Psychological Assessment最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Establishing the measurement invariance of the Eating Disorder Inventory across Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Black or African American, and non-Hispanic White adults. 建立饮食失调量表在西班牙裔白人、非西班牙裔亚裔、非西班牙裔黑人或非洲裔美国人和非西班牙裔白人成年人中的测量不变性。
IF 3.1 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001453
Sarrah I Ali, Megan L Rogers, Christopher Schatschneider, Thomas E Joiner, Pamela K Keel
{"title":"Establishing the measurement invariance of the Eating Disorder Inventory across Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic Black or African American, and non-Hispanic White adults.","authors":"Sarrah I Ali, Megan L Rogers, Christopher Schatschneider, Thomas E Joiner, Pamela K Keel","doi":"10.1037/pas0001453","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001453","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) is one of the oldest and most widely used surveys of eating disorder thoughts and behaviors. Its recent and frequent use to study differences in eating pathology across ethnoracial groups underscores importance of establishing its measurement invariance across groups. However, mixed evidence has emerged, and studies have focused on Black, mixed-race Hispanic/Latino, and White women. The present study aimed to establish the measurement invariance of the EDI Drive for Thinness, Bulimia, Perfectionism, Maturity Fears, and Interpersonal Distrust subscales across four ethnoracial groups in a sample of women and men. Participants (<i>N</i> = 2,931) were Hispanic White (7%), non-Hispanic Asian (18%), non-Hispanic Black or African American (7%), and non-Hispanic White (68%) college students (67% female) recruited in a cohort-based epidemiological, longitudinal study of health and eating patterns. First, multigroup confirmatory factor analysis examined whether the EDI performed comparably across ethnoracial groups in the full sample. Next, the same approach was followed in sensitivity analyses within each sex. Evaluation of changes in comparative fit index indicated that full metric invariance, scalar invariance, and uniqueness were supported across ethnoracial groups in the full sample and in women (change in comparative fit index ≤ .01). Only partial measurement invariance was supported in analyses of non-Hispanic Asian and non-Hispanic White men. Analyses support use of the EDI in ethnoracially diverse samples including women and men or only women. Limited score variance in men suggests the need for tests of measurement invariance in larger samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"366-373"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910446/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring cognitive ability fairly: Measurement invariance of the KABC-II NU across parent education levels. 公平测量认知能力:kbc - ii NU在父母教育水平上的测量不变性。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-06 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001465
Audrey M Scudder,Jacqueline M Caemmerer,Kevin Melecio,Lucas Vander Ploeg,Brittany A Dale,Natalie R Charamut,Melissa A Bray,Alan S Kaufman
{"title":"Measuring cognitive ability fairly: Measurement invariance of the KABC-II NU across parent education levels.","authors":"Audrey M Scudder,Jacqueline M Caemmerer,Kevin Melecio,Lucas Vander Ploeg,Brittany A Dale,Natalie R Charamut,Melissa A Bray,Alan S Kaufman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001465","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001465","url":null,"abstract":"This study examined whether measurement invariance is supported for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition Normative Update (KABC-II NU), across parental education groups, a common proxy for socioeconomic status. Establishing measurement invariance allows for comparing scores across demographic groups and provides evidence for the assumption that the KABC-II NU measures intelligence similarly regardless of the examinee's parents' education. Data from the KABC-II NU U.S. standardization sample were analyzed in this study, which included 507 youth ages 7-18. The sample was divided into groups by the highest level of education attained by their parent(s): Grade 11 or less (n = 55), high school graduate or equivalent (n = 109), some college/tech certification/associate's degree (n = 173), and bachelor's degree (n = 165). Data were analyzed using multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Configural invariance and full metric invariance were supported. Partial intercept invariance was achieved by freeing the intercept for Block Counting. Residual invariance and equality of the first-order disturbances across groups were supported. The variance of g did not meaningfully differ across parental education, suggesting a similar degree of variability in general intelligence (width of the normal curve) across groups. The estimated latent broad ability means showed that students with less educated parents demonstrate a relative weakness in verbal comprehension. These findings provide additional validity evidence for the KABC-II NU and suggest the test is not biased against youth from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147619514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Measuring Cognitive Ability Fairly: Measurement Invariance of the KABC-II NU Across Parent Education Levels 公平测量认知能力的补充材料:KABC-II NU在父母教育水平上的测量不变性
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-02 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001465.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Measuring Cognitive Ability Fairly: Measurement Invariance of the KABC-II NU Across Parent Education Levels","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001465.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001465.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147619859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A nondogmatic approach to boldness: Reply to Athar et al. (2026). 一种非教条的大胆方法:回复Athar等人(2026)。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001464
