Group Processes & Intergroup Relations最新文献_第3页

The structure and correlates of vegan stereotypes 素食者刻板印象的结构和相关因素

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241230001

Maya Aloni, Christopher J. Hopwood, Madeline R. Lenhausen, Daniel L. Rosenfeld, Keira O. Mohan

引用次数: 0

Corrigendum to “Contributions of group identification and emotional synchrony in understanding collective gatherings: A meta-analysis of 13 studies” 对 "群体认同和情感同步对理解集体聚会的贡献：对 13 项研究的元分析"

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241248025

引用次数: 0

Psychological mechanisms underlying ingroup favouritism in cooperation: Revisiting the reputation management and expectation hypotheses 合作中群体偏爱的心理机制：重新审视声誉管理和期望假说

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241239860

Hirotaka Imada, Nobuhiro Mifune, Hiroshi Shimizu

{"title":"Psychological mechanisms underlying ingroup favouritism in cooperation: Revisiting the reputation management and expectation hypotheses","authors":"Hirotaka Imada, Nobuhiro Mifune, Hiroshi Shimizu","doi":"10.1177/13684302241239860","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241239860","url":null,"abstract":"According to the theory of bounded generalized reciprocity (BGR), intergroup contexts afford individuals the assumption that indirect reciprocity is bounded by group membership, and this shapes ingroup favouritism in cooperation. The assumption of bounded indirect reciprocity is hypothesized to result in ingroup favouritisms via two pathways: it leads people to behave in ways that earn and maintain a positive reputation in the eyes of ingroup, but not outgroup, members (the reputation management hypothesis), and it leads individuals to expect other ingroup members to be more cooperative than outgroup members (the expectation hypothesis). In other words, BGR offers two parallel psychological explanations for why people display ingroup favouritism. While the latter hypothesis has gained much experimental support, evidence for the former is rather scarce. Here, we report a direct test of both the reputation management hypothesis and the expectation hypothesis using two economic games. Overall, we found support for the expectation hypothesis, but not for the reputation management hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140570431","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why Americans increasingly claim to own guns for self-protection: A modern culture of social-psychological threat defense 为什么越来越多的美国人声称拥有枪支是为了自我保护？社会心理威胁防御的现代文化

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241240684

Wolfgang Stroebe, N. Pontus Leander

{"title":"Why Americans increasingly claim to own guns for self-protection: A modern culture of social-psychological threat defense","authors":"Wolfgang Stroebe, N. Pontus Leander","doi":"10.1177/13684302241240684","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241240684","url":null,"abstract":"This article addresses two questions: (a) why do Americans believe that they need guns to defend themselves and their families and (b) why has the number of Americans who share this belief increased dramatically in recent decades? To address the first question, we describe a model of defensive gun ownership that assumes that Americans’ perceived need of a gun for self-defense is not only determined by their perceived lifetime risk of being assaulted (PLRA), but also by some diffuse belief in a dangerous world (BDW). In attempting to identify the dangerous world feared by high BDW gun owners, we review evidence that gun ownership is often associated with racial prejudice and concerns about groups that are stereotypically associated with safety threats (e.g., Black Americans, illegal immigrants). We identified three environmental changes that might exacerbate social threat perceptions: the proliferation of intergroup threat narratives such as the great replacement theory (that White Americans will be replaced by non-White minorities), the COVID-19 pandemic, and a change in the way the American gun industry advertises their products (praising the quality of their guns to emphasize the usefulness of guns for self-defense).","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140570114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Harnessing the many facets of White identity to reduce feelings of threat and improve intergroup relations 利用白人身份的多面性来减少威胁感和改善群体间关系

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241240688

Kimberly Rios

引用次数: 0

Group-oriented motivations underlying conspiracy theories 阴谋论背后以群体为导向的动机

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241240696

Jan-Willem van Prooijen

引用次数: 0

Perceptions of women and men in mixed-race heterosexual relationships 混血异性关系中的男女观念

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-03-16 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241233505

Maria Iankilevitch, Alison L. Chasteen

引用次数: 0

Social dominance and authoritarianism have mostly countervailing associations with attitudes about COVID-19 and its management 社会主导地位和专制主义与人们对 COVID-19 及其管理的态度有很大程度的相反关系

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-03-14 DOI: 10.1177/13684302231208382

