izmeklēšanas noslēpuma un cietušā tiesību uz informāciju sadursme pirmstiesas kriminālprocesā","authors":"Dāvids Gurevičs","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.37","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.37","url":null,"abstract":"The victim’s right to receive information during criminal proceedings is aimed at ensuring protection of the victim’s interests in a fair regulation of criminal legal relations. However, the institute of the secret of investigation as a means to protect impartiality of the proceedings and the offender’s right to a fair trial, limits the victim’s ability to be informed. This paper attempts to identify a reasonable balance between the victim’s right to information and the secret of investigation.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131819387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ieskats Krimināllikuma Vispārīgās daļas attīstības procesā
Uldis Krastiņš
{"title":"Ieskats Krimināllikuma Vispārīgās daļas attīstības procesā","authors":"Uldis Krastiņš","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.01","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides an analysis of several amendments to Chapter II “Criminal Offences” of the General Part of the Criminal Law, which were introduced since its entry into force on 1 April 1999. The article shows the necessity, the process of formation, as well as substantiation of the legal norms, based on the psychological concept approach which is laid down in Section 8 paragraph two of the Criminal Law.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122237268","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Apbūves tiesības nodibināšanas problemātiskie aspekti
Erlens Kalniņš
{"title":"Apbūves tiesības nodibināšanas problemātiskie aspekti","authors":"Erlens Kalniņš","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.12","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the main conditions and limitations for the establishment of the right of superficies, providing an evaluation about certain problematic aspects thereof from the perspective of comparative law, as well as exploring the right of superficies institute regarding the possibility to attribute such right to a building that has already been constructed, thereby ensuring such building’s further usage and at the same time recognizing that such building is to be deemed as an essential part of the respective right to superficies that has been granted.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124004084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Covid-19 pandēmijas pieredze pamattiesību ierobežojumu kontekstā – Ministru kabineta 2021. gada 9. oktobra Rīkojuma “Par ārkārtējās situācijas izsludināšanu” Nr. 720 5.3. apakšpunkts
Sandra Sondore
{"title":"Covid-19 pandēmijas pieredze pamattiesību ierobežojumu kontekstā – Ministru kabineta 2021. gada 9. oktobra Rīkojuma “Par ārkārtējās situācijas izsludināšanu” Nr. 720 5.3. apakšpunkts","authors":"Sandra Sondore","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.31","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the current article is, by analysing the experience of the state of emergency brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic, to contribute to clarifying the frame of actions and powers of government, determining significant restrictions of fundamental rights (the right of individuals to private life and the right to freely choose an occupation) in emergency situations related to the pandemic. The task of the current paper is, by applying the criteria and methodology for evaluating the permissibility of restrictions of fundamental rights, to assess whether the actions of the government of Latvia, implementing the restrictions of fundamental rights (namely, the requirement for a COVID-19 interoperable certificate in legal relations for all employees in the public sector) were legitimate, necessary and proportionate.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123070620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Satversmes tiesas loma modernās demokrātijas harmonizēšanā
Iveta Pazare
{"title":"Satversmes tiesas loma modernās demokrātijas harmonizēšanā","authors":"Iveta Pazare","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.43","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.43","url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the role of the constitutional review and the constitutional court in the harmonisation of modern democracy through the prism of various aspects, including newly created theories, principles, tests and other legal methods. The article will look at the dynamics of constitutional control exercised by the Constitutional Court of Latvia and the methods applied to it, as well as developments in constitutional control in times of challenges and threats to modern democracy. The thesis set out in the paper is an insight into a much broader theme that will be discussed in greater detail in the doctoral thesis by the author of the paper.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"344 3‐4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120837884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pierādījumu iesniegšanas ierobežojumi un pieļaujamība apelācijas instancē
Daina Ose
