Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi最新文献

{"title":"ASAS PROPORSIONALITAS DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI SCRAP ANTARA PT. PERTAMINA REFINERY UNIT IV DENGAN VENDOR","authors":"Sandytias Dwi Putera, Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43018","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe article aims to know and analyze the basic application of proportionality in the formation  phase and the implementation stage of scrap purchase agreements between PT. Pertamina RU IV Cilacap and the vendors. This research belongs to the type of empirical law research that is descriptive by using a qualitative approach. The data used is primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques using interviews and literature studies. Technical analysis of data used by authors is a qualitative analysis with interactive analysis models. The results showed that the principle of proportionality has been applied to the establishment and implementation of scrap purchase agreements between PT. Pertamina RU IV Cilacap with the vendors. At the stage of the formation consisting of the negotiation stage, and the drafting phase of the agreement has applied the principle of proportionality by using 4 principles namely the principle of equality of rights, principles of freedom, proportional distribution principle, and the win-win solution principle. The principle of proportionality has also been applied to the implementation of scrap purchase agreements using the principle of equality of rights, principles of freedom, proportional distribution principle so that PT. Pertamina RU IV Cilacap as the seller and vendor as The buyer has applied the principle of proportionality to all phases of the agreement which starts from the negotiation stage until the implementation of the agreement in achieving a fair exchange of rights and obligations for the parties.Keywords : The principle of Proportionality; Scrap Purchase Agreement; Phase of Agreement Establishment; Phase of Implementation of the AgreementAbstrakArtikel bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis penerapan asas proporsionalitas dalam tahap pembentukan dan tahap pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli scrap antara PT. Pertamina RU IV Cilacap dengan vendor. Penelitian ini termasuk ke dalam jenis penelitian hukum empiris yang bersifat deskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Data yang digunakan merupakan data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Teknis analisis data yang digunakan penulis merupakan analisis kualitatif dengan model analisis interaktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas proporsionalitas telah diterapkan pada tahap pembentukan dan pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli scrap antara  PT. Pertamina RU IV Cilacap dengan vendor. Pada tahap pembentukan yang terdiri dari tahap  negosiasi, dan tahap penyusunan perjanjian telah menerapkan asas proporsionalitas dengan menggunakan 4 prinsip yaitu prinsip kesetaraan hak, prinsip kebebasan, prinsip distribusi proporsional, dan prinsip win-win solution. Asas proporsionalitas juga telah diterapkan pada tahap pelaksanaan perjanjian jual beli scrap dengan menggunakan prinsip kesetaraan hak, prinsip kebebasan, prinsip distribusi proporsional sehingga PT. Pertamina  RU IV Cilacap selaku ","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116607131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ASAS KEKUATAN MENGIKAT DALAM KONTRAK WARALABAYANG MENGALAMI PERUBAHAN KAITANNYA DENGAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP FRANCHISEE BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 42 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG WARALABA","authors":"Rilo Fisyahril Ramadhan, Yudho Taruno Muryanto","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43017","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aimed to find out the form of legal protection for franchisee in franchise contract that is amended based on Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 about Franchise. This study was a normative law research that is prescriptive in nature using statute and conceptual approaches. This study employed primary, secondary, and tertiary law materials. The methods of collecting data used were library study and the law material collected was then analyzed using deductive method. This research finally found that the form of law protection for franchisee in franchise agreement as mentioned in Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 about Franchise has not given consequence about the change of franchise contract and has not given law protection yet to franchisee because of the clauses about the termination of contract usually subjected to the franchisor’s assessment. However, if one party makes another suffering from loss or does not perform the agreement in which it is the franchisee is thee weak or harmed party, the lost/harmed party can take legal attempt for getting compensation. It was consistent with the provision of Articles 1238 – 1243 of KUH Perdata (Civil Code).   Keywords: Legal Protection; Franchise agreement or contract; contract amendmentAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap franchisee dalam  kontrak waralaba yang mengalami perubahan berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 tahun  2007 tentang Waralaba. Penulisan hukum ini merupakan penulisan hukum normatif yang bersifat  preskriptif, bahan hukum yang telah terkumpul kemudian dianalisis dengan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 42 tahun 2007 tentang waralaba belum memberikan konsekuensi tentang perubahan kontrak waralaba, sehingga ketentuan ini belum memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada franchisee dalam perubahan kontrak waralaba, karena klausula tentang pemutusan perjanjian tunduk pada penilaian franchisor. Apabila salah satu pihak merugikan pihak lain atau wanprestasi yang mana franchisee lah pihak yang lemah dan dirugikan, maka pihak yang dirugikan dapat menuntut ganti rugi. Hal ini sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 1238 sampai dengan Pasal 1243 KUHPerdata.