ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition最新文献_第10页

Scientific Theories in the Exegesis of the Book of Genesis and Christological Polemics in the First Half of the Sixth Century: Methods of Argumentation using ἀναλογία and παράδειγμα 《创世纪》释经中的科学理论与六世纪上半叶的基督辩论赛:运用ναλογ末梢α和παρ <s:2> δειγμα的论证方法

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-2-789-813

O. Nogovitsin

{"title":"Scientific Theories in the Exegesis of the Book of Genesis and Christological Polemics in the First Half of the Sixth Century: Methods of Argumentation using ἀναλογία and παράδειγμα","authors":"O. Nogovitsin","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-2-789-813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2021-15-2-789-813","url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the use of scientific theories in the exegesis of the Book of Genesis and in Christological dispute between Diophysites and Monophysites in the first half of the sixth century, focusing on the conditions under which traditional methods of rhetorical argumentation could be applied and on using scientific models for explaining the phenomena of the created nature in order to clarify the aporias from the Book of Genesis and Incarnation. The argument using παράδειγμα (example) and ἀναλογία (analogy), which belonged to the repertory of methods from the Neoplatonic scholarly tradition, made it possible to discuss such heterogeneous phenomena as created and non-created as well as divine and human in theological texts by providing the rules for correct descriptions and for verifying their theological and philosophical accuracy. These two methods are analyzed against the background of Neoplatonic commentaries of Aristotle, while their application to theology is viewed through polemical argument in John Philoponus and Leontius of Byzantium. The Monophysite Philoponus used the argument from ἀναλογία to defend the Christological formula of one composite nature of Christ, while the Chalcedonian Leontius of Byzantium employed the method of argumentation from παράδειγμα for defending the presence of two natures in Christ.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121296916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The doctrine of Eros in the Early Stoicism 早期斯多葛主义中的爱神学说

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-287-304

Rustam Galanin

引用次数: 0

Exact sciences and education in antiquity 古代的精确科学和教育

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-1-226-243

L. Zhmud

引用次数: 0

Euhemerics in early Ptolemaic Alexandria 早期托勒密时期亚历山大港的语言学

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2023-17-2-1049-1071

S. Belozerov

引用次数: 0

Vasily Mikhaylovich Severgin as Translator of Pliny the Elder: On the History of the Reception of Ancient Heritage in the Context of Russian Natural History in the 18th Century 《老普林尼》的译者——论18世纪俄罗斯自然史背景下的古代遗产接受史

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-2-791-813

D. Dorofeev

{"title":"Vasily Mikhaylovich Severgin as Translator of Pliny the Elder: On the History of the Reception of Ancient Heritage in the Context of Russian Natural History in the 18th Century","authors":"D. Dorofeev","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-2-791-813","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-2-791-813","url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the reception of the ancient heritage in European culture and its importance for the development of Russian natural science in XVIII century. For this purpose the author turns to the well-known Russian scientist and teacher Vasily Mikhajlovich Severgin (1765-1826), who was the author of the first Russian translation in Russian of the encyclopedic \"Natural History\" (Naturalis Historia) by Roman scientist Pliny the Elder (24-79 A.D.), many years was teaching at the Mining college (modern Saint-Petersburg Mining University, which celebrates its 250th anniversary in 2023) and is the most important Russian scientist in the field of natural history. It is on the study of the importance of Pliny the Elder and the history of his interpretation and translation for the development of European and especially Russian science in the 18th century that the main attention of the author of the article is directed. The article also covers the peculiarities of science and educational institutions in Russia and Europe in the 18th century; the biography of Severgin; the specifics of ancient Greek and ancient Roman science; the concept of \"natural history\" and the importance of encyclopedia as a scientific genre for the culture and science of the Enlightenment.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114872082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Zeno’s Dichotomy and the Paradox of Logical Causality 芝诺二分法与逻辑因果悖论

