{"title":"“Saindētā koka augļu” doktrīnas izpratne pierādījumu pieļaujamības izvērtējumā Latvijas tiesu praksē","authors":"Linda Lielbriede","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.46","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.46","url":null,"abstract":"The “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine is associated with the common law system, developing a special concept to make evidence inadmissible in court if it has been derived from the evidence that has been illegally obtained. In other jurisdictions, the application of the aforementioned doctrine has not been perceived unambiguously. In Latvia, the legislator has refrained from recognizing this doctrine; the Supreme Court likewise so far has not confirmed the application of the said doctrine, although in practice the issue of admissibility of evidence is relevant in every criminal trial.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131444784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Pacta sunt servanda principa attīstība romiešu tiesībās","authors":"Germans Pavlovskis","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.05","url":null,"abstract":"The article provides a scientific insight into the sources of Article 1587 of the Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia and their role in the development of pacta sunt servanda principle. The article presents an insight into evolvement of pacts in Roman law and during the reception of Roman law, including an assessment of the influence of canon law on the development of the pacta sunt servanda principle as a basis of the principle of freedom of contract and its role in overcoming the numerus clausus principle in Roman contract law. Finally, an analysis of particular law sources is presented, demonstrating a common approach to the reception of Roman law in the south-west of Germany and the Baltic provinces.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123617800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Profesionālā dienesta līguma izbeigšana pirms termiņa, pusēm vienojoties: valsts imperatīvās militārās intereses versus cilvēka pamattiesības","authors":"Viktorija Katajeva","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.30","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is twofold: to analyse the specifics of the termination of professional service contract before the end of the term; and to find out whether such basis as the legislator’s political decision to limit the fundamental rights defined in Article 106 of the Constitution is justified, due to state’s imperative military interests. The author concludes that an unjustified refusal of the institution to agree on the termination of the professional service contract before the end of the term does not comply with the principle of proportionality and thereby can be recognized as an unjustifiable violation of the Article 106.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127770074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Viedo sistēmu operatoru vainojamības modelis","authors":"Jānis Kārkliņš, Ritvars Purmalis","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.11","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to provide a general overview of the conceptually supported view within European Union so far on the applicability of civil liability to operators and users of artificial intelligence-driven systems in the event that an artificial intelligence-driven system has caused negative consequences (damage) to another person’s legally protected interests. At the same time, particular attention will be paid to issues related to the standard of “due diligence” that must be carried out by intelligent system operators and the possibility to apply (and rebut) the presumption of causation, if the necessary preconditions can be established under the provisions stipulated by the currently proposed regulatory framework. It is undeniable that the use of such systems makes it possible to optimize the performance of a myriad of tasks and to monitor them more effectively as it would be possible, for example, with human supervision, but one thing is clear – there must be certainty about the way in which the allocation of the applicable civil liability takes place, that decision-making bodies of the European Union have committed to ensure, similar to what was done with the General Data Protection Regulation regarding the integrity and limits of processing of personal data within the borders of European Union.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128059961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Konvertējamās obligācijas un to civiltiesiskās apgrozības ierobežojumi","authors":"Pauls Zeņķis","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.09","url":null,"abstract":"A bond is a debt security, under which its issuer undertakes to repay to the bondholder the principal of the bond and the interest (the coupon) at a specified point in time, that is to be considered as the extinguishing of bonds. There are several types of bonds: bonds issued by the public sector, bonds issued by capital companies, publicly available bonds, private bonds, convertible bonds, subordinated bonds, exchangeable bonds, etc. A convertible bond is a bond that its holder is entitled to swap for the issuer’s shares within a specified term. Thus, a convertible bond is a debt security that can be converted into equities, in accordance with the conversion rules. After the conversion of convertible bonds, the holder of the bonds becomes a shareholder of the bond issuer.