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Perjanjian Waralaba; Perubahan Kontrak","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124611814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PRODUK INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS KOPI ARABIKA JAVA SINDORO-SUMBING","authors":"Mahasiswa Fakultas, Hukum Universitas, Sebelas Maret, M. Yusuf, Hernawan Hadi","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43007","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aims to examine the legal issues and to find out the the law enforcement of  Geographical Indication dispute settlement. The method for this research is empirical law research (sociology/non-doctrinal). The descriptive research category and object of this research in Farmers Group of Bina Sejahtera and Association of Geographical Indication Protector of  Kopi Arabika Java Sindoro-Sumbing is analyzed by interviewing the law effectiveness action  and also using qualitative analysis approach. The result of this research shows that the law protection for Kopi Arabika Java Sindoro-Sumbing’s Geographical Indication has given the right and protection for it. Based on juridical aspect it has been regulated in Law Number 20 of 2016 about trademark and Geographical Indication Jo. Government Regulation Number 51 of 2007 about Geographical Indication. Yet in the practical fact those laws have not work as they should be. Due to many violations of the using of Geographical Indication right and also the violation cases settlement that hasn’t been continued. So that, the law enforcement is needed to solve the settlement on Geographical Indication violations, either with litigation or non-litigation.Key Words: Law Protection; Geographical Indication; Kopi Arabika Java Sindoro-Sumbing.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan mengkaji isu hukum dan untuk mengetahui upaya hukum penyelesaian  sengketa dibidang Indikasi Geografis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris (sosiologis/ non doktrinal). Sifat penelitian deskriptif dan obyek penelitian di Kelompok Tani Kopi Bina Sejahtera dan Masyarakat Pelindung Indikasi Geografis Kopi Arabika Java Sindor-Sumbing dilakukan dengan wawancara terhadap efektivitas hukum dan pendekatananalisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini diketahui bahwa bentuk perlindungan hukum Indikasi Geografis Kopi Arabika Java Sindoro-Sumbing secara yuridis telah diatur melalui UndangUndang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis Jo. Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 51 Tahun 2007 tentang Indikasi Geografis. namun dalam prakteknya perlindungan tidak berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. Karna masih terjadinya bentuk pelanggaran penggunaan tanpa hak tanda Indikasi Geografis dan masih terdapat kasus pelanggaran yang belum ditindaklanjuti dalam penyelesaiaanya. Sehingga diperlukan upaya hukum untuk menyelesaikan sengketa atas pelanggaran Indikasi Geografis baik secara non litigasi dan litigasi.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan hukum; Indikasi Geografis; Kopi Arabika Java Sindoro-Sumbing.","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127777403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PENYELUNDUPAN HUKUM PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DI INDONESIA","authors":"Prasetyo Ade Witoko, Ambar Budhisulistyawati","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43015","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract  This article aims to find out about interfaith marriage arrangements carried out through legal  smuggling in Indonesia. This study is a descriptive doctrinal legal research. Data sources from this article are in the form of primary legal material and secondary legal material. The technique of collecting legal material in this article is the library study technique. The approach in this  research is the legislative approach. The result of the article is that marriage according to the  Marriage Law is a marriage carried out according to each religion and belief. So that marriage is considered valid if according to the religion and beliefs of each prospective husband and wife is also valid. Every religion cannot authorize interfaith marriages, because all religions want their followers to marry the same religion, it can be concluded that interfaith marriages are not legal, because they are not in accordance with the contents of the Marriage Law, namely marriage is valid if carried out according to each religion -one, then avoidance of the law that should apply or can be said to be an act of legal smuggling.Keywords: Marriage; Different Religion Marriage; Law SmugglingAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui mengenai pengaturan perkawinan beda agama yang  dilakukan melalui penyelundupan hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum doktrinal bersifat deskriptif. Sumber data dari artikel ini yaitu berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Tehnik pengumpulan bahan hukum dalam artikel ini adalah tehnik studi kepustakaan. Pendekatan dalam penilitian ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil artikel yaitu perkawinan menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan adalah perkawinan yang dilaksanakan menurut agama dan kepercayaan masing-masing. Sehingga perkawinan dianggap sah jika menurut agama dan kepercayaan masing-masing calon suami istri tersebut juga sah. Setiap agama tidak bisa mengesahkan perkawinan beda agama, karena semua agama menginginkan umatnya untuk menikah dengan yang seagama, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa perkawinan beda agama tidak sah, karena tidak sesuai dengan isi