Psychological Assessment最新文献_第9页

Taking measurement-based care to school: Evaluating teacher-report versions of the behavior and feelings survey and the top problems assessment. 以测量为基础的学校关怀：评价教师报告版本的行为和感受调查和首要问题评估。

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001447

Spencer C. Evans, Ashley R. Karlovich, Katherine A. Corteselli, Amanda Jensen-Doss, John R. Weisz

引用次数: 0

Measuring parenting interactions in resource-constrained settings: Evidence from an observational tool implemented in Andean Peru. 衡量资源受限环境下的父母互动：来自秘鲁安第斯地区实施的观察工具的证据。

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001462

Dana Charles McCoy, Marta Dormal, Kristen Hinckley, Milagros Alvarado, Lena Jäggi, Daniel Mäusezahl, Stella Maria Hartinger, Günther Fink

引用次数: 0

Do the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Beck Hopelessness Scale reliably capture systematic change and within-person variation? Evidence from generalizability theory. 贝克抑郁量表- ii和贝克绝望量表是否可靠地捕捉到系统变化和个人变异？来自概括性理论的证据。

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-09 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001457

Sofie Glatt, Ashley L. Greene, Chi C. Chan, Gregory K. Brown, Marianne Goodman

引用次数: 0

Estimating the impact of missed cases on the accuracy of autism screening tools. 估计漏诊病例对自闭症筛查工具准确性的影响。

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001445

Brian Barger,Terri Deocampo Pigott,R Christopher Sheldrick,Jonathan Campbell,Alexa Gonzalez Laca,Jon Starnes,Betsy Davis,Rachel Waford,John Olmstead

{"title":"Estimating the impact of missed cases on the accuracy of autism screening tools.","authors":"Brian Barger,Terri Deocampo Pigott,R Christopher Sheldrick,Jonathan Campbell,Alexa Gonzalez Laca,Jon Starnes,Betsy Davis,Rachel Waford,John Olmstead","doi":"10.1037/pas0001445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001445","url":null,"abstract":"A common problem for assessing psychiatric screening tools is that initial diagnostic accuracy estimates are conducted on cross-sectional data and later found to be lower than expected when longitudinal analyses are conducted. This article uses prevalence estimates to identify potentially missed cases and adjust diagnostic accuracy metrics. To display this approach, we meta-analyze and assess 27 population-level autism screening studies identified via an umbrella review and contrast four population adjustments (none, national, U.S.-centric, and world prevalence). Studies with no positive screen adjustments displayed adequate sensitivity (.75), but poor sensitivity resulted when applying national (.52), world (.50), and U.S.-centric (.33) population adjustments. We also address missing positive screen cases due to the common problem of attrition (Sheldrick et al., 2023). Positive screen adjustments suggested a range of sensitivity impacts ranging from very poor (.32) to good (.89). Across analyses, positive predictive value estimates also ranged from .20 to .73 depending on population and missed case assumptions. The strengths and benefits of blending epidemiology and psychometric perspectives to identify screening tools that are weaker than expected are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147359397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Measuring Parenting Interactions in Resource-Constrained Settings: Evidence From an Observational Tool Implemented in Andean Peru 在资源受限环境下衡量父母互动的补充材料：来自安第斯秘鲁实施的观察工具的证据

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001462.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Taking Measurement-Based Care to School: Evaluating Teacher-Report Versions of the Behavior and Feelings Survey and the Top Problems Assessment 以测量为基础的学校关怀补充材料：评价教师报告版本的行为与感受调查和首要问题评估

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001447.supp

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for The Distracted Participant? Experience Sampling Response Behavior and Participant Disturbance in Social Situations 分心参与者的补充材料？社会情境中的经验抽样反应行为与参与者干扰

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001463.supp

引用次数: 0

Differential item functioning of PROMIS Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8a across levels of health literacy in a community sample of adults. 社区成人样本中PROMIS睡眠障碍-短表8a在健康素养水平上的差异项目功能

