“Saindētā koka augļu” doktrīnas izpratne pierādījumu pieļaujamības izvērtējumā Latvijas tiesu praksē

Linda Lielbriede
{"title":"“Saindētā koka augļu” doktrīnas izpratne pierādījumu pieļaujamības izvērtējumā Latvijas tiesu praksē","authors":"Linda Lielbriede","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine is associated with the common law system, developing a special concept to make evidence inadmissible in court if it has been derived from the evidence that has been illegally obtained. In other jurisdictions, the application of the aforementioned doctrine has not been perceived unambiguously. In Latvia, the legislator has refrained from recognizing this doctrine; the Supreme Court likewise so far has not confirmed the application of the said doctrine, although in practice the issue of admissibility of evidence is relevant in every criminal trial.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine is associated with the common law system, developing a special concept to make evidence inadmissible in court if it has been derived from the evidence that has been illegally obtained. In other jurisdictions, the application of the aforementioned doctrine has not been perceived unambiguously. In Latvia, the legislator has refrained from recognizing this doctrine; the Supreme Court likewise so far has not confirmed the application of the said doctrine, although in practice the issue of admissibility of evidence is relevant in every criminal trial.
“毒树之果”学说是与英美法系相联系的,它发展出一种特殊的概念,即如果证据来自非法获取的证据,则法庭不能采纳。在其他司法管辖区,上述原则的适用并不明确。在拉脱维亚,立法者没有承认这一原则;同样,最高法院到目前为止也没有确认上述原则的适用,尽管在实践中证据的可采性问题与每一项刑事审判都有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信