Undang-Undang Perkawinan yaitu perkawinan adalah sah apabila dilaksanakan menurut agama dan kepercayaan masing-masing, maka dilakukan penghindaran terhadap hukum yang seharusnya berlaku atau dapat dikatakan sebagai tindakan penyelundupan hukum.Kata Kunci : Perkawinan; Perkawinan Beda Agama; Penyelundupan Hukum","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132398460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TARAF SINKRONISASI HORIZONTAL PENGATURAN IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG PERTAMBANGAN MINERAL DAN BATUBARA DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 9 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG PERUBAHAN KEDUA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH","authors":"Putri Noor Ilmi, Mochammad Najib Imanullah","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43016","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe authority to issue Mining Business Licenses based on Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning  Mineral and Coal Mining is owned by the Central Government, Provincial Government and Regency/City Government. Meanwhile, based on Law Number 9 of 2015 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government the authority to issue  Mining Business Permits is owned by the Central Government and the Provincial Government. This article objective to discuss the implications of the regulation of mining business licenses that are not synchronized and efforts to synchronize the regulation of Mining Business Permits. This article is a descriptive analytical legal research. This research was carried out by the law approach. The data used are secondary data, namely the statutory provisions, the Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, and the mining law literature with the technique of collecting study documents or library materials. So that the implications of these asynchronous arrangements can be resolved and the creation of an ideal Mining Business Permit arrangement.Keywords: Synchronization; Implications; Mining Business Licenses; Investment.AbstrakKewenangan penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun  2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara dimiliki oleh Pemerintah Pusat, Pemerintah  Provinsi, dan Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota. Sedangkan berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor  9 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah kewenangan penerbitan Izin Usaha Pertambangan dimiliki oleh Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Provinsi. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membahas mengenai implikasi pengaturan Izin Usaha Pertambangan yang tidak sinkron dan upaya sinkronisasi pengaturan Izin Usaha Pertambangan. Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum doktrinal yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan undang-undang. Data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder yaitu ketentuan perundang-undangan, Peraturan Menteri Energi dan  Sumber Daya Mineral, dan literatur hukum pertambangan dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Sehingga implikasi dari pengaturan yang tidak sinkron tersebut dapat diselesaikan dan terciptanya pengaturan Izin Usaha Pertambangan yang ideal.Kata Kunci: Sinkronisasi; Implikasi; Izin Usaha Pertambangan; Investasi.","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125169593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TINJAUAN YURIDIS ASURANSI JIWA TERHADAP KESELAMATAN PENGUNJUNG OBYEK WISATA TAMAN WISATA ALAM GROJOGAN SEWU","authors":"Mustika Larasati, Arief Suryono","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43012","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aims to discover the construction of legal relations that occur between life insurance  parties at grojogan sewu nature tourism park and their legal responsibilities. Legal relations are connections regulated by law that provides rights and obligations. Whereas legal responsibility here means that there are obligations and rights that must be fulfilled in accordance with both agreement and the applicable laws and regulations. The method used is of descriptive normative legal research. Based on the results of the research, construction of legal relations that occur between managers and insurance companies related to visitors as the insured that is each visitor insured by the manager to the insurance company. Managers with visitors, namely the relationship of buying and selling tourism services. An insurance company with visitors, in the form of a company obligation with visitors to a tourist park that is optional and must be insurance. The responsibility of the guarantor is facultative that means the insured are based there or not an evenemen, if no one evenemen the obligation for insurance companies was not there and otherwise, and tourist attractions that visitors obligation to pay premiums.Whereas in legal responsibility, the insured can ask for legal responsibility in accordance with the insurance agreement, namely fulfillment of material losses and if not satisfied, the insured can ask for legal responsibility in accordance with the law, namely in fulfilling immaterial losses. However, if the insured in this case still does not meet the meeting point, a settlement could be made. Disputes settlement could be carried out through litigation and non-litigation.Keywords: insured; insurance; legal relations; legal responsibilities.