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001449

Rowida Mohamed,Michael K Paasche-Orlow,Eloisa Serrano,Melissa Marquez,Lori Henault,Claire Weaver,Noël C Slesinger Roy,Francesca R Farina,Emily Hurstak,Michelle Taddeo,Katherina Hauner,James W Griffith

{"title":"Differential item functioning of PROMIS Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8a across levels of health literacy in a community sample of adults.","authors":"Rowida Mohamed,Michael K Paasche-Orlow,Eloisa Serrano,Melissa Marquez,Lori Henault,Claire Weaver,Noël C Slesinger Roy,Francesca R Farina,Emily Hurstak,Michelle Taddeo,Katherina Hauner,James W Griffith","doi":"10.1037/pas0001449","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001449","url":null,"abstract":"Limited health literacy may contribute to systematic bias in health assessments relying on self-report. The present study aimed to examine how varying levels of health literacy might affect scores on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8a, a commonly used tool to assess self-reported perceptions of sleep quality. A community-based sample of adults (≥18 years) from Boston and Chicago was included in the study. Health literacy was measured using the Health Literacy Assessment Using Talking Touchscreen Technology (Health LiTT). We conducted a differential item functioning analysis using an ordinal logistic regression and a graded response model. Monte Carlo simulations were employed to establish effect size thresholds. We analyzed data from 702 participants, with a mean age of 49.1 ± 15.6 years. The sample included 61.5% females, 41.6% Black participants, and 27.8% Hispanic participants, with 58% demonstrating low health literacy. Participants in the low health literacy group reported higher sleep disturbance levels compared to those in the adequate health literacy group. Four of the eight items on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8a scale exhibited statistically significant differential item functioning by health literacy, indicating that individuals with varying levels of health literacy interpret or respond to these items differently, even when they have the same underlying sleep disturbance level. The overall impact of differential item functioning on total scores, however, was negligible. The psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance-Short Form 8a support its use across populations with varying levels of health literacy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147359398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Supplemental Material for Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Across Age Groups in a German Representative Sample: An Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Using k-Fold Cross-Validation 德国代表性样本中各年龄组优势和困难问卷（SDQ）测量不变性的补充材料：使用k-Fold交叉验证的验证性因子分析的应用

IF 3.6 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-05 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001446.supp

引用次数: 0

Proclaiming a psychological assessment tool is "reliable, valid, and ethical" doth not make it so: A reply to Stein et al. (2026) and Jenkins (2026). 宣称一种心理评估工具是“可靠的、有效的和合乎道德的”并不能使它成为事实：对Stein等人（2026）和Jenkins（2026）的回复。

IF 3.1 2区心理学

Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001451

Samuel Justin Sinclair, Greg Haggerty, Kiefer D Cowie, Kelly E Shea, Kris L Shea

{"title":"Proclaiming a psychological assessment tool is \"reliable, valid, and ethical\" doth not make it so: A reply to Stein et al. (2026) and Jenkins (2026).","authors":"Samuel Justin Sinclair, Greg Haggerty, Kiefer D Cowie, Kelly E Shea, Kris L Shea","doi":"10.1037/pas0001451","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001451","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We thank Stein et al. (2026) and Jenkins (2026) for their commentaries on our critical review of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale-Global system as applied to the Thematic Apperception Test (Sinclair et al., 2023) and appreciate the opportunity to respond in kind. Although we acknowledge the considerable effort put into these response articles (analytically and conceptually), both fall short in addressing the myriad serious methodological and procedural concerns we raised in 2023 and do little to move the needle in support of this assessment technique. This article will review the many ways these responses misinterpret and misrepresent our original review and the voluminous methodological problems with the \"meta-analyses\" that are presented by Stein et al.-and the various ways they are statistically confounded, confusing, and scientifically unsound. Further, this article will highlight the considerable number of logical inconsistencies that are inherent within Stein et al.'s core arguments, as well as the numerous contradictions between Stein et al. and Jenkins-all of which seriously undermine the methodology itself. Given the many ethical ambiguities that arise as a result, we conclude with a repeat calling for a moratorium on this methodology until these issues are sufficiently resolved. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"38 3","pages":"253-265"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146165962","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0