EuroChoices最新文献

{"title":"Advancing Agricultural Economics in Europe\u0000 Faire progresser l’économie agricole en Europe\u0000 Förderung der Agrarökonomie in Europa","authors":"John Davis","doi":"10.1111/1746-692x.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.70004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038579","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ukraine's Accession to the EU: Implications for the European Agricultural Sector\u0000 Adhésion de l'Ukraine à l'Union européenne : implications pour le secteur agricole européen\u0000 Der Beitritt der Ukraine zur EU: Auswirkungen auf den europäischen Agrarsektor","authors":"Elsa Régnier, Pierre-Marie Aubert","doi":"10.1111/1746-692x.70001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692x.70001","url":null,"abstract":"<p>L'éventuelle adhésion de l'Ukraine à l'Union européenne (UE) suscite l'appréhension des agriculteurs européens, qui craignent la concurrence de la production ukrainienne. L'agriculture ukrainienne est très compétitive en raison de la taille de son territoire, de ses terres fertiles et de ses faibles coûts de production. Ses principales exportations vers l'Europe sont des produits bruts à faible valeur ajoutée, principalement des céréales et des oléagineux utilisés pour l'alimentation animale. Si l'adhésion de l'Ukraine représente un défi pour les producteurs de grandes cultures (et, dans une moindre mesure, de volaille), les secteurs et industries correspondants de l'UE, elle ne représente pas une rupture avec la situation actuelle. Elle renforce plutôt les tendances en cours depuis le milieu des années 2010, à savoir l'augmentation des échanges commerciaux, notamment de produits agroalimentaires, suite à la signature de l'accord d'association UE-Ukraine en 2014. Par ailleurs, l'avenir des relations entre les deux régions et ses implications pour leurs secteurs agricoles respectifs ne sont pas encore déterminées. Elles seront façonnées par un ensemble de réglementations – et donc de choix politiques – en cours d'élaboration: le traité d'adhésion, la politique agricole commune et les réformes du cadre financier pluriannuel (CFP). Elles dépendront également de l’issue de la guerre et de ses conséquences sur le secteur agricole ukrainien, ainsi que de l’orientation choisie pour ce secteur dans le cadre du processus de reconstruction du pays.</p><p>Der mögliche Beitritt der Ukraine zur Europäischen Union (EU) sorgt in der europäischen Landwirtschaft für Besorgnis, da die Konkurrenz durch ukrainische Produkte befürchtet wird. Die ukrainische Landwirtschaft ist aufgrund ihrer Größe, ihrer fruchtbaren Böden und ihrer niedrigen Produktionskosten sehr wettbewerbsfähig. Die wichtigsten Exportgüter nach Europa sind Rohprodukte mit geringer Wertschöpfung, vor allem Getreide und Ölsaaten, die als Futtermittel verwendet werden. Der Beitritt der Ukraine stellt zwar eine Herausforderung für die Ackerbauproduzenten (und in geringerem Maße auch für die Geflügelproduzenten) sowie für bestimmte Sektoren und Branchen in der EU dar, bedeutet jedoch keine Abkehr von der aktuellen Situation. Vielmehr wird der Trend, der seit Mitter der seit Mitte der 2010er Jahre beobachtet wird, nämlich eine Zunahme des Handels, insbesondere mit Agrar- und Lebensmittelprodukten, verstärkt. Dieser Trend begann nach der Unterzeichnung des Assoziierungsabkommens zwischen der EU und der Ukraine im Jahr 2014. Darüber hinaus ist die Zukunft der Beziehungen zwischen den beiden Regionen und ihre Auswirkungen auf die jeweiligen Agrarsektoren noch nicht definiert. Sie werden durch eine Reihe von Verordnungen – und damit politischen Entscheidungen – geprägt sein, die derzeit ausgearbeitet werden: dem Beitrittsvertrag, den Reformen der GAP und des mehrjährigen Finanzrahmens (MFR). Sie werden au","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Finnish Farmers’ Adoption of Feed Additives for GHG Mitigation in Dairy Farming: Barriers and Perspectives\u0000 Adoption par les agriculteurs finlandais d'additifs alimentaires pour la réduction des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans l'élevage laitier : obstacles et perspectives\u0000 Futtermittelzusätze zur Minderung von Treibhausgasen in der finnischen Milchviehhaltung: Barrieren und Perspektiven","authors":"Amer Ait Sidhoum,&nbsp;Timo Sipiläinen,&nbsp;Virpi Kling,&nbsp;Jarkko K. Niemi","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12472","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study offers valuable insights into farmers’ perspectives on the use of feed additives (3-NOP) in reducing methane emissions, and highlights associated obstacles that may prevent the accelerated uptake of GHG mitigation measures. Our data originate from a survey of 239 Finnish dairy farmers. While most farmers acknowledge the importance of climate issues, only a small percentage consider the reduction of the environmental impact of milk production to be the responsibility of the producer. Still, the farmers would prefer to decide for themselves how to reduce emissions, which demonstrates that resistance toward external directives might exist. In addition, there is a discrepancy between economically viable and environmentally responsible management, and this makes farmers more preoccupied with profitability. Furthermore, most farmers consider the feed additives to be safe. However, their efficiency in emission reduction remains unclear to many which contributes to hesitation in adoption. Thus, improved communication and education towards sustainable practices is needed. Strengthening dialogue among researchers, advisors, policymakers and farmers can help clarify the environmental purpose of feed additives and address uncertainties about their effectiveness and safety. Targeted educational efforts should focus on practical, science-based methods for methane reduction and build confidence through transparent information and real-life examples.