从俄罗斯联邦最高法院的一些法律立场看被告程序性异议的意义

O. Shemeneva
{"title":"从俄罗斯联邦最高法院的一些法律立场看被告程序性异议的意义","authors":"O. Shemeneva","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the idea expressed in the Concept of a Uniform Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as well as in some of Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation acts, on the establishment of deadlines for the application of objections regarding the competence of the court considering the case. The author supports this idea and makes additional arguments. At the same time, it is justified that the role of the defendant’s objections in its implementation is significantly exaggerated. The court itself is obliged to apply the consequences of initiating a case in violation of competence on its own initiative. But now this duty is limited in time. And the role of the defendant’s procedural objections remains the same as before — reminding the court of his duty.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Meaning of Procedural Objections of the Defendant in View of Some Legal Positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation\",\"authors\":\"O. Shemeneva\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the idea expressed in the Concept of a Uniform Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as well as in some of Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation acts, on the establishment of deadlines for the application of objections regarding the competence of the court considering the case. The author supports this idea and makes additional arguments. At the same time, it is justified that the role of the defendant’s objections in its implementation is significantly exaggerated. The court itself is obliged to apply the consequences of initiating a case in violation of competence on its own initiative. But now this duty is limited in time. And the role of the defendant’s procedural objections remains the same as before — reminding the court of his duty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court administrator\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court administrator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-13-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了《俄罗斯联邦统一民事诉讼法的概念》以及俄罗斯联邦最高法院的一些法律中所表达的关于为审理案件的法院的权限规定适用异议的最后期限的想法。作者支持这一观点,并提出了额外的论据。同时,被告的反对意见在其实施中的作用被明显夸大,这是合理的。法院本身有义务主动适用违反权限提起诉讼的后果。但现在这项职责是有时间限制的。被告的程序性反对的作用和以前一样——提醒法院他的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Meaning of Procedural Objections of the Defendant in View of Some Legal Positions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation
The article analyzes the idea expressed in the Concept of a Uniform Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, as well as in some of Supreme Courts of the Russian Federation acts, on the establishment of deadlines for the application of objections regarding the competence of the court considering the case. The author supports this idea and makes additional arguments. At the same time, it is justified that the role of the defendant’s objections in its implementation is significantly exaggerated. The court itself is obliged to apply the consequences of initiating a case in violation of competence on its own initiative. But now this duty is limited in time. And the role of the defendant’s procedural objections remains the same as before — reminding the court of his duty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信