Cognition & Emotion最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Beliefs about emotion usefulness are nuanced: degree of personal reference and emotional valence predict affective distress. 对情绪有用性的信念是有细微差别的:个人参考程度和情绪价值可预测情绪困扰。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-16 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2391586
Josh Shulkin, Michael A Kisley, Andrew Lac
{"title":"Beliefs about emotion usefulness are nuanced: degree of personal reference and emotional valence predict affective distress.","authors":"Josh Shulkin, Michael A Kisley, Andrew Lac","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2391586","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2391586","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The beliefs people hold about emotions are implicated in a variety of outcomes including emotion regulation success and overall well-being. However, research on the dimensions of such beliefs is limited, typically addressing broad beliefs about all emotions and focusing only on their controllability. This study investigated emotion usefulness beliefs, specifically, and further parsed dimensions of personal reference (general vs. personal emotions) and valence (positive vs. negative). Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 343), applying a 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA, revealed that participants believed negative emotions in general to be more useful than their own negative emotions, with no such difference emerging for positive emotions. Multiple regression analyses indicated that personal beliefs about emotions better predicted affective distress than general beliefs. Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 531) replicated these findings and employed confirmatory factor analyses to psychometrically assess the distinctiveness of these emotion belief dimensions. Evaluating a two-factor model, four-factor model, and three-factor bifactor model, results showed that both the four-factor and bifactor models fit the data well, whereas the two-factor model did not. These findings suggest that beliefs about emotion in general and beliefs about one's own emotions may not be fundamentally distinct, but rather different dimensions of the same underlying emotion usefulness belief.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"740-756"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141989164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bouncing back from emotional ups and downs: insights in emotional recovery using survival analyses of burst ESM data. 从情绪起伏中反弹:利用突发 ESM 数据生存分析法了解情绪恢复情况。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2024.2423706
Marieke J Schreuder, Sigert Ariens, Ginette Lafit, Eva Ceulemans
{"title":"Bouncing back from emotional ups and downs: insights in emotional recovery using survival analyses of burst ESM data.","authors":"Marieke J Schreuder, Sigert Ariens, Ginette Lafit, Eva Ceulemans","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2423706","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699931.2024.2423706","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many experience sampling (ESM) studies suggested that high resilience is reflected by quickly recovering one's emotional baseline. However, former studies relied on coarse data and did not look into differential recovery from emotional ups and downs. This preregistered proof-of-concept study therefore used high-resolution data collected in 2022 to compute emotional recovery after high levels of positive versus negative emotions. Adults (<i>N</i> = 68) participated in a three-week ESM study with eight assessments per day, complemented by short-spaced burst assessments. Resilience was assessed at baseline (trait-level; TR) and daily (day-level; DR). Multilevel survival analyses showed that high DR predicted faster returns from negative emotions, but also delayed returns following positive emotions (exp(<i>β</i>) = 1.32, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Instead, TR did not relate to emotional recovery (exp(<i>β</i>) = 0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.067). These findings were generally robust across different sensitivity analyses. This illustrates how innovative ESM designs combined with time-to-event analyses may further our insight in emotional recovery and the timescale at which it unfolds.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"910-919"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142584374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do we see what we feel? A comparative study of spider size estimation among experts and people who are highly fearful of spiders. 我们看到我们的感觉了吗?专家和极度害怕蜘蛛的人对蜘蛛大小估计的比较研究。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-29 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2510388
Yahel Dror Ben-Baruch, Yoram Zvik, Noga Cohen
{"title":"Do we see what we feel? A comparative study of spider size estimation among experts and people who are highly fearful of spiders.","authors":"Yahel Dror Ben-Baruch, Yoram Zvik, Noga Cohen","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2510388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2510388","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The existence of fear-driven perceptual biases is well-established in the research literature and explained by survival mechanisms, whereas findings on perceptual biases among experts remain inconsistent. This study is the first to compare the impact of emotion and expertise on perception by examining spider size estimation among spider-fearful individuals (<i>N</i> = 58), spider experts (<i>N</i> = 59) and a control group (<i>N</i> = 52). Participants estimated the size of spiders, butterflies and wasps depicted in pictures. In line with prior findings, highly fearful individuals overestimated the size of spiders but not the size of butterflies, while control group members rated the two types of animals similarly. Spider experts demonstrated relatively accurate size estimation across all stimuli. These results highlight the dominant role of emotion over expertise in perceptual biases, with spider-fearful individuals exaggerating spider size and experts maintaining accuracy. This study bridges the gap between emotion-driven and expertise-driven perceptual biases, offering insights into the differential effects of fear and specialised knowledge on visual perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144183080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Can participants authoritatively report on the emotional valence of their mind wandering? 参与者能否权威地报告他们走神时的情绪效价?
