{"title":"商事法庭裁决的法律效力:执法中的法律事实还是术语不准确?","authors":"Lyubov N. Skoromnaya","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sometimes, due to the inertia of the emerging judicial practice in the application of procedural legislation, arbitration courts lose sight of some significant procedural tools that are provided to them by the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. In practice, this creates difficulties in the execution and reversal of the execution of judicial acts. Let us examine this problem using the example of the arbitration court rulings.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"14 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legal Force of Commercial Court Rulings: A Legal Fact or Terminological Inaccuracy in Law Enforcement?\",\"authors\":\"Lyubov N. Skoromnaya\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sometimes, due to the inertia of the emerging judicial practice in the application of procedural legislation, arbitration courts lose sight of some significant procedural tools that are provided to them by the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. In practice, this creates difficulties in the execution and reversal of the execution of judicial acts. Let us examine this problem using the example of the arbitration court rulings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Court administrator\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Court administrator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-47-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Legal Force of Commercial Court Rulings: A Legal Fact or Terminological Inaccuracy in Law Enforcement?
Sometimes, due to the inertia of the emerging judicial practice in the application of procedural legislation, arbitration courts lose sight of some significant procedural tools that are provided to them by the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. In practice, this creates difficulties in the execution and reversal of the execution of judicial acts. Let us examine this problem using the example of the arbitration court rulings.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
