Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics最新文献

{"title":"Comment on \"A bibliometric analysis of vaccination against atherosclerosis\".","authors":"Kun Xu, Ziqi Zhao, Xisheng Xu, Yuejun Zhou","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2377846","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2377846","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326448/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141903330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comment on \"Bibliometric analysis reveals the research hotspots and trends of nasopharyngeal carcinoma immunotherapy\".","authors":"Heng Bai, Si-Yang Liu, Jie Tian, Yu Li","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2393485","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2393485","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142113919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and intentions among parents of children with mental and behavioral disorders.","authors":"Mohamed Adil Shah Khoodoruth, Sami Ouanes, Kristian Somintac, Shaima Gulistan, Asieh Dehwari, Widaad Nuzhah Chut-Kai Khoodoruth, Mohammed Nasser Alamri, Majid Alabdulla, Yasser Saeed Khan","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2412385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2024.2412385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parent vaccine hesitancy (PVH) remains a significant public health concern, particularly emphasized during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study investigates PVH among parents of children with various psychiatric and neurodevelopmental conditions, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety disorders, and behavioral disturbances, extending previous research focused on autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We examined PVH in children aged 5-11 years with psychiatric and behavioral disorders excluding ASD. A cross-sectional questionnaire-based analysis was conducted in Qatar, involving 244 parents of neurodiverse children and 245 parents of neurotypical children as controls. The Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey assessed PVH. Results indicated a significantly higher prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among parents of children with psychiatric disorders (54.1%, 95% CI [47.8%, 60.4%], <i>n</i> = 132) compared to controls (11.7%, 95% CI [7.5%, 16.0%], <i>n</i> = 26), <i>p</i> < .001. The PACV total score was significantly higher in parents of children with a mental disorder. Higher education among parents and lower PACV scores significantly influenced the intent to vaccinate against COVID-19. Tailored interventions by child and adolescent mental healthcare professionals, such as harnessing artificial intelligence to fight disinformation, are crucial to addressing vaccine hesitancy, enhancing acceptance, and improving outcomes for children with psychiatric disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486274/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142478671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cost-based COVID-19 vaccination and willingness to pay: A post-pandemic review.","authors":"Li Ping Wong, Hai Yen Lee, Haridah Alias, Gregory Zimet, Tongyu Liu, Yulan Lin, Zhijian Hu","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2313860","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2313860","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective of this paper is to serve as a valuable resource for policymakers who are confronted with the evolving landscape of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), considering both free and cost-based vaccination approaches. The potential consequences of shifting from free to cost-based vaccination are explored, encompassing its impact on global vaccine equity and prioritization, economic well-being, healthcare systems and delivery, public health policies, and vaccine distribution strategies. Examining past studies on willingness to pay for the initial COVID-19 vaccine dose and booster shots provides insights into how individuals value COVID-19 vaccinations and underscores the significance of addressing issues related to affordability. If COVID-19 vaccinations incur expenses, using effective communication strategies that emphasize the importance of vaccination and personal health benefits can increase willingness to pay. Making COVID-19 vaccines accessible through public health programs or health insurance can help alleviate financial barriers and increase vaccination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10877984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139742444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comment on: \"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study\".","authors":"Menglin Chen, Hua Zhao, Houshu Tu, Jiaoli Zhou, Ling He","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2411124","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2411124","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495520/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142407089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Safety and immunogenicity of a modified mRNA-lipid nanoparticle vaccine candidate against COVID-19: Results from a phase 1, dose-escalation study.","authors":"Brandon J Essink, Craig Shapiro, Marie Grace Dawn Isidro, Paul Bradley, Antoinette Pragalos, Mark Bloch, Joel Santiaguel, Melchor Victor Frias, Spiros Miyakis, Margarida Alves de Mesquita, Stefano Berrè, Charlotte Servais, Natasha Waugh, Claudia Hoffmann, Emna Baba, Oliver Schönborn-Kellenberger, Olaf-Oliver Wolz, Sven D Koch, Tapiwa Ganyani, Philippe Boutet, Philipp Mann, Stefan O Mueller, Roshan Ramanathan, Martin Robert