Commissioning of a Forensic Examination in Civil Proceedings in Terms of Adversariality and Equality of the Parties

Danil K. Ustsov
{"title":"Commissioning of a Forensic Examination in Civil Proceedings in Terms of Adversariality and Equality of the Parties","authors":"Danil K. Ustsov","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-9-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the implementation of the principles of competitiveness and equality of parties in civil proceedings when appointing forensic examinations. The author notes that the current legal regulation does not properly ensure their observance, considers the problem through specific examples from judicial practice. It is concluded that the courts should carry out a number of preparatory measures before the appointment of forensic examinations, motivate the expediency of appointing a repeated or additional examination, as well as rejecting the arguments of the parties. The best form of expressing the position of the court should be considered a reasoned ruling that can be appealed.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"24 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-9-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the implementation of the principles of competitiveness and equality of parties in civil proceedings when appointing forensic examinations. The author notes that the current legal regulation does not properly ensure their observance, considers the problem through specific examples from judicial practice. It is concluded that the courts should carry out a number of preparatory measures before the appointment of forensic examinations, motivate the expediency of appointing a repeated or additional examination, as well as rejecting the arguments of the parties. The best form of expressing the position of the court should be considered a reasoned ruling that can be appealed.
在当事人对抗性和平等的民事诉讼中委托法医鉴定
该条专门讨论在指派法医检查时在民事诉讼中执行各方竞争和平等原则。作者指出,现行的法律规定并没有很好地保证这些权利的遵守,并通过司法实践中的具体例子来思考这一问题。结论是,法院应在指定法医检查之前采取一些准备措施,鼓励指定重复或额外检查的权宜之计,以及拒绝各方的论点。表达法院立场的最佳形式应被视为可以上诉的合理裁决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信