Assessment最新文献_第8页

Validation of the 10-Item Social Provision Scale (SPS-10): Evaluating Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Network Across 38 Countries. 10 项社会供应量表（SPS-10）的验证：评估 38 个国家的因子结构、可靠性、测量不变性和名义网络。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241283609

Philipp E Sischka, Isabelle Albert, Anna E Kornadt

{"title":"Validation of the 10-Item Social Provision Scale (SPS-10): Evaluating Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Network Across 38 Countries.","authors":"Philipp E Sischka, Isabelle Albert, Anna E Kornadt","doi":"10.1177/10731911241283609","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911241283609","url":null,"abstract":"The 24-item Social Provision Scale is among the most frequently used self-report scales to assess perceived social support. A shortened 10-item version (SPS-10) with promising psychometric properties has been proposed. However, so far only a few studies in specific cultural contexts investigated its psychometric properties. Thus, the aim of the current study was an extensive investigation of the psychometric properties of the SPS-10 among 38 countries (N = 88,857 respondents) using the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey data. Item response theory bifactor analysis revealed that the general factor accounts for the largest part of the covariance among the items in all countries (explained common variance ≥ .75) and that the mean/sum score of the SPS-10 can be used as a total score of perceived general social support. Reliability was high for all countries (ρunidimensional GRM ≥ .89). Measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning analysis of the unidimensional graded response model indicated negligible differential test functioning across countries. The association with the external criteria mainly supported its construct validity. The SPS-10 is a psychometrically sound measure of perceived social support for large-scale cross-cultural studies.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241283609"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142666996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Convergent Validity of Experimental Cognitive Tests in a Large Community Sample. 大型社区样本中实验认知测试的收敛性。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241283410

Andy C Dean, Jean-Baptiste Pochon, Robert M Bilder, Fred W Sabb, Eliza Congdon, Dara Ghahremani, Katherine H Karlsgodt, Theo G M van Erp, Rebecca F Schwarzlose, Tyrone D Cannon, Nelson B Freimer, Edythe D London

{"title":"Convergent Validity of Experimental Cognitive Tests in a Large Community Sample.","authors":"Andy C Dean, Jean-Baptiste Pochon, Robert M Bilder, Fred W Sabb, Eliza Congdon, Dara Ghahremani, Katherine H Karlsgodt, Theo G M van Erp, Rebecca F Schwarzlose, Tyrone D Cannon, Nelson B Freimer, Edythe D London","doi":"10.1177/10731911241283410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241283410","url":null,"abstract":"Experimental cognitive tests are designed to measure particular cognitive domains, although evidence supporting test validity is often limited. The Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics test battery administered 23 experimental and traditional neuropsychological tests to a large sample of community volunteers (n = 1,059) and patients with psychiatric diagnoses (n = 137), providing a unique opportunity to examine convergent validity with factor analysis. Traditional tests included subtests from the Wechsler and Delis-Kaplan batteries, while experimental tests included the Attention Networks Test, Balloon Analogue Risk Task, Delay Discounting Task, Remember-Know, Reversal Learning Task, Scene Recognition, Spatial and Verbal Capacity and Manipulation Tasks, Stop-Signal Task, and Task Switching. Several experimental cognitive measures were insufficiently related to other tests and were excluded from factor analyses. In the remaining 18 tests, exploratory factor analysis and subsequent multigroup confirmatory factor analysis supported a three-factor structure broadly corresponding to domains of verbal/working memory, inhibitory control, and memory. In sum, several experimental measures of inhibitory control had weak relationships with all other tests, while the convergent validity of most tests of working memory and memory was supported.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241283410"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Gritty Parenting: The Development and Validation of the Parental Grit Scale. 父母的勇气：父母勇气量表的开发与验证》。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241289242

Ziwen Teuber, Jesus Alfonso D Datu, Elouise Botes, Theresa Dicke, Gesine Jordan, Xiaoyu Lan, Dragoş Iliescu, Jiesi Guo, Samuel Greiff