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui konstruksi hubungan hukum yang terjadi antar pihak  dalam asuransi jiwa pada Taman Wisata Alam Grojogan Sewu dan tanggung jawab hukum bagi pengelola. Hubungan hukum adalah hubungan yang diatur oleh hukum yang menimbulkan hak dan kewajiban. Sedangkan  tanggung jawab hukum disini dimaksudkan adanya kewajiban dan hak yang harus dipenuhi sesuai dengan perjanjian maupun peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif bersifat deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian konstruksi hubungan hukum yang terjadi antara pengelola dengan perusahaan asuransi berkaitan dengan pengunjung sebagai tertanggung yaitu setiap pengunjung diasuransikan oleh pengelola kepada perusahaan asuransi. Pengelola dengan pengunjung yaitu adanya hubungan jual beli jasa pariwisata. Perusahaan asuransi dengan pengunjung yaitu berupa kewajiban perusahaan dengan pengunjung taman wisata yang bersifat fakultatif wajib asuransi. Adanya tanggung jawab penanggung bersifat fakultatif berarti pada pertanggungan didasarkan ada atau tidaknya suatu evenemen, apabila tidak ada suatu evenemen maka kewajiban bagi perusahaan asuransi itu tidak ada begitu pula s","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127989633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ANALISIS PERJANJIAN PARA PIHAK YANG MELAKUKAN TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI BITCOIN YANG MENGGUNAKAN FASILITAS WEBSITE INDODAX","authors":"Teguh Wisnu Wardhana, Yudho Taruno Muryanto","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43019","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article writing aims to study the bitcoin buying and selling transactions that are facilitated  by the Indodax website according to the rule of law in Indonesia and protection for those who conduct bitcoin buying and selling transactions in Indonesia.This legal research is normative  legal research that acts prescriptively and applied. Request submitted to the user. The technique  of obtaining legal material used uses basic materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques draw conclusions from a debate that draws general attention to the concrete problems needed.Bitcoin buying and selling transactions facilitated by the first Indodax website are in accordance with the principles of agreement and the legal requirements contained in the Civil Code, the first in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and Government Regulations Number 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Systems and Electronic Transactions, and the third in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. With the issuance of the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency Regulation No. 5 of 2019 concerning the Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Market of Crypto Assets (Crypto Assets) on the Futures Exchange, the bitcoin buying and selling transaction has been approved and supported by law in Indonesia. Regulations on how to buy bitcoin, the requirements for establishing the physical market for crypto assets or exchanges, and the procedure for disputing approval. Legal protection of bitcoin buying and selling transactions is divided into several aspects of privacy, the intensity of legal subjects, object transactions, and the responsibility of the parties.Keywords : bitcoin;  buy and sell;  indodaxAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keabsahan perjanjian transaksi jual beli bitcoin yang difasilitasi website Indodax menurut kaidah hukum di indonesia dan perlindungan bagi para pihak yang melakukan transaksi jual beli bitcoin di indonesia. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang penulis gunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang penulis gunakan yakni dengan cara pengumpulan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik analisis bahan hukum dilakukan secara deduktif yakni menarik kesimpulan dari suatu permasalahan yang bersifat umum terhadap permasalah konkret yang dihadapi.Transaksi jual beli bitcoin yang difasilitasi website Indodax yang pertama telah sesuai dengan asas-asas perjanjian dan syarat sah perjanjian yang terkandung dalam Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Perdata, yang kedua telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik, d","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121736601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA ATAS KARYA LAGU DAN MUSIK DALAM BENTUK PENJUALAN VCD ATAU DVD BAJAKAN DI YOGYAKARTA","authors":"Dewi Prapmasari, M. Hudi Asrori S.","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43004","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aims to determine the perceptions of sellers and buyers about the sale of pirated VCD DVDs regulated in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and to know what factors can improve their legal protection.. The research methodology used is empirical research, namely  secondary data published, for further research on primary data in the field or for the community.  Legal research materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, techniques used in collecting legal materials are observation, interviews and study of documents or library materials. The results of the research show that the Copyright Law makes songs and music works as one of the protected creations, but there are still many people who do copyright by trading pirated DVDs or VCDs. The perception of the seller who is related to the Copyright Law concerning the need for the Act so as not to involve copyrighted parties, but there must also be a policy thatno related party sells pirated VCDs or DVDs. In law enforcement the Copyright Act has several inhibiting factors, namely the legal factors themselves, law enforcement factors, facilities factors, community factors, cultural factors.Keywords: Offense; Copyright; Pirated VCD or DVD.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi para pelaku jualbeli mengenai penjualan DVD  atau VCD bajakan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan mengetahui faktor-faktor apa saja yang menghambat perlindungan hukumnya. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian empiris, yaitu meneliti data sekunder pada awalnya,  untuk kemudian dilanjutkan penelitian terhadap data primer di lapangan atau terhadap masyarakat.  