Parlamentārās kontroles nozīme pamattiesību aizsardzībā

Aleksandrs Kuzņecovs
{"title":"Parlamentārās kontroles nozīme pamattiesību aizsardzībā","authors":"Aleksandrs Kuzņecovs","doi":"10.22364/juzk.81.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parliament’s role in promoting of human rights cannot be overlooked either historically, or today. Parliaments were the first institutions, which started to promote human rights, especially at the era when judiciaries were appointed by the monarch and executives were fully controlled by royalty. Nowadays, human rights protection is predominantly entrusted to the judiciary, which by enjoying independence from executive power, holds the main safeguard position in promotion of human rights. However, the role of parliaments in protection of human rights should not be underestimated. First and foremost, parliamentarians are those in power who can be proactive in human rights protection not just within the legislative powers, but also in executing parliamentary control over the public administration. Courts are authorised to adjudicate individual cases only on the basis of action of individual, whilst parliaments can tackle systemic violations of human rights by means of parliamentary control, which can be addressed towards local authorities, as well as high-level officials of the executive power. Moreover, parliaments have extensive discretion in evaluating the actions of governmental officials, which can manifest itself as a removal of official from the position, executing parliamentary inquiry or even performing legislative parliamentary control.","PeriodicalId":141268,"journal":{"name":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tiesību ierobežojumu pieļaujamība un attaisnojamība demokrātiskā tiesiskā valstī","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parliament’s role in promoting of human rights cannot be overlooked either historically, or today. Parliaments were the first institutions, which started to promote human rights, especially at the era when judiciaries were appointed by the monarch and executives were fully controlled by royalty. Nowadays, human rights protection is predominantly entrusted to the judiciary, which by enjoying independence from executive power, holds the main safeguard position in promotion of human rights. However, the role of parliaments in protection of human rights should not be underestimated. First and foremost, parliamentarians are those in power who can be proactive in human rights protection not just within the legislative powers, but also in executing parliamentary control over the public administration. Courts are authorised to adjudicate individual cases only on the basis of action of individual, whilst parliaments can tackle systemic violations of human rights by means of parliamentary control, which can be addressed towards local authorities, as well as high-level officials of the executive power. Moreover, parliaments have extensive discretion in evaluating the actions of governmental officials, which can manifest itself as a removal of official from the position, executing parliamentary inquiry or even performing legislative parliamentary control.
无论是历史上还是今天,议会在促进人权方面的作用都不容忽视。议会是第一个开始促进人权的机构,特别是在司法机构由君主任命,行政部门完全由皇室控制的时代。当今世界,人权保护主要由司法机关承担,司法机关独立于行政权力,在促进人权方面处于主要保障地位。然而,不应低估议会在保护人权方面的作用。首先,议员是那些不仅在立法权力范围内,而且在执行议会对公共行政的控制方面能够积极主动地保护人权的当权者。法院有权仅根据个人的行动对个别案件作出裁决,而议会可以通过议会控制来处理系统性侵犯人权的行为,这种情况可向地方当局以及行政权力的高级官员提出。此外,议会在评估政府官员的行为方面拥有广泛的自由裁量权,这可以表现为将官员从职位上撤职,执行议会调查,甚至执行立法议会控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信