{"title":"Pierādījumu iesniegšanas ierobežojumi un pieļaujamība apelācijas instancē","authors":"Daina Ose","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.13","url":null,"abstract":"Submission and assessment of evidence is one of the elements of the right to a fair trial, which must be ensured when reviewing a case in the court of first instance, as well as in cases provided for by law and to a certain extent in the appeal instance. Submission of evidence at the appeal instance is permitted only in exceptional cases, and under the condition that its non-submission at the first instance did not depend on the will of the parties to the case. Studying court practice shows that it is currently not possible to change the existing regulation of the law and refuse to present new evidence at the appeal instance. This would leave an undesirable impression on the court’s duty to find a more correct and fair solution to disputes, as well as violate the rights of persons to a fair trial.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"230 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117156246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patērētāja lēmuma autonomijas ievērošana digitālajā vidē: pierādīšanas pienākums
Zanda Dāvida
{"title":"Patērētāja lēmuma autonomijas ievērošana digitālajā vidē: pierādīšanas pienākums","authors":"Zanda Dāvida","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.17","url":null,"abstract":"In the last decade, the digitalization of the consumer market has given opportunities to performer of commercial practices to effectively influence the autonomy of the consumer’s decision. The digital economy has developed many different types of commercial practices that nudge consumers to make transactional decisions that are contrary to their interests, such as dark patterns. Currently, the most important legal instrument for the protection of consumer decision autonomy in the European Union is the regulation of the prohibition of unfair commercial practices. However, the new challenges reduce the effectiveness of regulation. The article analyses one of the current legal problems – the compliance of the burden of the proof model with the reality of the digital environment. The article argues that the model is not suitable for ensuring a high level of protection of consumer decision autonomy in the digital economy, therefore the regulation of the unfair commercial practices’ prohibition should be changed radically.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125388046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kreditors mantojuma lietā
Alise Reide
{"title":"Kreditors mantojuma lietā","authors":"Alise Reide","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.16","url":null,"abstract":"According to Article 382 of the Latvian Civil Law that includes the principle of universal succession, an estate is the whole and it comprises all immovable and movable property, as well as transferable rights and obligations. Thus, a person involved in an inheritance case might also be a creditor who has an interest to receive a fulfilment of an obligation either from the estate as the whole based on Article 383 or an heir, if the heir has accepted the inheritance based on Article 705 of the Latvian Civil Law. Therefore, the author reveals the meaning of the term “creditor” in the inheritance case and analyses the most important rights and duties of the creditor in the inheritance case.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129239277","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zvērināta notāra pienākums novērtēt rīcībspēju cilvēkiem ar garīga rakstura traucējumiem
Laura Kadile
{"title":"Zvērināta notāra pienākums novērtēt rīcībspēju cilvēkiem ar garīga rakstura traucējumiem","authors":"Laura Kadile","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.19","url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the legal obligation of notaries to assess the capacity of persons before concluding a notarial act. In particular, it examines how legal doctrine and case law reveal the procedure for complying with this obligation in Latvia, focusing on the possible challenges of assessing the capacity of persons with mental disabilities. The German legal framework concerning this topic is also addressed. The key idea proposed by the article is that compliance with the obligation should not be declaratory, thereby jeopardising the protection of mentally disabled persons in a legal transaction. It is necessary to establish a mechanism for the assessment of capacity to act in order to ensure that the obligation to assess capacity is implemented in a consistent manner.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127532710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parlamentārās kontroles nozīme pamattiesību aizsardzībā
Aleksandrs Kuzņecovs
{"title":"Parlamentārās kontroles nozīme pamattiesību aizsardzībā","authors":"Aleksandrs Kuzņecovs","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.29","url":null,"abstract":"Parliament’s role in promoting of human rights cannot be overlooked either historically, or today. Parliaments were the first institutions, which started to promote human rights, especially at the era when judiciaries were appointed by the monarch and executives were fully controlled by royalty. Nowadays, human rights protection is predominantly entrusted to the judiciary, which by enjoying independence from executive power, holds the main safeguard position in promotion of human rights. However, the role of parliaments in protection of human rights should not be underestimated. First and foremost, parliamentarians are those in power who can be proactive in human rights protection not just within the legislative powers, but also in executing parliamentary control over the public administration. Courts are authorised to adjudicate individual cases only on the basis of action of individual, whilst parliaments can tackle systemic violations of human rights by means of parliamentary control, which can be addressed towards local authorities, as well as high-level officials of the executive power. Moreover, parliaments have extensive discretion in evaluating the actions of governmental officials, which can manifest itself as a removal of official from the position, executing parliamentary inquiry or even performing legislative parliamentary control.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133498328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信