Evidence Tampering in Administrative Offense Cases: Specific Features of Evaluation by Commercial Courts

N. A. Morozova
{"title":"Evidence Tampering in Administrative Offense Cases: Specific Features of Evaluation by Commercial Courts","authors":"N. A. Morozova","doi":"10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reports about the falsification of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. The text gives the concept of “falsification”, “falsified proof”, examples are given. The author describes the rules for verifying the application for falsification in arbitration courts, compares the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, indicates the difference between the norms of these codes. Article contains a description of judicial practice and an analysis of the most common problems.","PeriodicalId":301802,"journal":{"name":"Court administrator","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Court administrator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2072-3636-2023-2-26-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reports about the falsification of evidence in cases of administrative offenses. The text gives the concept of “falsification”, “falsified proof”, examples are given. The author describes the rules for verifying the application for falsification in arbitration courts, compares the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation, indicates the difference between the norms of these codes. Article contains a description of judicial practice and an analysis of the most common problems.
行政违法案件中的证据篡改:商事法庭评价的特点
本文就行政违法案件中的证据伪造问题进行了论述。本文给出了“证伪”、“证伪证明”的概念,并举例说明。作者介绍了在仲裁法院核实伪造申请的规则,比较了俄罗斯联邦行政法和俄罗斯联邦仲裁程序法,指出了这两种法典规范之间的区别。文章对司法实践中最常见的问题进行了描述和分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信