Elena Zubielevitch, Nicole Satherley, Chris G. Sibley, Danny Osborne

{"title":"Social dominance and authoritarianism have mostly countervailing associations with attitudes about COVID-19 and its management","authors":"Elena Zubielevitch, Nicole Satherley, Chris G. Sibley, Danny Osborne","doi":"10.1177/13684302231208382","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231208382","url":null,"abstract":"Although social dominance orientation (SDO) and right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) often predict similar outcomes, their respective motivations to reinforce inequality and mitigate threat are ostensibly incompatible with attempts to manage a pandemic. We test the potential countervailing associations SDO and RWA have with COVID-19 attitudes in a nationwide random sample of New Zealand adults ( N = 31,025). As hypothesized, SDO and RWA had countervailing associations with most COVID-19 attitudes, including believing the health risks were exaggerated; trust in and satisfaction with the government; compliance with various health directives; and getting information from mainstream media and the government. Nevertheless, SDO and RWA both correlated positively with getting information from social media, believing COVID-19 was laboratory-created, worrying about catching the virus, confidence in recovering from COVID-19, and ruminating about the pandemic. Collectively, these results suggest that people who prefer hierarchies may oppose COVID-19 containment efforts, whereas authoritarians may support such measures.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140146354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Testing the boundaries of the model of pro-group intent: Does group interaction influence reaction to poor performers? 测试亲群体意图模型的界限：群体互动会影响对表现不佳者的反应吗？

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241226924

J. Lukas Thürmer

{"title":"Testing the boundaries of the model of pro-group intent: Does group interaction influence reaction to poor performers?","authors":"J. Lukas Thürmer","doi":"10.1177/13684302241226924","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241226924","url":null,"abstract":"Objective:When task groups depend on all members’ contributions, one poor performer can threaten the entire group’s goal attainment. The model of pro-group intent (M-PGI) stipulates that group responses to such poor performers are primarily determined by the group’s assessment of that person’s willingness to help the group ( attributed pro-group intent). Despite supportive evidence, past research has neglected whether model predictions hold under conditions more representative of group life. The current study thus tests the M-PGI in (a) personal interaction, (b) settings beyond the work context, and (c) repeated decisions.Method:The current paper reports two experiments using repeated decision scenarios across a range of group situations (i.e., within-participant designs). The main experiment, moreover, manipulated whether two group members discussed their response to a described poor performer (interacting dyads) or decided individually (nominal dyads; between-participant factor).Results:Results provide consistent evidence for the M-PGI across contexts. Process analyses provide some evidence that model effects were stronger in interacting (vs. nominal) dyads.Conclusions:Interacting groups focus on poor performers’ intent when determining their responses. I discuss the implications of the M-PGI for group dynamics theory and research, as well as a range of applied fields.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"2017 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139952496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Active rejection or passive indifference? Mixed-methods evidence on national (dis)identification 主动拒绝还是被动漠视？关于国家（不）认同的混合方法证据

IF 4.4 2区心理学

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations Pub Date : 2024-02-19 DOI: 10.1177/13684302241229981

Vukašin Gligorić, Sandra Obradović

{"title":"Active rejection or passive indifference? Mixed-methods evidence on national (dis)identification","authors":"Vukašin Gligorić, Sandra Obradović","doi":"10.1177/13684302241229981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302241229981","url":null,"abstract":"Much of the research on national identity investigates its negative aspects through the form of nationalism. However, what happens at the opposite end of the spectrum, when someone does not glorify the national ingroup but actively rejects it? Across two studies conducted in Serbia ( Ns = 349 and 554), we investigated national identification and disidentification, their antecedents, and consequences. We found no evidence to distinguish between (low) national identification and disidentification. Regarding antecedents of national identification, we found that self-stereotypes (positive and lack of negative) were the most important contributors, followed by right-wing social ideology. Regarding consequences, low national identifiers endorsed wider identities (e.g., European, world citizen) and had higher intentions to migrate. Most strikingly, low identifiers blatantly dehumanized ingroup members, even more so than high identifiers dehumanized (high-status) outgroups. In analyzing qualitative data, we contextualized the quantitative findings by showing that low identification is mainly articulated as a mismatch between self and ingroup prototype, consequently leading to dehumanization. We conclude that low national identification can have detrimental effects, but that more research in the non-Western context is necessary to properly understand this phenomenon.","PeriodicalId":48099,"journal":{"name":"Group Processes & Intergroup Relations","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139952507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0