Gaudinski, Nicolas Vanhoutte","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2408863","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2408863","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, multi-center study (NCT05477186) assessed the safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (CV0501) encoding the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 spike protein. Participants aged ≥ 18 years previously vaccinated with ≥ 2 doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine received CV0501 doses ranging from 12 to 200 μg. After assessment of safety and immunogenicity of the 12 μg dose in 30 adults, 30 adults ≤ 64 years were randomized to receive either a 3 or 6 μg dose. Solicited adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7 days, unsolicited AEs for 28 days, and serious AEs (SAEs), medically attended AEs (MAAEs), and AEs of special interest (AESIs) until day (D) 181 post-vaccination. Serum neutralizing titers specific to SARS-CoV-2 BA.1, wild-type, Delta, and additional Omicron subvariants were assessed at D1, D15, D29, D91, and D181. Of 180 vaccinated participants (mean age: 49.3 years; 57.8% women), 70.6% had prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most solicited local (98.1%) and systemic (96.7%) AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity; the most common were injection site pain (57.5%; 33.3-73.3% across groups) and myalgia (36.9%; 13.3-56.7%). Unsolicited AEs were reported by 14.4% (6.7-26.7%) of participants (mild-to-moderate severity in 88.5% of the participants). Three participants (1.7%) reported SAEs, 16.7% (6.7-30.0%) reported MAAEs, and 8.3% (0.0-13.3%) reported AESIs (15 COVID-19 cases), none related to vaccination. Geometric means of serum neutralizing titers increased from baseline to D15 and D29 (dose-dependent), and then decreased over time. The safety and immunogenicity results supported advancement to a phase 2 trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492660/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142478693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Immunogenicity and immune persistence of Zagreb 2-1-1 regimen of rabies vaccine in Chinese healthy individuals: A randomized, parallel-controlled of homologous vaccine with different immune procedure study.","authors":"Li Li, Jingyi Xu, Jiao Zhang, Fang Wang, Jianlin Cai, Liqing Yang, Zhenggang Zhu, Yunhua Bai, Bin Jia, Jianxin Ma, Nianming Shi, Shuping Li","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2403177","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2403177","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was a randomized, parallel-controlled of homologous vaccines with different immune procedure research to evaluate the immunogenicity and immune persistence of Zagreb 2-1-1 regimen of rabies vaccine in Chinese healthy individuals. 240 subjects aged ≤ 20、21-50、≥51 y were randomly divided into 2 groups (1:1), Zagreb 2-1-1 regimen receivers as experimental group and Essen 5 regimen receivers as controlled group. Researchers collected venous blood of each subject before vaccine injection and on the day 7, 14, 42, 180, 365 after first dose. The immunogenicity and immune persistence was assessed by neutralizing antibody. The positive rate of neutralizing antibody in experimental group was 14.53% on the 7th day, and raised to 100% on the 14th day. It showed no significant difference between experimental and controlled group (P>0.05). Either in experimental or controlled group, GMC of neutralizing antibody was up to the peak on the 14th day, and it showed no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). On the 42nd day, the antibody positive rate remained 100% with both Zagreb 2-1-1 and Essen 5 regimens, and the GMC of antibodies also remained high level. Then, on the 180th and 365th day with both regimens, the GMC of antibodies dropped dramatically, although it remained above the protective level of 0.5 IU/ml, the positive rates dropped to 84.40% and 84.11% (on the 180th day), and 61.29% and 58.62% (on the 365th day). Rabies vaccine injected by Zagreb 2-1-1 regimen can produce neutralizing antibody fastly and perdurably.<b>Registration</b>: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01821911and NCT01827917.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448322/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142367138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Change in intention and hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccines in a cohort of adults in Quebec during the pandemic.","authors":"Maude Dionne, Louis Rochette, Denis Hamel, Ève Dube","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2309006","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2309006","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although COVID-19 vaccine uptake was high in Quebec for the primary series, vaccine acceptance decreased for the subsequent booster doses. This article presents the evolution of vaccine intention, self-reported vaccination behaviors, and vaccine hesitancy over 2 years. A series of cross-sectional surveys were conducted in Quebec between March 2020 and March 2023, with a representative sample of 3,330 adults recruited biweekly via a Web panel. Panelists could have answered multiple times over the course of the project. A cohort of respondents was created to assess how attitudes and behaviors about COVID-19 vaccines evolved. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Among the 1,914 individuals with no or low intention of getting vaccinated in Fall 2021 (Period 1), 1,476 (77%) reported having received at least two doses in the Winter 2023 (Period 2). Not believing in conspiracy theory (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.65-2.64), being worried about catching COVID-19 (OR = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.65-2.73) and not living in a rural area (ORs of other areas are 2.27, 95% CI: 1.58-3.28; 1.66, 95% CI: 1.23-2.26; 1.82 95% CI: 1.23-2.73) were the three main factors associated with being vaccinated at Period 2. Among the 11,117 individuals not hesitant at Period 1, 1,335 (12%) became hesitant at Period 2. The three main factors significantly associated with becoming vaccine hesitant were the adherence to conspiracy theories (OR = 2.28, 95% CI: 1.95-2.66), being a female (OR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.48-1.90) and being younger than 65 years old (the ORs for 18-34, 35-49, and 50-64 compared with 65 and over are 2.82, 95% CI: 2.32-3.44; 2.39, 95% CI: 2.00-2.86 and 1.82, 95% CI: 1.55-2.15 respectively). As the pandemic is over, monitoring the evolution of vaccine attitudes and uptake will be important.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10865925/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139724674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward herpes zoster (HZ) and HZ vaccination: Concept elicitation findings from a multi-country study in the Asia Pacific.","authors":"Jing Chen, Sumitra Shantakumar, Jennifer Si, Regina Gowindah, Raunak Parikh, Felix Chan, Macy Chan, Won Suk Choi, Erick Huang, Kuo-Chin Huang, Li-Min Huang, Hyungwoo Kim, Choon Kit Leong, Hoe-Nam Leong, Yubin Seo, Charles Williams, Andrew Ty Wong","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2317446","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2317446","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Herpes zoster (HZ) is a prevalent disease characterized by a painful rash. A multi‑country study was conducted to elicit public and physician knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward HZ disease and vaccination for the assessment of local factors influencing HZ vaccine perceptions in four Asian-Pacific countries/territories One-to-one qualitative interviews were conducted in 2022, among the public (people aged ≥ 50 years, adults with parents aged ≥ 50 years, zoster vaccine live-vaccinated individuals aged ≥ 50 years in Republic of Korea, and HZ patients; <i>n</i> = 78) and physicians (general practitioners and specialists; <i>n</i> = 24). Themes surrounding KAP toward HZ and HZ vaccination were summarized using a thematic analysis. A substantial knowledge gap related to HZ was observed among the public, including its causes, long-term impacts, and the at-risk population. There was a low perceived risk of HZ and low general awareness of HZ vaccine availability, although country/territory-specific differences existed. Fear of HZ-associated pain contributed toward vaccination intent among HZ patients and adults with parents aged ≥ 50 years. HZ-naïve adults who were encouraged to receive the vaccine by others were not motivated to do so due to optimism bias. Physicians were perceived to be a reliable source of information. However, physicians did not always proactively discuss HZ vaccination due to time constraints and a perceived need to prioritize other vaccinations including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines. Initiatives are needed to improve public awareness of HZ and its complications, in terms of overall impact on individuals and society, and highlight the important role of physicians in recommending vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10913700/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140023081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study.","authors":"Xiaoyu Li, Yanping Bai, Lijun Weng, Yunshan Bai, Wenjie Gong","doi":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2315663","DOIUrl":"10.1080/21645515.2024.2315663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United Nations reported that the mortality risk of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is five times higher in the elderly than the global average. Although the COVID-19 vaccine effectively prevents infections and reduce mortality among the elderly, vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly poses a significant threat. This study, utilizing the \"Confidence, Convenience and Complacency (3 Cs)\" vaccine hesitancy model, aimed to explore factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy among the Chinese elderly and assess national countermeasures and potential improvement approaches. Thirteen elderly with vaccine hesitancy and eleven vaccine-related staff participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis revealed three key determinants of vaccine hesitancy among the elderly: perceived low threat of COVID-19, lack of confidence in COVID-19 vaccine, and poor accessibility to vaccination. China has implemented strategies, including advocacy through diverse channels, joint multi-sectoral promotion vaccination, and enhancing ongoing vaccination services. Recommendations from the vaccine-related staff emphasize improving vaccine awareness among the elderly, and prioritizing the vaccination environment and process. The study underscores the importance of targeted vaccination promotion programs addressing hesitation reasons to improve vaccination rates. Furthermore, existing countermeasures can serve as a foundation for enhancing vaccination strategies, including improved publicity, administration, and management approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":49067,"journal":{"name":"Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.8,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10936594/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140029379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}