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-2-580-591

E. Borisov

引用次数: 0

The idea of retribution in Ancient philosophy as a prototype of the principle of causality: normativist arguments 古代哲学中作为因果原则原型的报应观念:规范主义的论证

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-386-392

A. Didikin

引用次数: 0

The emergence of the idea of a spherical sun in Greek science and philosophy 希腊科学和哲学中球形太阳观念的出现

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-236-250

D. Panchenko

{"title":"The emergence of the idea of a spherical sun in Greek science and philosophy","authors":"D. Panchenko","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-236-250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-236-250","url":null,"abstract":"According to a standard idea of Greek science and philosophy, the shape of the sun is spherical. Such an idea appears already in Aristotle who offers, however, no good account for it, and only Stobaeus cites an authority, or rather collective authority, the Pythagoreans, for an early recognition of the idea in question. The ancient tradition left no direct evidence of how the sphericity of the sun was recognized, and the issue attracted very little attention in modern scholarship. I propose that in the late sixth century new empirical knowledge about the sun reached the Aegean and Italy. Some people who crossed the northern tropic repeatedly observed the sun from its ‘other’ side, for in the height of the summer an observer located south of the northern tropic saw the midday sun in the north. This made impossible Anaximander’s idea of the sun as a body containing fire and having one aperture and triggered a search for a better version. Since the sun invariably displayed a circular outline at any time, at any place and on all sides of the horizon, one had to consider the possibility that its shape was either spherical or ‘bowl-like’. The study of lunar light that led to the discovery of the sphericity of the moon was also helpful. The doctrine of a spherical sun was firmly established by the consensus of professional astronomers rather than due to an initiative by an outstanding thinker; however, one may think that Parmenides contributed to it. A spherical sun cannot be a sphere of fire – without a container, fire would have dispersed. This problem brought about a number of theories that treated the sun as a kind of mirror, etc. Further, a spherical sun that issues a reflected light was recognized to have been a solid and hence a heavy body, which contributed to approaching the spheres of the Sun, Moon and Earth in a similar way and making the Earth a planet.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116922190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

“Art and Life”: Oscar Wilde’s Aesthetic Platonism “艺术与生活”:奥斯卡·王尔德的美学柏拉图主义

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-254-264

I. Protopopova

{"title":"“Art and Life”: Oscar Wilde’s Aesthetic Platonism","authors":"I. Protopopova","doi":"10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-254-264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-1-254-264","url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the Platonism of Oscar Wilde, starting from his studies at Trinity College and Oxford, and how it was related to his aestheticism. Plato was one of the key figures for the so-called Oxford Hellenistic movement (1850–70s of the 19th century). In its context, the “Symposium” was read almost as a manifesto of a new aestheticism, an important part of which was homoeroticism. Wilde believed that Plato should be interpreted as a “critique of Beauty” and compared a philosopher of the Platonic school with a poet. At the same time, considering himself a Platonist, Wilde turned Plato upside down. The metaphor of the “Cave” remained relevant to him as well, and the Cave itself was understood in about the same way, viz. as a vulgar sensual life with its senseless utilitarianism, taking shadows for genuine reality. But while for Plato the exit from the Cave was associated with pure comprehension in the rarefied and, most importantly, extra-figurative space of merging oneself with the transcendent, and attaining genuine virtue by this outlook for genuine reality, for Wilde, the beautiful in itself was imagery par excellence (according to Plato, the world of eidolons, the lowest sphere of being), and imagery was art, and the possibility of virtue according to Wilde is precisely fidelity to art.","PeriodicalId":228501,"journal":{"name":"ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition","volume":"129 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124953356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Theological Ontology of Leontius of Byzantium and the Circumscribability Argument in the Iconophile Polemics 拜占庭莱昂修斯的神学本体论与《亲象论战》中的可限定性论证

ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.25205/1995-4328-2022-16-2-462-481

V. Baranov

引用次数: 0