Toms Čevers
{"title":"Noziedzīga nodarījuma objekta doktrinārā novērtējuma ietekme uz noziedzīgu nodarījumu kvalifikāciju","authors":"Toms Čevers","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applying comparative scientific research method, the article inquires into conclusions of Latvian criminal law legal doctrine regarding the role of the object of a criminal offence in the qualification of criminal offences. It concludes that the object has no independent significance for distinction of criminal offences. Nevertheless, the title of the chapter of the Special part of the Criminal Code, which reflects the group object, promotes the systemic interpretation of legal norms. Since the protected interest per se is determined by the criminalization of the deed in question, Section 1901, which criminalizes the smuggling of dangerous items, is applicable, although it does not threaten the national economy, yet it is included in Chapter XIX “Criminal Offences of an Economic Nature”.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用比较科学的研究方法,探讨拉脱维亚刑法法律学说关于刑事犯罪客体在刑事犯罪资格认定中的作用的结论。认为该客体对刑事犯罪的区分不具有独立意义。然而,刑法典特殊部分的章节标题反映了群体客体,促进了法律规范的系统解释。由于受保护的利益本身是由有关契约的刑事定罪决定的,因此,将走私危险物品定为刑事犯罪的第1901条是适用的,尽管它不威胁国民经济,但它被列入第十九章“经济性质的刑事犯罪”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Noziedzīga nodarījuma objekta doktrinārā novērtējuma ietekme uz noziedzīgu nodarījumu kvalifikāciju
Applying comparative scientific research method, the article inquires into conclusions of Latvian criminal law legal doctrine regarding the role of the object of a criminal offence in the qualification of criminal offences. It concludes that the object has no independent significance for distinction of criminal offences. Nevertheless, the title of the chapter of the Special part of the Criminal Code, which reflects the group object, promotes the systemic interpretation of legal norms. Since the protected interest per se is determined by the criminalization of the deed in question, Section 1901, which criminalizes the smuggling of dangerous items, is applicable, although it does not threaten the national economy, yet it is included in Chapter XIX “Criminal Offences of an Economic Nature”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信