IF 2.2 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2507693
Matthew S Welhaf, Jonathan B Banks
{"title":"Can participants authoritatively report on the emotional valence of their mind wandering?","authors":"Matthew S Welhaf, Jonathan B Banks","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2507693","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2507693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals might vary in their ability to accurately monitor their ongoing conscious experiences of mind wandering. Such findings have serious implications for understanding the accuracy of participants' ability to report their ongoing thoughts. We extend these previous findings to ask if individuals vary in the ability to accurately monitor and report on the emotional valence of their task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs). Participants completed a sustained attention task with periodic thought probes asking about emotional valence of their TUTs. Following these thought reports, they provided a confidence judgement. Participants were less confident in their TUTs compared to on-task reports. Among emotionally valenced TUTs, participants were more confident when reporting negatively valenced TUTs but less (and similarly) confident when reporting neutral and positive TUTs. Confidence moderated the within-subject relationship between positive TUTs and no-go accuracy. There was no moderating effect of confidence on more covert measures of mind wandering including mean response time or response time variability. We discuss the implications of these findings by suggesting that while people might vary in their ability to monitor and report on different aspects of their mind wandering, it is also possible that performance-induced confounds are introduced that could muddy the reliability of these reports.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354149/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175437","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring multiple automatic product appraisals simultaneously: introduction and examination of the implicit attribute classification task. 同时测量多个自动产品评价:隐式属性分类任务的介绍与检验。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2508396
Daria Altenburg, Adriaan Spruyt
{"title":"Measuring multiple automatic product appraisals simultaneously: introduction and examination of the implicit attribute classification task.","authors":"Daria Altenburg, Adriaan Spruyt","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2508396","DOIUrl":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2508396","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Past research has demonstrated that both carefully formed, contemplated attitudes, but also spontaneously elicited, automatic evaluations play a crucial role in motivating behaviour. However, the accurate measurement of automatic appraisals can be challenging because existing measures can assess automatic appraisals on single attribute dimensions only (e.g. \"pleasant\"/\"unpleasant\"). This limitation is particularly critical in consumer decision making because (a) products are never unidimensional, and (b) past research has demonstrated that the complex weighting of various product dimensions (e.g. price, taste, healthiness) often plays a crucial role in consumer decision making. Here, we present the Implicit Attribute Classification Task (\"IMPACT\"), a new measure of automatic product appraisals that, crucially, was designed specifically to reflect the multidimensionality of stimuli by assessing automatic appraisals of multiple facets simultaneously. Across six experiments, we systematically investigate the paradigm in a series of IMPACTS that examine different facets of automaticity. Our findings make a substantial contribution to research on implicit (consumer) cognition by introducing the IMPACT as a sophisticated new tool that, for the first time, facilitates the assessment of automatic appraisals of multiple facets at once.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-29"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combining virtual reality-based positive mental imagery and dual tasking increases children's willingness to exposure. 将基于虚拟现实的积极心理意象和双重任务相结合,增加了儿童的暴露意愿。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-28 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2508400
H J Bragt-de Jong, E Dejonckheere, T Smeets, P Lodder, A Karreman
{"title":"Combining virtual reality-based positive mental imagery and dual tasking increases children's willingness to exposure.","authors":"H J Bragt-de Jong, E Dejonckheere, T Smeets, P Lodder, A Karreman","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2508400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2508400","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This experiment aimed to test whether FutureMe, a VR-tool combining positive mental imagery and dual tasking, is efficacious in increasing willingness to exposure, and decreasing distress, emotionality, and vividness, of children's autobiographical fears, compared to an active VR control condition. Additionally, the moderating role of emotion regulation difficulties was investigated. Children (<i>N</i> = 557; 53.9% boys), with a mean age of 10.14 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.90), were randomly allocated to either the FutureMe (<i>n</i> = 281) or control (<i>n</i> = 276) condition. Willingness to exposure, distress, emotionality, and vividness were measured at pre- and posttest on a VAS from 0 (not at all) to 100 (very much). Parents (<i>n</i> = 437) filled out the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Parent Report, assessing their child's emotion regulation difficulties. Willingness to exposure increased only in the FutureMe condition. Distress and emotionality decreased in both conditions. Vividness decreased only in the control condition. Emotion regulation difficulties moderated the pre-post change of distress and emotionality only within the control condition. This study shows that the FutureMe could improve children's willingness to exposure, which in clinical practice could lead to less drop-out in anxiety therapy for children. More research is needed on the separate effects of dual tasking and positive mental imagery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144175470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distraction over reappraisal strategies in interpersonal emotion regulation: associations with emotional difficulties. 人际情绪调节中重评价策略的干扰:与情绪困难的关联。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2507692
Belén López-Pérez, Kyongboon Kwon, Yuhui Chen
