{"title":"Profesionālā dienesta līguma izbeigšana pirms termiņa, pusēm vienojoties: valsts imperatīvās militārās intereses versus cilvēka pamattiesības","authors":"Viktorija Katajeva","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is twofold: to analyse the specifics of the termination of professional service contract before the end of the term; and to find out whether such basis as the legislator’s political decision to limit the fundamental rights defined in Article 106 of the Constitution is justified, due to state’s imperative military interests. The author concludes that an unjustified refusal of the institution to agree on the termination of the professional service contract before the end of the term does not comply with the principle of proportionality and thereby can be recognized as an unjustifiable violation of the Article 106.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Profesionālā dienesta līguma izbeigšana pirms termiņa, pusēm vienojoties: valsts imperatīvās militārās intereses versus cilvēka pamattiesības
The purpose of the article is twofold: to analyse the specifics of the termination of professional service contract before the end of the term; and to find out whether such basis as the legislator’s political decision to limit the fundamental rights defined in Article 106 of the Constitution is justified, due to state’s imperative military interests. The author concludes that an unjustified refusal of the institution to agree on the termination of the professional service contract before the end of the term does not comply with the principle of proportionality and thereby can be recognized as an unjustifiable violation of the Article 106.