Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-34-38
N. A. Latysheva
{"title":"Records Management in Judicial Councils in Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation (within the Framework of Assurance of Safekeeping of Documents on Their Activities in the Archive Fund of the Russian Federation)","authors":"N. A. Latysheva","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-34-38","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-34-38","url":null,"abstract":"The councils of judges in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, as well as the general meetings of judges of individual courts, being the bodies of the judicial community, conduct their own documents management systems. The insufficiency of regulation in the field of paperwork of these bodies forms uncertainty in the matters of recruiting their archival collections. This article has made an attempt to develop prospects for improving activities to maintain information about the work of the Soviets of judges of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation as part of the Archival Fund of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131747105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-43-46
E. V. Lebedeva
{"title":"The Category of Other Economic Activities: A View of a Legislator and a Law Enforcer","authors":"E. V. Lebedeva","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-43-46","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-43-46","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the correlation of such categories as “economic activity”, “economic activity”, “professional activity”, “entrepreneurial activity”, “trading activity”. The study is built within the intersectoral aspect. The author emphasizes that currently there is no legal definition of some of the categories under consideration, which creates problems in law enforcement. As part of the study of the aspects under consideration, methods such as comparative legal and analysis are used. The concept of economic activity is revealed in the article through the interpretation of the category “economic entity”. The author adheres to the position that the correct qualification of the legal relationship (as arising from trade, entrepreneurial, economic or economic activity) generates the correct application of legal norms to the regulation of the specified social relationship.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131687656","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Commissioning of a Forensic Examination in Civil Proceedings in Terms of Adversariality and Equality of the Parties","authors":"Danil K. Ustsov","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-9-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-9-13","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the implementation of the principles of competitiveness and equality of parties in civil proceedings when appointing forensic examinations. The author notes that the current legal regulation does not properly ensure their observance, considers the problem through specific examples from judicial practice. It is concluded that the courts should carry out a number of preparatory measures before the appointment of forensic examinations, motivate the expediency of appointing a repeated or additional examination, as well as rejecting the arguments of the parties. The best form of expressing the position of the court should be considered a reasoned ruling that can be appealed.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"24 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128450147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29
N. A. Morozova
{"title":"Evidence Tampering in Administrative Offense Cases: Specific Features of Evaluation by Commercial Courts","authors":"N. A. Morozova","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29","url":null,"abstract":"The article reports about the falsification of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. The text gives the concept of “falsification”, “falsified proof”, examples are given. The author describes the rules for verifying the application for falsification in arbitration courts, compares the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, indicates the difference between the norms of these codes. Article contains a description of judicial practice and an analysis of the most common problems.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131199408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53
Lyubov N. Skoromnaya
{"title":"The Legal Force of Commercial Court Rulings: A Legal Fact or Terminological Inaccuracy in Law Enforcement?","authors":"Lyubov N. Skoromnaya","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53","url":null,"abstract":"Sometimes, due to the inertia of the emerging judicial practice in the application of procedural legislation, arbitration courts lose sight of some significant procedural tools that are provided to them by the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. In practice, this creates difficulties in the execution and reversal of the execution of judicial acts. Let us examine this problem using the example of the arbitration court rulings.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"14 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113977127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-22-25
D. Garbatovich
{"title":"Problems of Qualification of Justifiable Defense","authors":"D. Garbatovich","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-22-25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-22-25","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the problem of the algorithm of qualification of the necessary defense. Examples of erroneous application of the criminal law are shown when, having correctly established the actual circumstances of the case, the courts did not correctly assess: 1) the presence or absence of grounds for the right to necessary defense; 2) the degree and nature of the danger of encroachment; 3) the limits of defense, depending on the nature of the danger of encroachment; 4) the motives of the defending person.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125205959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17
O. Shemeneva
{"title":"The Meaning of Procedural Objections of the Defendant in View of Some Legal Positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation","authors":"O. Shemeneva","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17","url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the idea expressed in the Concept of a Uniform Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as well as in some of Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation acts, on the establishment of deadlines for the application of objections regarding the competence of the court considering the case. The author supports this idea and makes additional arguments. At the same time, it is justified that the role of the defendant’s objections in its implementation is significantly exaggerated. The court itself is obliged to apply the consequences of initiating a case in violation of competence on its own initiative. But now this duty is limited in time. And the role of the defendant’s procedural objections remains the same as before — reminding the court of his duty.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129112782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-30-34
Ilya I. Pisarevsky
{"title":"Administrative Jurisdiction in the Aspect of Criminal Proceedings: A Comparison Based on the Functional Approach","authors":"Ilya I. Pisarevsky","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-30-34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-30-34","url":null,"abstract":"It is stipulated that exactly in sphere of procedural relationships the problems, arisen in sphere of substantive law due to similarity of criminal and administrative jurisdictions, exist. Based on previous provisions the author proves thesis that administrative jurisdiction suffers essential procedural problems caused by refusal to adopt institutes from criminal procedure law. Meanwhile it is notes that nowadays the necessity of unification criminal and administrative procedure still underestimates on the government level.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"1120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116071808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-39-42
O. Filonova
{"title":"Legal and Doctrinal Justification of the Request of the Soviet Society for Creation of a Unified Judicial Center, the Supreme Court of RSFSR","authors":"O. Filonova","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-39-42","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-39-42","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the relations connected with the establishment of the Supreme Court of the RSFSR in 1923. The approaches to the legislative consolidation and solution of practical issues of the organization of the Supreme Court of the RSFSR are being investigated, when with the end of the Civil war there was a request for a judicial system that would eliminate dualism associated with the existence of a system of revolutionary tribunals, ensure the rule of law and contribute to the protection of new social relations. It is concluded that the creation of the Supreme Court as the highest centralized judicial body with cassation, supervisory, control, and leadership functions, with activities for instructing courts and interpreting law, allowed the implementation of the principle of a single court, understood as the unity of the judicial system. The study shows that the highest party and Soviet authorities took part in solving organizational and personnel issues at the establishment of the Supreme Court of the RSFSR. The article analyzes issues related to determining the limits of independence of the Supreme Court of the RSFSR and its relations with other bodies. The Supreme Court of the RSFSR was the highest judicial link for courts of general jurisdiction and for special courts, creating conditions for ensuring the unity of judicial practice in the RSFSR.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130918257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Court administratorPub Date : 2023-06-08DOI: 10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-17-21
E. Mikhaylova
{"title":"The State as a Party to Action Proceedings under the Russian Law","authors":"E. Mikhaylova","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-17-21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-17-21","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the problem of correlation of the civil-legal status of the state as a subject of private law, with its procedural-legal status as a party to the action proceedings. It is shown that within the framework of private law relations the state realizes the public interest, changes to the current procedural legislation are proposed.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122931655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}