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121910613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Testatora gribas ierobežojumi","authors":"Kristīne Zīle","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.15","url":null,"abstract":"The testator’s freedom in expressing his/her will per se is indisputable, however, this right of the testator is not absolute. The law grants the right to those entitled to the preferential share to claim their preferential share in case the testator has left them nothing or has left less than they are entitled to. The article analyses some aspects of the separation of the preferential share. For example, inclusion of inheritance or legatee in the preferential share, specifically considering the cases where some portion of the inheritance is located outside of Latvia, as well as the applicability of obligation to add-in what has been previously received in cases where the preferential share is claimed.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129840040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Privātās autonomijas ierobežojumi apdrošināšanas līgumtiesībās Latvijā","authors":"Vadims Mantrovs","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.06","url":null,"abstract":"The present article explores the application of private autonomy underlying private law and its limitations in insurance contract law in Latvia. The article deals with overview of private autonomy in Latvian insurance contract law with a special focus on the principle of freedom of contracts as the main expression of private autonomy. At the beginning, the article analyses general application of private autonomy in insurance contract regulation. The article further discusses four elements of the prin- ciple of freedom of contracts, such as the choice for conclusion of contract, the choice of contractual party, the choice of the contents of contract, and the choice of the contract’s form from the point of their limitation in insurance contract regulation. The article does not limit discussion with general insurance contract law but also pays attention to special insurance types, such as motor insurance, marine insurance, and various insurance types of the instances in which compulsory insurance is envisaged in Latvia. Likewise, the discussion covers not only Latvian national legal acts but also considers European Union law in the field of insurance law. The article finishes with the conclusion summarising the discussion reflected in the article.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123144311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tiesību normu iztulkošanas metožu nozīme koruptīvo noziegumu sastāvu satura noskaidrošanā","authors":"Māris Leja","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.34","url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the question at what point in time a request for a bribe and an offer of a bribe is deemed to be accomplished, if it is made to the addressee by means of an electronic mail message with the relevant content or passed on to an intermediary for transmission to the opposite party, i. e., is it completed at the moment of sending the electronic mail message (respectively, at the moment when the relevant communication is made to the intermediary) or at the moment when the addressee has read the message (respectively, when the intermediary has passed the information on to the opposite party)? Using all the methods of interpretation, the author finds that, while it is possible to find arguments in support of both interpretations, the arguments in favour of a later moment of completion are more convincing.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129864492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Procesuālā disfunkcija Latvijas kriminālprocesā kā konstitucionālo paradigmu nobīde","authors":"Egons Rusanovs","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.02","url":null,"abstract":"The doctrine of the continental European criminal procedure has established that development of procedural settlement of criminal legal relations is affined with the state’s constitutional system and should be evaluated through the prism of changes in the nation’s political, social, and moral conditions. It is an integral part within the doctrinal and normative development of modern criminal procedural archetypes, as conceptual implementation of the principle of separation of powers occurred in parallel with normative establishment of procedural functions in criminal proceedings. The separation of these functions is the basis for the constitutionally appropriate adoption of regulatory amendments and the practical course of criminal proceedings, protecting the defendant’s guarantees of justice.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132232311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Noziedzīga nodarījuma objekta doktrinārā novērtējuma ietekme uz noziedzīgu nodarījumu kvalifikāciju","authors":"Toms Čevers","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.36","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.36","url":null,"abstract":"Applying comparative scientific research method, the article inquires into conclusions of Latvian criminal law legal doctrine regarding the role of the object of a criminal offence in the qualification of criminal offences. It concludes that the object has no independent significance for distinction of criminal offences. Nevertheless, the title of the chapter of the Special part of the Criminal Code, which reflects the group object, promotes the systemic interpretation of legal norms. Since the protected interest per se is determined by the criminalization of the deed in question, Section 1901, which criminalizes the smuggling of dangerous items, is applicable, although it does not threaten the national economy, yet it is included in Chapter XIX “Criminal Offences of an Economic Nature”.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134156315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}