{"title":"Gritty Parenting: The Development and Validation of the Parental Grit Scale.","authors":"Ziwen Teuber, Jesus Alfonso D Datu, Elouise Botes, Theresa Dicke, Gesine Jordan, Xiaoyu Lan, Dragoş Iliescu, Jiesi Guo, Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1177/10731911241289242","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241289242","url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we aimed to expand the domain specificity of grit by exploring it in the realm of parenting. Parental grit was defined as parents' inclination to demonstrate perseverance, sustained passion, and adaptability in pursuing long-term parenting goals. With longitudinal data from 1,373 U.S. parents, we developed and validated the Parental Grit Scale (PGS) in three phases: item development and revision, establishment of factor structure, and examination of criterion-related and incremental validity. The PGS exhibited a three-factor structure and (partial) scalar measurement invariance across genders, the status of the child's special needs, and measurement occasions. The PGS demonstrated moderate temporal stability. We found evidence of its validity in predicting parental emotional exhaustion, self-efficacy, autonomy support, and parents' perceptions of children's school well-being. Parental grit explained variance in these outcomes beyond domain-general grit and conscientiousness. The PGS has sound psychometric properties and is a valuable measure in the parenting domain.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241289242"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613858","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale in LGBTQIA+ Parents. LGBTQIA+ 家长多维养育评估量表的心理测量学评估。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241289501

Violeta J Rodriguez, Qimin Liu

{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale in LGBTQIA+ Parents.","authors":"Violeta J Rodriguez, Qimin Liu","doi":"10.1177/10731911241289501","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241289501","url":null,"abstract":"In LGBTQIA+ adults, 36% are parents, but there are a limited number of parenting scales that have undergone psychometric evaluation in LGBTQIA+ parents. This study assessed the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS) in LGBTQIA+ parents, addressing a gap in parenting scales considering both positive and negative aspects for this group. Our study includes two racially and ethnically diverse national samples of parents (n = 2,299, mean age = 37.05 years, 32.84% LGBTQIA+). We explored measurement invariance between LGBTQIA+ and non-LGBTQIA+ parents. The analysis revealed a modest fit for configural and metric invariance, indicating the MAPS structure and item loadings were consistent across groups, although scalar invariance was only partially supported. Subscales showed good internal consistency for both parent groups. Importantly, following false discovery rate corrections, interactions between LGBTQIA+ status and specific MAPS subscales (supportiveness, physical control) were significantly, but differentially, related to various child psychopathology dimensions, suggesting parenting impacts may differ for LGBTQIA+ families. These findings underscore the importance of including LGBTQIA+ perspectives in parenting research to develop tailored interventions that address their unique strengths and challenges. Acknowledging and supporting the diverse experiences of LGBTQIA+ parents can enhance targeted resources and interventions, contributing to better outcomes for all families.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241289501"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142493729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Development and Validation of Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) Algorithms to Assess ICD-11 Personality Trait Domain Qualifiers. 用于评估 ICD-11 人格特质领域限定词的维度临床人格量表 2 (IDCP-2) 算法的开发与验证》（Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) Algorithms to Assess ICD-11 Personality Trait Domain Qualifiers.

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-10 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241285102

Sérgio Eduardo Silva de Oliveira, Gisele Magarotto Machado, Giselle Pianowski, Marcela Mansur-Alves, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho

{"title":"Development and Validation of Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) Algorithms to Assess ICD-11 Personality Trait Domain Qualifiers.","authors":"Sérgio Eduardo Silva de Oliveira, Gisele Magarotto Machado, Giselle Pianowski, Marcela Mansur-Alves, Lucas de Francisco Carvalho","doi":"10.1177/10731911241285102","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241285102","url":null,"abstract":"With the advent of the new diagnostic model for personality disorders in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), researchers and practitioners in World Health Organization signatory countries are urged to implement it. This study aims to develop a brief, reliable, and valid scale for assessing maladaptive personality traits according to the ICD-11 model, using the item pool of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP-2). Quantitative and qualitative criteria for item selection were applied to a sample of 251 Brazilian adults. As a result, the 25 items (five items per factor) were selected, demonstrating promising evidence of validity based on the internal structure with a database of 1,659 Brazilian adults. In addition, we found good evidence of validity based on relationships with external variables, particularly those related to personality pathology, in a sample of 617 Brazilian adults. The implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241285102"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Assessing Jealousy: Factor Analyses, Measurement Invariance, Nomological Validity, and Longitudinal APIM Analyses of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. 评估嫉妒：多维嫉妒量表的因子分析、测量不变性、名义效度和纵向 APIM 分析。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241283927