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12472","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perceptions of the Costs and Benefits of Farm Digitalisation in Europe\u0000 Perception des coûts et des avantages de la numérisation des exploitations agricoles en Europe\u0000 Kosten- und Nutzenwahrnehmung der landwirtschaftlichen Digitalisierung in Europa","authors":"Constantine Iliopoulos,&nbsp;Irini Theodorakopoulou,&nbsp;Thomas Giotis,&nbsp;Gianluca Brunori","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12471","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farm digitalisation is revolutionising European agriculture, offering enhanced productivity, resource efficiency and sustainability. Technologies like sensors, robotics and data-driven tools enable precise decision-making thereby reducing time and resource use. This article draws on insights from 18 focus groups in European living labs, engaging farmers, policymakers and advisors to explore the trade-offs of digital adoption.</p><p>Key benefits include time-saving tools that streamline operations, promote sustainability and support innovative business models. Digital platforms improve traceability, reduce chemical inputs and enhance food safety. Farmers also value how technology attracts younger generations and fosters inclusivity. Examples from France, Germany, Hungary and Italy illustrate region-specific applications, such as real-time data use and soil-scanning technologies.</p><p>However, significant challenges accompany digitalisation. Farmers cite high costs, a steep learning curve and infrastructure gaps like limited internet connectivity. Trust issues persist among farmers, governments and technology providers, while concerns over data ownership and governance hinder adoption. Small farms face disproportionate burdens due to financial constraints and skill shortages.</p><p>This study underscores the need for equitable support systems, transparent governance and tailored solutions to bridge gaps. By addressing these challenges, Europe can ensure farm digitalisation fosters sustainability and benefits all stakeholders, aligning with broader goals like the European Green Deal.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"54-62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12471","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038363","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Implications of the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism for Fertiliser and Food Markets\u0000 Conséquences du mécanisme d'ajustement carbone aux frontières de l'Union européenne pour les marchés des engrais et des produits alimentaires\u0000 Auswirkungen des EU- CO2-Grenzausgleichssystem auf die Düngemittel- und Lebensmittelmärkte","authors":"Simone Pieralli,&nbsp;Ignacio Pérez-Domínguez,&nbsp;Christian Elleby,&nbsp;Merritt Cluff","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12469","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12469","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coherence in policy approaches across countries is crucial for achieving common GHG emission reduction goals at lower costs. Agro-economic models like Aglink-Cosimo, including global fertiliser markets, are useful for analyzing the anticipated effects of GHG reduction policies on food commodity markets. These policies can significantly affect domestic industry competitiveness, either positively or negatively. Such assessment tools can enhance evidence-based policy discussions and formation. We include in the baseline a EU ETS carbon price on fertiliser production in the EU as of 2026, without free allowances at 100 USD/tonne of CO2-eq emitted. Carbon pricing is assumed to be applied by the EU, Canada and the USA to fertiliser production from 2026 onwards.</p><p>The results of the analysis presented in this article indicate that a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) significantly impacts fertiliser trade. A unilateral CBAM tariff affects EU fertiliser trade more than a common CBAM tariff adopted by a coalition of countries. These effects depend heavily on the volume of bilateral trade within club countries. Fertiliser markets influence commodity production and prices modestly due to the price inelasticity of fertiliser demand by farmers and the buffering role of trade in response to price shocks. In terms of GHG emissions, a climate club scenario results in lower total world emissions compared to a unilateral CBAM scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"23-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12469","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What Impact Does Agricultural Research Have on the Common Agricultural Policy?\u0000 Quel est l'impact de la recherche agricole sur la Politique agricole commune ?