Bahan penelitian hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, teknik yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah observasi, wawancara dan studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Undang- Undang Hak Cipta menjadikan karya lagu dan musik sebagai salah satu ciptaan yang dilindungi, namun masih banyak masyarakat yang melakukan pelanggaran hak cipta dengan memperjualbelikan DVD atau VCD bajakan. Persepsi para pelaku jualbeli terkait Undang-Undang Hak Cipta ialah pentingnya keberadaan UndangUndang tersebut agar tidak merugikan pihak pemegang hak cipta, namun perlu ada kebijakan agar tidak merugikan pihak pelaku jualbeli VCD atau DVD bajakan. Dalam penegakan hukum Undang-Undang Hak Cipta terdapat beberapa faktor yang penghambat yaitu faktor hukumnya  sendiri, faktor penegak hukum, faktor sarana dan fasilitas, faktor masyarakat, faktor kebudayaan.Kata Kunci: Pelanggaran; Hak Cipta; VCD atau DVD Bajakan.","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125830094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PROSES PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN INDONESIA (LAPSPI)","authors":"Yosua Gabriel Pradipta, Dona Budi Kharisma","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43020","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis articels discusses how to discuss the process of dispute resolution at the Indonesian Institute  for Alternative Banking Dispute Resolution (LAPSPI). In this study, the author uses empirical legal research methods. This research is descriptive. By referring to the invitation, the primary legal material used in this study is the legislation and secondary legal materials used consisting of legal books and relevant legal journals. The technique of answering legal material carried out by the author in this legal discussion is in the form of library studies, interviews or interviews. This study uses a qualitative method. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it was concluded that LAPSPI had 3 (three) services that could be used to complement banks that is mediation, adjudication, and arbitration.Keywords: Banking disputes; LAPSPI; Banking Dispute Settlement.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan unutk mengetahui bagaimana proses penyelesaian sengketa di Lembaga  Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Indonesia (LAPSPI). Pada penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif. Dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, bahan hukum primer yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa peraturan perundang-undangan serta bahan hukum sekunder yang digunakan berupa buku-buku hukum dan jurnal hukum yang relevan. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang dilakukan oleh penulis di dalam penulisan hukum ini berupa studi kepustakaan, wawancara atau interview. Teknik analisa bahan hukum dalam penelitian ini yaitu menggunakan metode kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan dihasilkan kesimpulan yaitu LAPSPI  memiliki 3 (tiga) layanan yang dapat digunakan dalam menyelesaikan sengketa perbankan yaitu  mediasi, ajudikasi, dan arbitrase.Kata kunci : Sengketa perbankan; LAPSPI; Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan.","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114789540","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ASPEK HUKUM PROSES DIVESTASI SAHAM OLEH PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN ASING","authors":"Melati Adventine Christi Silitonga, Adi Sulistiyono","doi":"10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43011","url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis article aims to examine the legal aspects of the share divestment process carried out by  foreign mining companies in Indonesia and related to the obligation of the share divestment process offered to Indonesian Participants by Foreign Mining Companies according to the applicable legislation. This method of writing is legal research with a statute approach. Based on the research, the divestment arrangements in Indonesia still intersect with the non-compliance  of foreign mining companies and the uncertainty of regulations in the past, so that the divestment  process of foreign mining companies such as PT Freeport Indonesia had problems with the Government. The problem during the divestment of PT Freeport Indonesia's shares due to the incompatibility of permits granted by the Government through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources to PT Freeport Indonesia was feared to provide bad influences for foreign mining companies which would later also divest.Keywords: divestment; share; law; miningAbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji aspek hukum dari proses divestasi saham yang dilakukan  oleh perusahaan pertambangan asing di Indonesia dan terkait dengan kewajiban proses divestasi saham yang ditawarkan kepada Peserta Indonesia oleh Perusahaan Pertambangan Asing menurut perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Metode penulisan ini adalah legal research dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Berdasarkan penelitian, pengaturan divestasi di Indonesia masih bersinggungan dengan ketidakpatuhan perusahaan pertambangan asing serta ketidaktegasan peraturan di masa lalu sehingga membuat proses divestasi perusahaan pertambangan asing seperti PT Freeport Indonesia sempat bermasalah dengan Pemerintah.. Permasalahan selama divestasi saham PT Freeport Indonesia terbentur pada ketidaksesuaian izin yang diberikan oleh Pemerintah melalui Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral kepada PT Freeport Indonesia dikhawatirkan dapat memberikan influensi yang buruk bagi perusahaanperusahaan pertambangan asing yang nantinya juga akan melakukan divestasi.Kata kunci: divestasi; saham; hukum; pertambangan","PeriodicalId":352570,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132139752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}