David K Marcus,M Brent Donnellan,John F Edens
{"title":"A nondogmatic approach to boldness: Reply to Athar et al. (2026).","authors":"David K Marcus,M Brent Donnellan,John F Edens","doi":"10.1037/pas0001464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001464","url":null,"abstract":"Athar et al. (see record 2027-45295-001) offer a critique of the Psychopathic Boldness Scale (see record 2025-96918-001), highlighting what they argue are both conceptual and empirical limitations of this new operationalization of the triarchic model's construct of boldness. In this reply, we demonstrate that their theoretical claims are based on a mischaracterization of the triarchic model, in which they purport that boldness should be orthogonal to the triarchic construct of meanness. We also provide additional empirical analyses suggesting that Athar et al. are incorrect in their characterization of the extent to which the correlates of the Psychopathic Boldness Scale initially described by Marcus et al. (2025) suggest that it is a de facto operationalization of meanness (rather than boldness). We conclude with suggestions for additional research with the Psychopathic Boldness Scale that would better inform our understanding of the nomological network of this new scale, such as examining correlations with constructs associated with narcissism and with psychophysiological measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"13 1","pages":"339-342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.'s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct. 从争议到困惑:Marcus等人(2025)的精神病态大胆度量表如何进一步混淆了大胆度的概念。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001442
Mojtaba Elhami Athar,Joshua D Miller,Donald R Lynam
{"title":"From controversy to confusion: A commentary on how Marcus et al.'s (2025) Psychopathic Boldness Scale further muddies the boldness construct.","authors":"Mojtaba Elhami Athar,Joshua D Miller,Donald R Lynam","doi":"10.1037/pas0001442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001442","url":null,"abstract":"The Psychopathic Boldness Scale (see record 2025-96918-001) is a newly developed 21-item self-report measure intended to assess boldness as it manifests within psychopathy. In this commentary, we raise concerns about the PBS's construct validity, particularly its conceptual and empirical overlap with antagonism-related traits. Drawing on theoretical analysis and results from Marcus et al., we evaluated how PBS items function relative to the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure. Intraclass correlations of overall correlational profiles revealed that the nomological network of the PBS more closely aligns with Triarchic Psychopathy Measure meanness than with boldness. Rather than clarifying the role of boldness within psychopathy, the PBS repackages maladaptive content typically captured by meanness/antagonism under the boldness label and results in a case of the jingle fallacy. We argue that this conflation undermines theoretical precision and sets the stage for a more difficult-to-integrate literature. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"16 1","pages":"332-338"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reliable and clinically significant change in Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) scores among high-risk psychiatric outpatients. 自杀认知量表-修订(SCS-R)评分在高危精神科门诊患者中发生可靠且具有临床意义的变化。
IF 3.1 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-26 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001456
Craig J Bryan, Christina Rose Bauder, Jaryd Hiser, M David Rudd, Justin C Baker
{"title":"Reliable and clinically significant change in Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised (SCS-R) scores among high-risk psychiatric outpatients.","authors":"Craig J Bryan, Christina Rose Bauder, Jaryd Hiser, M David Rudd, Justin C Baker","doi":"10.1037/pas0001456","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001456","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A key challenge for clinical practitioners is the lack of assessment methods that can be used to determine if a high-risk patient has experienced meaningful reductions in suicide risk. The Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised has been shown to differentiate patients who will attempt suicide, but its utility for monitoring treatment response remains unknown. We used data from three independent samples, including two samples of psychiatric outpatients reporting recent suicidal ideation and/or behaviors (Study 1, <i>n</i> = 96; Study 2, <i>n</i> = 44) and one primary care sample (Study 3, <i>n</i> = 2,744) to calculate the reliable change index and clinically significant change thresholds for the Suicide Cognitions Scale-Revised. In both Studies 1 and 2, change scores ≥20 indicated reliable change, and total scores ≤21 indicated patients were more likely to belong to the nonsuicidal population than the suicidal population. Participants meeting clinically significant change criteria had significantly lower suicide attempt rates in Studies 1 and 3 and reported significantly better social-occupational functioning in Studies 1 and 2. Results suggest the clinically significant change threshold is a useful marker of reduced suicide risk among high-risk patients. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"343-349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146053432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Further validation of the MMPI-3 personality disorder syndrome scales in a community mental health sample. MMPI-3型人格障碍综合征量表在社区精神健康样本中的进一步验证。
IF 3.1 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-08 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001448
Janelle M Tinker, Martin Sellbom
