What Triggers Change in Antimicrobial Use? Qu'est-ce qui déclenche un changement dans l'utilisation des antimicrobiens ? Was löst die Veränderungen beim Einsatz antimikrobieller Mittel aus?

IF 2.4 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Gareth Enticott, Hedvig Gröndal, Anne Hémonic, Kieran O'Mahony, Christine Roguet, Natalie Rousset, Orla Shortall, Lee-Ann Sutherland
{"title":"What Triggers Change in Antimicrobial Use?\n Qu'est-ce qui déclenche un changement dans l'utilisation des antimicrobiens ?\n Was löst die Veränderungen beim Einsatz antimikrobieller Mittel aus?","authors":"Gareth Enticott,&nbsp;Hedvig Gröndal,&nbsp;Anne Hémonic,&nbsp;Kieran O'Mahony,&nbsp;Christine Roguet,&nbsp;Natalie Rousset,&nbsp;Orla Shortall,&nbsp;Lee-Ann Sutherland","doi":"10.1111/1746-692X.12449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article considers how different ‘triggers' contribute to changes in the use of antimicrobials. Drawing on the Triggering Change model, the article suggests that the use of antimicrobials is path dependent: economically, socially and culturally invested in maintaining a steady trajectory, with incremental changes. Triggering events – such as farm succession, financial crisis, or disease outbreak – are required to break these dependencies and stimulate transitions to new farming trajectories. The article investigates which triggering events are significant in the context of responsible antimicrobial usage, in three European countries, spanning the beef, dairy, poultry and pig sectors. Results demonstrated that major reductions in antimicrobial use are often part of larger transition processes. Triggers led to major changes on farm which included reduction in antimicrobial use amongst other changes. When antimicrobial change occurred in isolation, it was typically in response to legislation, and progressed incrementally over time. To achieve major changes in antimicrobial use thus requires policies which work with trigger events such as supporting training of successors, and enabling farmers who have experienced major disease outbreaks to ‘build back better’. Working to shape what farmers understand as ‘good farming’ through education, regulations and benchmarking, are also important options.</p>","PeriodicalId":44823,"journal":{"name":"EuroChoices","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1746-692X.12449","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EuroChoices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1746-692X.12449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article considers how different ‘triggers' contribute to changes in the use of antimicrobials. Drawing on the Triggering Change model, the article suggests that the use of antimicrobials is path dependent: economically, socially and culturally invested in maintaining a steady trajectory, with incremental changes. Triggering events – such as farm succession, financial crisis, or disease outbreak – are required to break these dependencies and stimulate transitions to new farming trajectories. The article investigates which triggering events are significant in the context of responsible antimicrobial usage, in three European countries, spanning the beef, dairy, poultry and pig sectors. Results demonstrated that major reductions in antimicrobial use are often part of larger transition processes. Triggers led to major changes on farm which included reduction in antimicrobial use amongst other changes. When antimicrobial change occurred in isolation, it was typically in response to legislation, and progressed incrementally over time. To achieve major changes in antimicrobial use thus requires policies which work with trigger events such as supporting training of successors, and enabling farmers who have experienced major disease outbreaks to ‘build back better’. Working to shape what farmers understand as ‘good farming’ through education, regulations and benchmarking, are also important options.

Abstract Image

是什么引发了抗菌剂使用的变化? 抗菌素的使用发生变化的原因是什么? 是什么引发了抗菌药物使用的变化?
本文探讨了不同的 "触发因素 "如何促成抗菌药物使用的变化。文章借鉴 "触发变化 "模型,认为抗菌药物的使用具有路径依赖性:经济、社会和文化投资于保持稳定的轨迹和渐进的变化。需要有触发事件(如农场继承、金融危机或疾病爆发)来打破这些依赖性,刺激向新的耕作轨迹过渡。文章调查了在三个欧洲国家的牛肉、奶制品、家禽和养猪业中,哪些触发事件对负责任地使用抗菌剂具有重要意义。结果表明,抗菌剂使用量的大幅减少往往是更大转型过程的一部分。触发因素导致农场发生重大变化,其中包括减少抗菌剂的使用以及其他变化。当抗菌剂单独发生变化时,通常是为了响应立法,并随着时间的推移逐步推进。因此,要实现抗菌剂使用方面的重大变革,需要制定与触发事件相关的政策,如支持对继任者的培训,并使经历过重大疾病爆发的农民能够 "重建得更好"。通过教育、法规和基准,努力塑造农民对 "良好耕作 "的理解,也是重要的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EuroChoices
EuroChoices AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: EuroChoices is a full colour, peer reviewed, outreach journal of topical European agri-food and rural resource issues, published three times a year in April, August and December. Its main aim is to bring current research and policy deliberations on agri-food and rural resource issues to a wide readership, both technical & non-technical. The need for this is clear - there are great changes afoot in the European and global agri-food industries and rural areas, which are of enormous impact and concern to society. The issues which underlie present deliberations in the policy and private sectors are complex and, until now, normally expressed in impenetrable technical language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信