Group Processes & Intergroup Relations最新文献_第8页

Heroes or traitors? Perception of whistleblowers depends on the self-relevance of the group being reported 英雄还是叛徒?对举报人的看法取决于被举报群体的自我相关性

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221123923

M. Pacilli, I. Giovannelli, Federica Spaccatini, S. Pagliaro, Marco Brambilla, M. Barreto, S. Sacchi

引用次数: 5

Trash talk about the other gender: Content of, reactions to, and willingness to confront stereotypical comments about men and women 关于异性的垃圾言论:关于男性和女性的陈规定型评论的内容、反应和面对的意愿

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-10-07 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221125182

Elizabeth L. Haines, Rebecca Schachtman, P. Glick, Juliana Earvolino

{"title":"Trash talk about the other gender: Content of, reactions to, and willingness to confront stereotypical comments about men and women","authors":"Elizabeth L. Haines, Rebecca Schachtman, P. Glick, Juliana Earvolino","doi":"10.1177/13684302221125182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221125182","url":null,"abstract":"We examined the content of and reactions to stereotypical comments about men and women. In Study 1, daily comments participants recalled hearing people make about “what men/women are like” were generally negative and targeted the other gender. Men rejected negative comments about both genders, whereas women rejected negative comments about women more than comments about men. In Study 2, college participants could confront an online interaction partner who made an other-gender sexist comment. Women confronted a comment targeting women and had more negative reactions to sexism directed at a woman than at a man; men had equivalent, negative reactions to sexism that did not depend on target gender. Study 3 extended and replicated Study 2 by including both other-gender and same gender sexism. Results showed that (a) women were more attuned to men’s sexism toward women compared to all other types and (b) men responded negatively to sexism about either gender, but were more likely to confront sexism directed at women than sexism directed at men. We suggest that women’s tendency to confront sexism when it targets women but not men may reinforce stereotypes that undermine gender equality.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"109 1","pages":"1660 - 1680"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79594927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Perceptions of intolerant norms both facilitate and inhibit collective action among sexual minorities. 对不宽容规范的认知既促进又抑制了性少数群体的集体行动。

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-20 DOI: 10.1177/13684302211024335

Léïla Eisner, Richard Settersten, Felicity Turner-Zwinkels, Tabea Hässler

{"title":"Perceptions of intolerant norms both facilitate and inhibit collective action among sexual minorities.","authors":"Léïla Eisner, Richard Settersten, Felicity Turner-Zwinkels, Tabea Hässler","doi":"10.1177/13684302211024335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211024335","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of three studies that examine how the perceived opinions of others are related to sexual minorities' support for social change toward greater equality. Results of two cross-sectional studies (Study 1: N = 1,220; Study 2: N = 904) reveal that perceived intolerance (i.e., perceived intolerant societal norms) is indirectly related to intentions to engage in collective action in both negative and positive ways: the negative effect was mediated by lower perceptions of perceived efficacy; positive effects were mediated by greater anger (about the legal situation and public opinion) and greater perceived need for a movement. Study 3 (N = 408) replicates this conflicting effect with a delayed outcome measure by showing that perceived intolerant norms were indirectly, both negatively and positively, associated with actual collective action engagement. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our expanded social identity model of collective action.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"25 7","pages":"1797-1818"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/58/10.1177_13684302211024335.PMC9493407.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33485181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Party over pandemic: Polarized trust in political leaders and experts explains public support for COVID-19 policies 大流行党:对政治领导人和专家的两极分化信任解释了公众对COVID-19政策的支持

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221118534

Jennifer C. Cole, Alexandra Flores, G. Jiga‐Boy, O. Klein, D. Sherman, Leaf Van Boven