\u0000 Welchen Einfluss hat die Agrarforschung auf die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik?","authors":"Hervé Guyomard","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12470","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12470","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the agricultural research agenda are evolving at the same time. Although the past offers several examples of how research has influenced the CAP in terms of both objectives (progressive inclusion of environmental issues) and instruments (decoupling of income support measures, inefficiency of the ‘greening’ measure of the 2014–2020 CAP), assessing the impacts of agricultural research on the CAP is difficult for many reasons. Such an assessment requires a clear picture of agricultural research programmes, themes and results. It also calls for a robust analytical framework linking research programmes to CAP objectives and instruments in a context where both evolve simultaneously, are influenced by many other determinants, and vary over time depending on the political orientation of governments. Furthermore, European agriculture is influenced by many public policies other than the CAP, at both European Union and Member State level. Research and innovation efforts must ultimately be assessed according to their impacts not on the CAP but on agriculture, food and rural development in a context where assessment criteria must cover all sustainability dimensions, including resilience aspects. We conclude by emphasizing the need for both policy-makers and researchers to recognise explicitly that not all policy objectives are mutually compatible.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"72-78"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12470","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Economic Decline and Ecological Impact: What Future for European Fur Farming?\u0000 Déclin économique et impact écologique : quel avenir pour l’élevage d'animaux à fourrure en Europe ?\u0000 Wirtschaftlicher Niedergang und ökologische Auswirkungen: Was bringt die Zukunft für die europäische Pelztierzucht?","authors":"Martina Bozzola,&nbsp;Farah Hamdan","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12468","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12468","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The economic, ecological and animal welfare impacts of fur farming in the European Union have been debated for decades, culminating in proposals for an EU-wide ban on keeping animals solely for fur production. The Covid-19 pandemic further intensified these discussions, particularly within individual Member States.</p><p>This study analyses the economic trends, environmental consequences and disease risks associated with fur farming, providing insights to inform political and societal debate. Our findings indicate that, even before the pandemic, fur exports and consumer demand were in steady decline. This trend has been driven by shifting consumer preferences, major fashion brands phasing out fur, and growing concerns over animal welfare and sustainability. Additionally, the industry has been linked to biodiversity threats, zoonotic disease transmission, and negative environmental impacts, including a high carbon footprint.</p><p>While concerns remain over the relocation of fur farming to regions with weaker regulations, the industry requires a strategic transition. Supporting fur farmers in shifting to alternative activities, for example, through training, targeted subsidies, compensation and other policy incentives, can help repurpose land and employment towards viable and sustainable alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12468","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145037919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trade Winds of Change: Cumulative Effects of Bilateral Trade Agreements on the EU Agri-food Sector\u0000 Vent du changement dans le commerce international : effets cumulatifs des accords commerciaux bilatéraux sur le secteur agroalimentaire de l'Union européenne\u0000 Frischer Wind im Handel: Kumulative Auswirkungen bilateraler Handelsabkommen auf den EU-Agrar- und Ernährungssektor","authors":"Emanuele Ferrari,&nbsp;Christian Elleby,&nbsp;Beyhan De Jong,&nbsp;Robert M'barek,&nbsp;Ignacio Pérez Dominguez","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12467","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12467","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As one of the world's largest players in global trade, the EU pursues an open, sustainable and assertive trade strategy. The recent conclusions and ongoing negotiations of 10 European Union Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with Australia, Chile, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Mercosur bloc (comprising Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay), Mexico, New Zealand, the Philippines and Thailand are expected to diversify the EU's agri-food trade and enhance the resilience of its food supply chain. This resilience hinges on diversifying import sources and market outlets, which can be achieved through a robust trade policy that ensures access to a sufficient supply of affordable food for citizens. A two-step modelling approach was employed to assess ex-ante the cumulative economic impact of these FTAs on food commodity trade, production, consumption and prices in 2032.