ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition最新文献_第4页

Traduttore traditore: Problems in Translation of Plato’s Theaetetus 翻译platos Theaetetus的问题

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-842-850

I. Protopopova

{"title":"Traduttore traditore: Problems in Translation of Plato’s Theaetetus","authors":"I. Protopopova","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-842-850","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-842-850","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this short note is to show by concrete examples how in some Russian (among others) translations of Plato’s Theaetetus the meaning changes to its exact opposite, which, of course, not only significantly complicates the understanding of the text for the reader inexperienced in ancient Greek, but sometimes brings him to an unsolvable logical impasse. The article analyzes two examples from T.V. Vasilyeva’s translation in comparison with some other translations and focusing on the corresponding contexts of the dialogue: Th. 160e7–8 and 164c7–d2. It is important that these are not some run-of-the-mill passages, but the key points for Plato to build the logic of Sophists: in the first case, he shows the necessary absence of the subject of sensation in the concept of universal movement; in the second, the role of the “agreement on words” in the eristic strategy of Sophists. In both cases, Vasilyeva’s translation, unfortunately, can only confuse the reader and make him doubt the logic and coherence of the Platonic text. From the point of view of the history of Plato’s translations, it would be interesting to consider possible sources of error in the first example (Th. 160e7–8) from multilingual translators of different epochs. From the practical point of view, the analysis of Vasilyeva’s translation of the Theaetetus, included in the “canonical” Russian-language edition of Plato, shows one thing: a new translation of the Theaetetus into Russian is earnestly needed.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132790123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Heraclides called Lembus 赫拉克利得斯叫兰布斯

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-760-781

Mikhail V. Egorochkin

{"title":"Heraclides called Lembus","authors":"Mikhail V. Egorochkin","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-760-781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-760-781","url":null,"abstract":"The Hellenistic statesman, scholar and historian Heraclides Lembus is a highly ambiguous and enigmatic figure. One of the most intriguing things is his nickname Λέμβος. According to Diogenes Laertius, it was given to him for his work Λεμβευτικὸς λόγος (D.L. V, 94). However, the meaning of Heraclides’ nickname is difficult to understand, since Diogenes’ testimony is the only one that mentions this work, and the word λεμβευτικός itself is a hapax. The article carefully examines all available evidence about the life and writings of Heraclides Lembus, using all relevant materials and parallels. As a result, the author comes to the conclusion that the title Λεμβευτικὸς λόγος did not have a figurative meaning, as has often been thought. Instead, the work in question was most likely dedicated to the ordinary λέμβος-sailing. As for Heraclides’ nickname, it was not so much due to the writing of epitomes, as some scholars still believe, but to Heraclides’ interest in secondary literature. Heraclides Lembus was probably the first to epitomize a secondhand rather than primary sources – a fact reflected in his remarkable nickname.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114256244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

On the capability of Aristotle’s ethics to become the first philosophy 论亚里士多德伦理学成为第一哲学的能力

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-648-656

A. Sanzhenakov

引用次数: 0

The Goddess Venus in Lucretius’ poem ‘De rerum natura’ 卢克莱修诗歌《自然之魂》中的维纳斯女神

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-153-179

Timothey Myakin

引用次数: 0

A Yesterday Battle over the Tomorrow Sea Battle 昨天的海战，明天的海战

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-2-657-669

P. Butakov

引用次数: 0

Julian’s Apostates: Conversion to Paganism in the Middle of the Fourth Century 朱利安的叛教者:四世纪中叶向异教的皈依

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-672-702

Mikhail Vedeshkin

引用次数: 0

A dual-process approach to faith, doubt, and diakrisis 对信仰、怀疑和危机的双重处理方法

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-1084-1097

P. Butakov

引用次数: 0

The argument about the river provided by Heraclitus of Ephesus and the need for a temporal dimension in its logical form 以弗所的赫拉克利特提出的关于河流的论点，以及在其逻辑形式中需要一个时间维度

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-8-18

Miguel López‐Astorga

引用次数: 1

Orphica I: from the Derveni Papyrus to the “Orphic” Gold Tablets 奥菲斯卡1:从德尔维尼纸莎草到“奥菲斯”金碑

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-87-119

Eugene Afonasin

{"title":"Orphica I: from the Derveni Papyrus to the “Orphic” Gold Tablets","authors":"Eugene Afonasin","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-87-119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-87-119","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is concentrated on the Derveni papyrus. According to the cosmology of the papyrus Zeus recreated the world anew. The meaning of this self-contained process may indicate the poet's desire to reflect the cyclicity of time, manifested in the alternation of the one and the many. Besides, this model may be related to the famous Orphic idea of the cyclic life of the soul. It is also possible that we are facing the first example of the cosmological scheme, which we later find in Heraclides of Pontus, and I think that it is no accident that the doxographer (or Heraclides himself) attributes it to the Orphics, who “make each of the heavenly bodies into a cosmos” (Aetius 2.13.15). The eternally existent universe evolves thanks to the creative energy of sky (Uranus), which is concentrated in the sun. Zeus recreates this universe on earth, building a small cosmos in which we inhabit and all that we see. Developing this idea in the spirit of Giordano Bruno, we can assume that this or that deity, in the Orphic (and Pythagorean) view, recreates from the original material a unique cosmos on each of the celestial bodies, and the universe is populated by a variety of beings inhabiting all kinds of worlds.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116199127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Execution in selection task depends on Chrysippus’ criterion for the conditional 选择任务的执行取决于克里西普斯的条件准则

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-2-501-512

Miguel López‐Astorga

引用次数: 1