Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth, Sami Ouanes, Kristian Somintac, Shaima Gulistan, Asieh Dehwari, Widaad Nuzhah Chut-Kai Khoodoruth, Mohammed Nasser Alamri, Majid Alabdulla, Yasser Saeed Khan
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and intentions among parents of children with mental and behavioral disorders.","authors":"Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth, Sami Ouanes, Kristian Somintac, Shaima Gulistan, Asieh Dehwari, Widaad Nuzhah Chut-Kai Khoodoruth, Mohammed Nasser Alamri, Majid Alabdulla, Yasser Saeed Khan","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2412385","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2412385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parent vaccine hesitancy (PVH) remains a significant public health concern, particularly emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigates PVH among parents of children with various psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and behavioral disturbances, extending previous research focused on autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We examined PVH in children aged 5-11 years with psychiatric and behavioral disorders excluding ASD. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based analysis was conducted in Qatar, involving 244 parents of neurodiverse children and 245 parents of neurotypical children as controls. The Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey assessed PVH. Results indicated a significantly higher prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among parents of children with psychiatric disorders (54.1%, 95% CI [47.8%, 60.4%], <i>n</i> = 132) compared to controls (11.7%, 95% CI [7.5%, 16.0%], <i>n</i> = 26), <i>p</i> < .001. The PACV total score was significantly higher in parents of children with a mental disorder. Higher education among parents and lower PACV scores significantly influenced the intent to vaccinate against COVID-19. Tailored interventions by child and adolescent mental healthcare professionals, such as harnessing artificial intelligence to fight disinformation, are crucial to addressing vaccine hesitancy, enhancing acceptance, and improving outcomes for children with psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2412385"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486274/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142478671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Response to \"A bibliometric and knowledge-map study on the treatment of hematological malignancies with CAR-T cells from 2012 to 2023: A correspondence\".","authors":"Huimin Li, Qing Huang, Yuan Zhang","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2386225","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2386225","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2386225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Comment on \"Bibliometric analysis reveals the research hotspots and trends of nasopharyngeal carcinoma immunotherapy\".","authors":"Heng Bai, Si-Yang Liu, Jie Tian, Yu Li","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2393485","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2393485","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2393485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brandon J Essink, Craig Shapiro, Marie Grace Dawn Isidro, Paul Bradley, Antoinette Pragalos, Mark Bloch, Joel Santiaguel, Melchor Victor Frias, Spiros Miyakis, Margarida Alves de Mesquita, Stefano Berrè, Charlotte Servais, Natasha Waugh, Claudia Hoffmann, Emna Baba, Oliver Schönborn-Kellenberger, Olaf-Oliver Wolz, Sven D Koch, Tapiwa Ganyani, Philippe Boutet, Philipp Mann, Stefan O Mueller, Roshan Ramanathan, Martin Robert Gaudinski, Nicolas Vanhoutte
{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of a modified mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate against COVID-19: Results from a phase 1, dose-escalation study.","authors":"Brandon J Essink, Craig Shapiro, Marie Grace Dawn Isidro, Paul Bradley, Antoinette Pragalos, Mark Bloch, Joel Santiaguel, Melchor Victor Frias, Spiros Miyakis, Margarida Alves de Mesquita, Stefano Berrè, Charlotte Servais, Natasha Waugh, Claudia Hoffmann, Emna Baba, Oliver Schönborn-Kellenberger, Olaf-Oliver Wolz, Sven D Koch, Tapiwa Ganyani, Philippe Boutet, Philipp Mann, Stefan O Mueller, Roshan Ramanathan, Martin Robert Gaudinski, Nicolas Vanhoutte","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2408863","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2408863","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, multi-center study (NCT05477186) assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (CV0501) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 spike protein. Participants aged ≥ 18 years previously vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine received CV0501 doses ranging from 12 to 200 μg. After assessment of safety and immunogenicity of the 12 μg dose in 30 adults, 30 adults ≤ 64 years were randomized to receive either a 3 or 6 μg dose. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days, unsolicited AEs for 28 days, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) until day (D) 181 post-vaccination. Serum neutralizing titers specific to SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, wild-type, Delta, and additional Omicron subvariants were assessed at D1, D15, D29, D91, and D181. Of 180 vaccinated participants (mean age: 49.3 years; 57.8% women), 70.6% had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most solicited local (98.1%) and systemic (96.7%) AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity; the most common were injection site pain (57.5%; 33.3-73.3% across groups) and myalgia (36.9%; 13.3-56.7%). Unsolicited AEs were reported by 14.4% (6.7-26.7%) of participants (mild-to-moderate severity in 88.5% of the participants). Three participants (1.7%) reported SAEs, 16.7% (6.7-30.0%) reported MAAEs, and 8.3% (0.0-13.3%) reported AESIs (15 COVID-19 cases), none related to vaccination. Geometric means of serum neutralizing titers increased from baseline to D15 and D29 (dose-dependent), and then decreased over time. The safety and immunogenicity results supported advancement to a phase 2 trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2408863"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492660/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142478693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shan-Shan Zhang, Wanna Shi, Juan Du, Wan-Xue Zhang, Mengjun Yuan, Yiguo Zhou, Lili Wang, Tianshuo Zhao, Qin-Yi Ma, Sihui Zhang, Han Yang, Xiyu Zhang, Mingting Wang, Ninghua Huang, Jing Zeng, Yaqiong Liu, Yuanshan Zhang, Fuqiang Cui, Qing-Bin Lu
{"title":"Impact of propensity to COVID-19 vaccination/vaccine on influenza vaccination from willingness to behavior among older adults in rural China.","authors":"Shan-Shan Zhang, Wanna Shi, Juan Du, Wan-Xue Zhang, Mengjun Yuan, Yiguo Zhou, Lili Wang, Tianshuo Zhao, Qin-Yi Ma, Sihui Zhang, Han Yang, Xiyu Zhang, Mingting Wang, Ninghua Huang, Jing Zeng, Yaqiong Liu, Yuanshan Zhang, Fuqiang Cui, Qing-Bin Lu","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2428017","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2428017","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore impact of the propensity to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine/vaccination on influenza vaccination from willingness to behavior after COVID-19 pandemic among older adults in rural China. A combined study involving a cross-sectional survey for the willingness of influenza vaccination, a health education momentary intervention and a community intervention program were conducted from September 11<sup>th</sup> to 16<sup>th</sup>, 2023 among rural older adults in China. Totally 3138 individuals were investigated in this study with 1923 (61.3%) willing to receive influenza vaccination. After the momentary intervention, 47.8% (582/1215) individuals changed to be willing to receive influenza vaccination. There were 1440 (78.8%) vaccinated. The influenza vaccination willingness rate was significantly higher in the participants willing to receive COVID-19 vaccine booster dose vaccination than the participants unwilling to (69.4% <i>vs</i>. 37.7%, adjusted OR [aOR] = 2.671, 95% CI 2.211-3.227, <i>p</i> < .001), as well as for the influenza vaccination willingness change rate (52.2% <i>vs</i>. 41.7%, aOR = 1.303, 95% CI 1.022-1.662, <i>p</i> < .05) and the influenza vaccination behavior rate (79.7% <i>vs</i>. 74.9%, aOR = 1.337, 95% CI 1.002-1.784, <i>p</i> < .05). The influenza vaccination behavior rate was significantly higher in those positive toward COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness or safety overall (80.0% <i>vs</i>. 74.9%, aOR = 1.394, 95% CI 1.065-1.823; 80.6% <i>vs</i>. 70.9%, aOR = 1.850, 95% CI 1.395-2.454; both <i>p</i> < .05). There was a positive impact of COVID-19 vaccine/vaccination on influenza vaccination from willingness to behavior among the older adults in rural China after COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that integrating health education of related pathogens and vaccines might promote influenza vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2428017"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572224/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Perceived barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination: Insights from focus groups with unvaccinated mid-adults in a U.S. medically underserved area.","authors":"Sandya Krishna, Andrea N Polonijo","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2422681","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2422681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) about HPV vaccination has been recommended for U.S. mid-adults aged 27-45 since 2019. To explore barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination in this population, we conducted 14 virtual focus groups with 86 unvaccinated mid-adults (34 men and 52 women) in California's medically underserved Inland Empire between September 2020 and January 2021. We systematically analyzed the focus group data using the rigorous and accelerated data reduction (RADaR) technique to identify key themes. Identified barriers included: lack of awareness, vaccine hesitancy, and perceived unaffordability (cited in 14 groups); lack of healthcare provider communication and insufficient time (13 groups); fear of moral judgment (12 groups); lack of motivation and information needs (10 groups); and lack of reliable transportation and foregone care during the COVID-19 pandemic (3 groups). Proposed facilitators included: tailored HPV vaccine information for mid-adults, cost mitigation, and improved vaccine accessibility (12 groups); healthcare provider-initiated conversations (6 groups); and vaccine reminders (4 groups). These findings highlight challenges to HPV vaccination among U.S. mid-adults eligible for SCDM and point to actionable strategies for improvement. Specifically, tailored educational interventions, decision-making tools for pharmacists, and integrating HPV vaccination into other healthcare encounters may enhance vaccination efforts in areas with limited primary care resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":"20 1","pages":"2422681"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572185/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142631104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}