{"title":"行政违法案件中的证据篡改:商事法庭评价的特点","authors":"N. A. Morozova","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reports about the falsification of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. The text gives the concept of “falsification”, “falsified proof”, examples are given. The author describes the rules for verifying the application for falsification in arbitration courts, compares the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, indicates the difference between the norms of these codes. Article contains a description of judicial practice and an analysis of the most common problems.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence Tampering in Administrative Offense Cases: Specific Features of Evaluation by Commercial Courts\",\"authors\":\"N. A. Morozova\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article reports about the falsification of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. The text gives the concept of “falsification”, “falsified proof”, examples are given. The author describes the rules for verifying the application for falsification in arbitration courts, compares the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, indicates the difference between the norms of these codes. Article contains a description of judicial practice and an analysis of the most common problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court administrator\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court administrator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence Tampering in Administrative Offense Cases: Specific Features of Evaluation by Commercial Courts
The article reports about the falsification of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. The text gives the concept of “falsification”, “falsified proof”, examples are given. The author describes the rules for verifying the application for falsification in arbitration courts, compares the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, indicates the difference between the norms of these codes. Article contains a description of judicial practice and an analysis of the most common problems.