ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition最新文献_第5页

The Art of Memory in the Imagines of Philostratus the Elder: arguments and assumptions 老菲洛斯特拉托斯想象中的记忆艺术:论证与假设

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-596-616

Eugene A. Makovetsky, A. Drikker

引用次数: 0

Aphrodite Ζείδωρος: the subversion of the myth of Prometheus and Pandora in Empedocles 阿芙罗狄蒂Ζείδωρος:颠覆了恩培多克勒斯的普罗米修斯和潘多拉神话

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-430-450

David Hernández Castro

引用次数: 0

Protagoras’ Homo mensura as the criterion of truth 普罗泰哥拉的《人观》作为真理的标准

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-695-704

N. Volkova

{"title":"Protagoras’ Homo mensura as the criterion of truth","authors":"N. Volkova","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-695-704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-695-704","url":null,"abstract":"The article is about an interpretation of the concept of Measure in the famous thesis of Protagoras (TP) “Man is the Measure of all things” as a criterion of knowledge. The main purpose of this work is to show how the concept of “measure” was gradually transformed into the criterion of truth. The answer to this question can be found in the relevant passages of Plato’s “Theaetetus” and Sextus Empiricus’ “Adversus Mathematicos” and “Outlines of Pyrrhonism”. In the “Theaetetus” Plato represents “the secret doctrine” of Protagoras. According to Ugo Zilioli this doctrine is a robust version of relativism, encompassing different types of it: Relativism of Truth, Relativism of Being and Relativism of Knowledge. Among the other interpretations of the concept of Measure, Plato proposes the following substitution: “to be a Measure” means “to possess the criterion of knowledge”. This replacement allowed Plato to show the internal inconsistency of the TP. In the works of Sextus the concept of Measure in TP is unambiguously interpreted as the criterion of knowledge. For Plato the word criterion is still a philosophical neologism, but in the Hellenistic period it becomes an oft-used philosophical term.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116532261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Bentham on definition of fictitious entities and on Aristotle’s predicaments 边沁论虚拟实体的定义与亚里士多德的困境

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-339-348

V. Ogleznev

引用次数: 1

The Strasburg Papyrus of Empedocles (The Final Part). A Commented Translation 恩培多克勒斯的斯特拉斯堡莎草纸(最后部分)。注释翻译

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2020-14-2-812-825

引用次数: 0

A New Book on Sosipatra of Pergamum 一本关于别迦摩的索西帕特拉的新书

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-360-369

Mikhail Vedeshkin

引用次数: 0

The grammatical treatise "De Analogia" and linguistic conservatism of Julius Caesar in the context of the ancient "language policy" 古代“语言政策”语境下的语法专著《论类比》与凯撒的语言保守主义

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-315-329

R. Svetlov, D. Fedorov

引用次数: 0

Maximus of Tyre on Socrates’ daimonion (Or. 8–9)

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-317-333

Alexei Garadja

{"title":"Maximus of Tyre on Socrates’ daimonion (Or. 8–9)","authors":"Alexei Garadja","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-317-333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-317-333","url":null,"abstract":"Maximus of Tyre (fl. late 2nd century ad) is most poorly and confusedly attested in ancient sources. The best testimony to be found is his extant collection of 41 Orationes, or Dissertationes, addressing a wide range of topics, including the issue of ‘Socrates’ daimonion’ (Or. 8–9), which has been also dealt with by Maximus’ fellow Platonists of the Middle stage Plutarchus of Chaeronea (46 – after 119), in De Socratis demonio, and Apuleius of Madauros (c. 124 – c. 170), in De deo Socratis. All of them, with slight variations, consider demons intermediary beings shuttling between heavens and earth, gods and humans; at one point, Maximus compares them to translators who ensure contacts between people of different cultures. Maximus’ Platonism mainly manifests in his attempts to mould his own writings in the spirit and style of Plato’s works. The style is paramount for Maximus, him being not only a Platonist, but also a prominent representative of the Second Sophistic. As an eclectic philosopher, he introduces into his writings sundry Aristotelean and Stoic threads interwoven with Platonic warp and woof. Revealing himself a widely educated person, Maximus shows a good knowledge of Plato as well as other ancient authors, whose many fragments are extant solely thanks to his quotations. Maximus is scarcely known in the Russian language: a few translations of the last century are based on an obsolescent edition. As an appendix, a new Russian translation of Or. 8–9 based on thoroughly corrected editions of Maximus’ text is provided.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131228873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Earth of Xenophanes (21 B 28; A 47 DK) 色诺芬尼的地球(公元前21世纪;A 47 dk)