{"title":"Further validation of the MMPI-3 personality disorder syndrome scales in a community mental health sample.","authors":"Janelle M Tinker, Martin Sellbom","doi":"10.1037/pas0001448","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001448","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the present study was to replicate and extend research on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) Personality Disorder (PD) Syndrome scales. A total of 289 participants were recruited from the community in Dunedin, New Zealand-all of whom were engaged in mental health treatment. We evaluated the validity of the PD Syndrome scales against various measures of traditional PDs, personality traits, and personality dysfunction using self-report, clinical-rating, and informant-report criteria. The findings provide support for the criterion validity of the MMPI-3 PD scales, as most scales demonstrated strong and meaningful correlations with their corresponding latent PD factors, with the exception of the Schizotypal PD scale. Convergent validity was also supported, with most scales positively correlating with personality impairment and aligning with expected maladaptive personality trait domains. Discriminant validity was generally supported; however, several scales also showed notable correlations with nontarget PD factors and nonhypothesized trait domains, some of which were larger than the correlations with their intended target constructs. Overall, the MMPI-3 PD Syndrome scales can assist clinicians with generating diagnostic hypotheses about traditional PDs, which will ultimately enhance clinical understanding and outcomes for patients during the transition to dimensional frameworks. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"283-294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145934275","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The distracted participant? Experience sampling response behavior and participant disturbance in social situations. 分心的参与者?体验社会情境中的抽样反应行为和参与者干扰。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-23 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001463
Gudrun Eisele,Robin Achterhof,Aleksandra M Lachowicz,Joana De Calheiros Velozo,Thomas Vaessen,Lisa Peeters,Inez Myin-Germeys
{"title":"The distracted participant? Experience sampling response behavior and participant disturbance in social situations.","authors":"Gudrun Eisele,Robin Achterhof,Aleksandra M Lachowicz,Joana De Calheiros Velozo,Thomas Vaessen,Lisa Peeters,Inez Myin-Germeys","doi":"10.1037/pas0001463","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001463","url":null,"abstract":"Clinical assessment using self-reports hinges on the assumption that participants pay sufficient attention to questionnaires to provide valid data. This assumption is particularly tenuous in experience sampling method studies, where participants complete questionnaires in daily life across a range of potentially distracting situations. Previous research suggests that participants may be particularly distracted when responding to experience sampling method questionnaires in social situations, especially when engaging in social interactions. Yet, the effects of these environmental distractions on response behavior and, consequently, data quality remain poorly understood. We investigated the effects of distracting environments on disturbance and response behavior across various social and nonsocial situations. Experience sampling method data from three young adult samples (combined N = 293) and a general population youth sample (N = 1,903) were analyzed with multilevel (logistic) regressions. In line with previous research, adults were significantly more disturbed by assessments when in company compared to when alone, especially when also interacting with their company. In addition, we found significant differences in response behavior between social settings in adults, with changes pointing toward lower data quality when in company. Interestingly, patterns were different, in some cases even reversed, in school-going adolescents. While our findings suggest that the distraction of social settings affects participant burden and response behavior, the influence on data quality seemed minor. Differences across samples suggest that the setting of the social experience needs to be considered. Preparing participants for sampling in distracting (social) environments may help safeguard data quality and reduce participant burden in ambulatory clinical assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147495253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across age groups in a German representative sample: An application of confirmatory factor analysis using k-fold cross-validation. 德国代表性样本的优势和困难问卷(SDQ)在不同年龄组的测量不变性:使用k-fold交叉验证的验证性因子分析的应用
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001446
Claudia Lazarides, Claudia Niessner, Simon Kolb, Jannik H. Orzek, Alexander Woll, Stephen G. West, Manuel C. Voelkle
{"title":"Measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across age groups in a German representative sample: An application of confirmatory factor analysis using k-fold cross-validation.","authors":"Claudia Lazarides, Claudia Niessner, Simon Kolb, Jannik H. Orzek, Alexander Woll, Stephen G. West, Manuel C. Voelkle","doi":"10.1037/pas0001446","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001446","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147380532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The development and psychometric validation of the Assessment of Sexual Behavior–Child version (ASB-C). 儿童性行为评估量表(ASB-C)的编制与心理计量学验证。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001461
Brian Allen, Jane F. Silovsky, David J. Kolko, Lucy Berliner, Rachel Wamser
{"title":"The development and psychometric validation of the Assessment of Sexual Behavior–Child version (ASB-C).","authors":"Brian Allen, Jane F. Silovsky, David J. Kolko, Lucy Berliner, Rachel Wamser","doi":"10.1037/pas0001461","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001461","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147380923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书