{"title":"Distraction over reappraisal strategies in interpersonal emotion regulation: associations with emotional difficulties.","authors":"Belén López-Pérez, Kyongboon Kwon, Yuhui Chen","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2507692","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2507692","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distraction (diversion from the emotional experience) has been suggested as generally less effective than reappraisal (engagement with the emotional experience through cognitive reframing) to change one's own and others' emotions. Hence, we examined if a predominant use of distraction over reappraisal in interpersonal emotion regulation can be problematic. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 274), we used a difference score to assess individuals' dominant use of distraction over reappraisal. This tendency was linked to more difficulties in identifying and describing feelings and greater experience of personal distress. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 121), based on latent class analysis, we identified three classes: Class 1 (23%; who consistently used reappraisal to change others' anger, sadness, or stress/anxiety), Class 2 (48%; who consistently used affective engagement), and Class 3 (19%; who consistently used distraction). Importantly, Class 3 (users of distraction) scored higher in difficulties in emotion identification of themselves and others and experiential avoidance compared to the classes who mainly used affective engagement and reappraisal. The obtained results suggest that the consistent use of diversion over engagement strategies to change others' emotions might be associated with more emotional difficulties in the regulator.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144151800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biased judgments of emotion are resistant to changes in the prevalence of anger. 对情绪的偏见判断对愤怒盛行的变化是有抵抗力的。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-26 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2506667
Delaney McDonagh, Timothy Sweeny
{"title":"Biased judgments of emotion are resistant to changes in the prevalence of anger.","authors":"Delaney McDonagh, Timothy Sweeny","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2506667","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2506667","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Emotional expressions are often nuanced and are thus evaluated with an unavoidable degree of uncertainty. We recently showed that perceivers are biased to interpret others' expressions negatively, especially when they are seen in crowds. We argued that the flexible nature of this bias is protective, and that it emerges because perceivers learn about the threatening nature of crowds over prolonged windows of time. Here we evaluated whether this negativity bias can recalibrate as perceivers learn about changes in the prevalence of threat in the short-term. Perceivers viewed single faces or crowds of four faces and indicated whether their expressions were happy or angry. We manipulated the prevalence of anger across three experiments, displaying angry faces on 75% or 25% of trials. We replicated our previous findings, again showing that observers were biased to evaluate others as angry, especially in crowds. Surprisingly, the strength of anger bias was not affected by the prevalence of anger, neither when perceivers learned about this implicitly nor when they were explicitly informed about it in advance. This suggests that anger bias is flexible, but more to contextual cues, like the number faces being evaluated, and less to statistical cues, like the prevalence of anger.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144151784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
When and why people do NOT regulate their emotions: examining the reasons and contexts. 人们何时以及为什么不调节自己的情绪:检查原因和背景。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-23 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2504560
Jocelyn Lai, Nathaniel S Eckland, Renee J Thompson
{"title":"When and why people do NOT regulate their emotions: examining the reasons and contexts.","authors":"Jocelyn Lai, Nathaniel S Eckland, Renee J Thompson","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2504560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2504560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The motives, strategies, and effectiveness of emotion regulation have been the focus of emotion regulation literature to date. However, naturalistic research finds that individuals choose not to regulate their emotions as often as they choose to regulate them. We examined how often people did not regulate their emotions, the reasons why people chose not to regulate, and contextual factors related to not regulating. Adults (<i>N</i> = 179; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 35.34, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 12.26) completed ecological momentary assessments five times daily for 14 days, reporting on their largest emotional shift over the last three hours, contextual factors regarding this shift, and emotion regulation. When participants indicated not regulating, they reported their reasons for not regulating. People reported not regulating about half the time; the most frequent reasons were that emotions were appropriate or helpful (39%) or not intense enough (31%). The likelihood of not regulating was associated with greater situational pleasantness, lower situational importance, more positive affect, and less negative affect. People were less likely to regulate when alone. This research focused on an overlooked but significant part of the emotion regulation process, choosing not to engage in emotion regulation. Findings clarify the reasons people do not regulate as well as contextual features related to their decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144133206","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Facial mimicry depends on the emotion we recognize in others' faces. 面部模仿依赖于我们从他人脸上识别出的情绪。
IF 2.6 3区 心理学
Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-05-20 DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2025.2497933
Anna K Nakamura, Akihiro Tanaka
{"title":"Facial mimicry depends on the emotion we recognize in others' faces.","authors":"Anna K Nakamura, Akihiro Tanaka","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2497933","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2497933","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Facial mimicry is known to play an important role in emotional communication. While major models of facial mimicry assume a relationship between facial mimicry and emotion recognition, the empirical evidence for such a relationship is mixed. In this study, the facial movements of the same participants were compared when they recognised the same uncertain faces as \"happiness\" or \"anger.\" When faces expressed anger in the upper half (upper anger) and happiness in the lower half (lower happiness), participants responded that it was \"happiness\" in some trials and \"anger\" in others. The electromyography data showed that participants frowned more in trials in which they recognised anger in the upper anger and lower happiness faces than in trials in which they recognised happiness in the same faces (Experiment 1). By presenting the upper and lower half of expressions individually, we confirmed that upper anger and lower happiness were both salient in the expression intensity and that both the upper and lower half of the faces individually induced emotionally congruent facial movements (Experiment 2). Despite limitations, this study supported the relationship between facial mimicry and emotional recognition. These findings aid in further understanding social interaction at an unconscious and physical level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144112190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信