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-554-579

Mikhail V. Egorochkin

{"title":"The Earth of Xenophanes (21 B 28; A 47 DK)","authors":"Mikhail V. Egorochkin","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-554-579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-554-579","url":null,"abstract":"The article for the first time summarizes the views of Xenophanes of Colophon on the earth, its structure and location in the Universe. The most interesting of the fragments devoted to the topic is the fragment B 28, in which Xenophanes, according to the most ancient and modern interpreters, considers the earth to be infinite. The author demonstrates, however, that this interpretation can hardly be correct because Xenophanes speaks not about the infinity of the lower part of the earth, but its lower limit going to infinity. Trying to find out what Xenophanes means by infinity, the author shows that this concept implies both spatial and epistemological uncertainty, so that everything which goes beyond human experience, can be called infinite. Not only the lower part of the earth is infinite in this sense, but also its surface which encompasses many different regions seen as separate worlds, as well as the air going beyond the limits of visibility. Analyzing the testimonies of Pseudo-Plutarch and Hippolytus, the author shows that the Earth’s surface could have been initially made of mud which then was dried and condensed by air and fire. This solid upper part of the Earth, which can be called earth in the narrow sense of the word, can be considered as one of the four elements. However, taken as a whole the Earth of Xenophanes should not be understood as an Aristotelian first principle. Rather it represents the cosmos, that determines the measure of human knowledge, and which can be therefore described by the ancient dictum “all things are Earth” (Arist. Met. A 8, 989a 9–10).","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133335627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Educational travels of M.S. Koutorga to England and Greece: from London to Athens, including explorations in Boeotia Koutorga号邮轮到英国和希腊的教育之旅:从伦敦到雅典，包括在波奥提亚的探索

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-376-400

A. Mozhajsky

{"title":"Educational travels of M.S. Koutorga to England and Greece: from London to Athens, including explorations in Boeotia","authors":"A. Mozhajsky","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-376-400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-376-400","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the educational travels of the outstanding Russian researcher of antiquity M.S. Koutorga, which he made in England and Greece. In the existing publications on the activities of M.S. Koutorga the trip to England has not been paid attention. This trip can be seen as preparation for a later visit to Greece, where M.S. Koutorga conducted research, especially in Boeotia. In England, Koutorga visited the famous researcher on the ancient topography of Greece, Colonel William Martin Leake, who presented M.S. Kutorga with three of his works. Colonel Leake, through a chain of personal connections, recommended Koutorga to Cambridge, Oxford, and the British Museum. In addition, Mikhail Semenovich became a member of the Cavendish Literary Club, as mentioned in a letter from Lionel Buda. Thus, with the necessary literature, M. S. Koutorga knew the places of Greece that had been less affected by previous explorations, giving him the opportunity to make his own. Having visited Greece, M. S. Koutorga also secured the necessary references. He was associated with A. M. Kumanis, A. R. Rangavis, I. K. Paparrigopoulos, and other statesmen and scientists in Greece. All this made it possible to organize the journey in the best possible way and to carry out research for subsequent publications, among which the study of the Plataean region in Boeotia occupied a special place. The article is based on archival material, most of which is published for the first time, and is accompanied by a map of the region of Plataea, on which the names mentioned by Koutorga are inscribed.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132118020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0