</p><p>The analysis reveals that both EU imports and exports increase in value in the simulated scenarios, with notable sectoral variations. On the one hand, exports of dairy products and pig meat exhibit significant growth. On the other hand, potential vulnerabilities of the EU beef, poultry meat, sugar and rice sectors are identified.</p><p>The study also examines the impact of the United Kingdom's trade agenda on the EU agri-food sector, quantifying the impact of the recent agreements between the UK, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the UK's future accession to the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement on the EU agri-food sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"11-22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12467","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reducing Food Loss: Post-harvest Strategies at the Small Scale\u0000 Réduire les pertes alimentaires : stratégies après récolte à petite échelle\u0000 Reduzierung von Lebensmittelverlusten: Kleinformatige Nachernte-Strategien","authors":"Zsófia Benedek,&nbsp;Katalin Kujáni,&nbsp;Judith Molnár","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12466","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines post-harvest technologies and practices tailored to small-scale operations, highlighting their potential to reduce food loss. A comprehensive approach to conceptualising post-harvest technologies is proposed across various stages of the value chain. By categorising solutions into three clusters – traditional practices, technology-driven approaches, and collaborative, community-centred strategies – the article provides practical examples. The specific characteristics of short food supply chains are considered throughout, recognising both the opportunities and challenges these systems present for small-scale producers. While many post-harvest technologies are designed for larger market actors, smaller producers often rely on alternative strategies, drawing on direct relationships with consumers to achieve greater flexibility and sustainability. Balancing cost-efficiency with sustainability requires prioritising traditional and community-driven practices, despite the time and collaboration these approaches may demand to succeed. However, these efforts can yield additional benefits, fostering knowledge-sharing, strengthening community ties, and ultimately contributing to more resilient and efficient food systems. Policy recommendations are also presented including tailored training programmes, regulatory adaptations, and the promotion of digital platforms to improve market access and reduce administrative burdens. Overall, the article demonstrates how targeted post-harvest strategies can help small-scale producers reduce food loss, contributing to broader sustainability, economic resilience, and food security goals across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 2","pages":"31-37"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12466","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145038501","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"50 Years of the EAAE. From Farm to Food Systems, 1975–2025\u0000 50 ans de l'AEEA. De la ferme aux systèmes alimentaires, 1975–2025\u0000 50 Jahre EAAE. Vom Bauernhof zum Ernährungssystem, 1975–2025","authors":"Jack Peerlings,&nbsp;Krjjn J. Poppe,&nbsp;Yves Segers","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12465","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines the development of the European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE) over the past fifty years and its impact on the field of agricultural economics. Established in 1975 to foster international collaboration – particularly within Europe – the EAAE has played a key role in promoting knowledge exchange among agricultural economists. Over time, the organisation has expanded its scope through congresses, seminars and scientific publications, including the <i>European Review of Agricultural Economics</i> (<i>ERAE</i>), <i>EuroChoices</i> and <i>Q Open</i>.</p><p>An analysis of congress and seminar themes reveals a shift in research focus from traditional agricultural economics to broader issues such as consumer behaviour, food systems, sustainability and climate change. While globalisation and food safety became dominant topics in the 1990s, the 21st century has seen increasing focus on consumer issues, digital innovations and food system transformations. The EAAE has not only responded to policy developments and scientific innovations but has also actively shaped policy debates and knowledge dissemination.</p><p>Beyond academic output, the EAAE has invested in supporting early-career researchers through PhD workshops and mentoring programmes. At the same time, in-person congresses and seminars remain central to the scientific community, despite the rise of digital knowledge-sharing platforms. The findings of this study underscore the continued relevance of the EAAE as a platform for scientific exchange and policy-oriented discussions within agricultural economics.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":"24 1","pages":"3-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12465","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143824681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}