{"title":"Party over pandemic: Polarized trust in political leaders and experts explains public support for COVID-19 policies","authors":"Jennifer C. Cole, Alexandra Flores, G. Jiga‐Boy, O. Klein, D. Sherman, Leaf Van Boven","doi":"10.1177/13684302221118534","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221118534","url":null,"abstract":"Two experiments examined the polarization of public support for COVID-19 policies due to people’s (lack of) trust in political leaders and nonpartisan experts. In diverse samples in the United States (Experiment 1; N = 1,802) and the United Kingdom (Experiment 2; N = 1,825), participants evaluated COVID-19 policies that were framed as proposed by ingroup political leaders, outgroup political leaders, nonpartisan experts, or, in the United States, a bipartisan group of political leaders. At the time of the study in April 2020, COVID-19 was an unfamiliar and shared threat. Therefore, there were theoretical reasons suggesting that attitudes toward COVID-19 policy may not have been politically polarized. Yet, our results demonstrated that even relatively early in the pandemic people supported policies from ingroup political leaders more than the same policies from outgroup leaders, extending prior research on how people align their policy stances to political elites from their own parties. People also trusted experts and ingroup political leaders more than they did outgroup political leaders. Partly because of this polarized trust, policies from experts and bipartisan groups were more widely supported than policies from ingroup political leaders. These results illustrate the potentially detrimental role political leaders may play and the potential for effective leadership by bipartisan groups and nonpartisan experts in shaping public policy attitudes during crises.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"338 1","pages":"1611 - 1640"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76996751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

A rising tide lifts all boats: Group performance and intragroup status 一股水涨船高:团队绩效和团队内部地位

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221122667

Francis J. Flynn, Chunchen Xu

引用次数: 0

Endorsing negative intergroup attitudes to justify failure to confront prejudice 支持消极的群体间态度，为未能直面偏见辩护

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-09-20 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221120488

Hanna Szekeres, Eran Halperin, Anna Kende, Tamar Saguy

引用次数: 0

Groups amplify the perceived threat and justification for using force against Black people protesting for racial equality—especially among social conservatives 团体放大了对抗议种族平等的黑人使用武力的威胁和理由，尤其是在社会保守派中

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221119982

Erin Cooley, J. Brown-Iannuzzi, B. Payne, J. Steele, William Cipolli

引用次数: 0

When seeing stigma creates paternalism: Learning about disadvantage leads to perceptions of incompetence. 当看到耻辱产生家长式作风时:了解劣势会导致对无能的看法。

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-29 DOI: 10.1177/13684302211009590

Stephanie L Reeves, Crystal Tse, Christine Logel, Steven J Spencer

引用次数: 5

I will help you survive but not thrive: Helping decisions in situations that empower women 我会帮助你生存，但不是茁壮成长:在赋予女性权力的情况下帮助做出决定

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221108437

Orly Bareket, Danit Ein-Gar, Tehila Kogut

引用次数: 2

The irony of (romantic) harmony: Heterosexual romantic relationships can drive women’s justification of the gender hierarchy （浪漫）和谐的讽刺：异性浪漫关系可以推动女性对性别等级制度的辩护

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2022-07-19 DOI: 10.1177/13684302221100403

Danit Sobol-Sarag, Noa Schori-Eyal, Saulo Fernández, Tamar Saguy

{"title":"The irony of (romantic) harmony: Heterosexual romantic relationships can drive women’s justification of the gender hierarchy","authors":"Danit Sobol-Sarag, Noa Schori-Eyal, Saulo Fernández, Tamar Saguy","doi":"10.1177/13684302221100403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302221100403","url":null,"abstract":"Even though gender inequality is evident across life domains, women often justify the gender hierarchy. We examined whether the very closeness that heterosexual women share with their male romantic partners predicts their justification of gender inequality. We drew on intergroup-related research, showing that positive perceptions that minority groups develop within harmonious intergroup interactions, generalize to affect their views of group-based inequality. We expected that to the extent that women experience their romantic relationships positively, they will be more accepting of gender inequality within their homes, and these perceptions will generalize to predict justification of macro-level gender inequality. Five correlational and two experimental studies supported this prediction. The more women rated (or were primed with) their relationship as positive, the more they justified the gender social system. This was mediated by women’s perception of their housework division as fair, and was less pronounced among feminists. Implications regarding social change are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"26 1","pages":"1099 - 1118"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45076016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3