Kay Brauer, René T Proyer

引用次数: 0

Psychometric Evaluation of Cognitive and Positive Valence Tasks Chosen for the NIMH Research Domain Criteria Project. 为 NIMH 研究领域标准项目选择的认知和积极价值任务的心理计量学评估。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-06 DOI: 10.1177/10731911241280770

John R Duffy, Emily T Sturm, Anastasia G Sares, Lauren Sarabia, Eve M Delao, Katherine M Becker, Andrea M Colmenares, Raana M Manavi, Donald C Rojas, Jason R Tregellas, Jared W Young, Michael L Thomas

{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of Cognitive and Positive Valence Tasks Chosen for the NIMH Research Domain Criteria Project.","authors":"John R Duffy, Emily T Sturm, Anastasia G Sares, Lauren Sarabia, Eve M Delao, Katherine M Becker, Andrea M Colmenares, Raana M Manavi, Donald C Rojas, Jason R Tregellas, Jared W Young, Michael L Thomas","doi":"10.1177/10731911241280770","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241280770","url":null,"abstract":"The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative seeks to utilize multidimensional patterns of socio-cognitive behavior to improve understanding of mental illness. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a subset of RDoC tasks. Specifically, we investigated two positive valence tasks and five cognitive tasks. Participants (N = 320) were recruited through an online research platform. We used generalizability theory to estimate reliability, and factor analysis to examine factor structure. Reliability was average to excellent with some notable exceptions. Factor analysis results raised concerns about whether the factor structure of task scores aligns with the proposed RDoC model. Effects of cognitive manipulations generally supported the construct representation of tasks. Results indicate that the majority of RDoC task scores examined have acceptable reliability or can be made reliable through modest increases in task length. Future research in diverse populations is needed to better understand the factor structure of RDoC cognitive and positive valence measures.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"10731911241280770"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142379996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Are We Measuring ADHD or Anxiety? Examining the Factor Structure and Discriminant Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale in an Adult Anxiety Disorder Population. 我们是在测量多动症还是焦虑症？在成人焦虑症人群中研究成人多动症自评量表的因子结构和判别效力。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI: 10.1177/10731911231225190

Arij Alarachi, Colleen Merrifield, Karen Rowa, Randi E McCabe

{"title":"Are We Measuring ADHD or Anxiety? Examining the Factor Structure and Discriminant Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale in an Adult Anxiety Disorder Population.","authors":"Arij Alarachi, Colleen Merrifield, Karen Rowa, Randi E McCabe","doi":"10.1177/10731911231225190","DOIUrl":"10.1177/10731911231225190","url":null,"abstract":"Adults with clinical anxiety have significant symptom overlap and above average rates of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite this, ADHD remains a vastly under-detected disorder among this population, indicating the need for a screener with well-understood symptom dimensions and good discriminant validity. The current study compared competing models of ADHD as well as discriminant properties of self-reported ADHD symptoms as measured by the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS-v1.1) in 618 adults with clinical anxiety. A three-factor correlated model of Inattention, Impulsivity, and Hyperactivity, with the movement of one item, talks excessively, to a factor of Impulsivity from Hyperactivity fit better than the one-factor, two-factor, and traditional three-factor models of ADHD. Discriminant properties of the screener were fair to good against measures of clinical anxiety and distress; however, some items within the Hyperactivity factor (e.g., difficulty relaxing; feeling driven by a motor) loaded more strongly onto factors of clinical anxiety than ADHD when measures were pooled together. These results suggest that clinicians making differential diagnoses between adult ADHD and anxiety or related disorders should look for evidence of ADHD beyond the overlapping symptoms, particularly for those within the Hyperactivity factor.","PeriodicalId":8577,"journal":{"name":"Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1508-1524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409565/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139575051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Development and Psychometric Validation of the Body Trust Scale. 身体信任量表的开发和心理测量验证。

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-04 DOI: 10.1177/10731911231225200

William Grunewald, Sydney N Waitz-Kudla, Cheri A Levinson, Tiffany A Brown, April R Smith

引用次数: 0

The Short Executive Function Scale. 执行功能简表

IF 3.5 2区心理学

Assessment Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-13 DOI: 10.1177/10731911231223122

Justin E Karr

引用次数: 0