Viktorija Katajeva
{"title":"Profesionālā dienesta līguma izbeigšana pirms termiņa, pusēm vienojoties: valsts imperatīvās militārās intereses versus cilvēka pamattiesības","authors":"Viktorija Katajeva","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is twofold: to analyse the specifics of the termination of professional service contract before the end of the term; and to find out whether such basis as the legislator’s political decision to limit the fundamental rights defined in Article 106 of the Constitution is justified, due to state’s imperative military interests. The author concludes that an unjustified refusal of the institution to agree on the termination of the professional service contract before the end of the term does not comply with the principle of proportionality and thereby can be recognized as an unjustifiable violation of the Article 106.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的有两个:分析专业服务合同期满前终止的具体情况;并找出立法者限制宪法第106条规定的基本权利的政治决定是否基于国家迫切的军事利益是合理的。笔者认为,在专业服务合同期满前,该机构不合理地拒绝同意终止专业服务合同,不符合比例原则,因此可以认定为不合理地违反了《合同法》第一百零六条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profesionālā dienesta līguma izbeigšana pirms termiņa, pusēm vienojoties: valsts imperatīvās militārās intereses versus cilvēka pamattiesības
The purpose of the article is twofold: to analyse the specifics of the termination of professional service contract before the end of the term; and to find out whether such basis as the legislator’s political decision to limit the fundamental rights defined in Article 106 of the Constitution is justified, due to state’s imperative military interests. The author concludes that an unjustified refusal of the institution to agree on the termination of the professional service contract before the end of the term does not comply with the principle of proportionality and thereby can be recognized as an unjustifiable violation of the Article 106.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信