Psychological Assessment最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach. 新冠肺炎恐惧量表:一种元分析结构方程建模方法。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001276
Desirée Blázquez-Rincón, Raimundo Aguayo-Estremera, Zainab Alimoradi, Elahe Jafari, Amir H Pakpour
{"title":"The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach.","authors":"Desirée Blázquez-Rincón,&nbsp;Raimundo Aguayo-Estremera,&nbsp;Zainab Alimoradi,&nbsp;Elahe Jafari,&nbsp;Amir H Pakpour","doi":"10.1037/pas0001276","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001276","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The widespread administration and multiple validations of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) in different languages have highlighted the controversy over its underlying structure and the resulting reliability index. In the present study, a meta-analysis based on structural equation modeling (MASEM) was conducted to assess the internal structure of the seven-item, 5-point Likert-type FCV-19S version, estimate an overall reliability index from the underlying model that best reflected the internal structure (one τ-equivalent factor, one congeneric factor, or two-factor models), and perform moderator analyses for the model-implied interitem correlations and estimated factor loadings. A Pearson interitem correlation matrix was obtained for 48 independent studies, from which a pooled matrix was calculated following a random-effects multivariate meta-analysis. The results from the one-stage MASEM analysis showed that the two-factor model properly fitted the pooled matrix, while the τ-equivalent and congeneric one-factor models did not. Even though, the use of a bifactor model exhibited the predominance of the general factor over the domain-specific ones. High omega coefficients were obtained for the entire scale (.91) and the psychological (.83) and physiological (.83) symptoms subscales. Moderator analyses evidenced an increase in the estimated factor loadings, as well as in the reliability of the FCV-19S, when the standard deviation of the total scores increased and when the FCV-19S was administered to specific (vs. general) populations. The FCV-19S can be therefore considered as a highly related two-factor scale whose reliability makes it suitable for applied and research purposes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 11","pages":"1030-1040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71413605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Intervening on High-Risk Responses During Ecological Momentary Assessment of Suicidal Thoughts: Is There an Effect on Study Data? 在自杀念头的生态瞬时评估中干预高风险反应的补充材料:对研究数据有影响吗?
2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001288.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Intervening on High-Risk Responses During Ecological Momentary Assessment of Suicidal Thoughts: Is There an Effect on Study Data?","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001288.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001288.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134907886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Exploring the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-3 in a Transgender and Gender Diverse Sample 探索明尼苏达多相人格量表(MMPI)-3在跨性别和性别多样化样本中的补充材料
2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-26 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001287.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Exploring the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-3 in a Transgender and Gender Diverse Sample","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001287.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001287.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134906833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Assessment of Psychopathy Among Justice-Involved Adult Males With Low Versus Average Intelligence: Differential Links to Violent Offending 低智力与平均智力参与司法的成年男性的精神病评估补充材料:与暴力犯罪的不同联系
2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001286.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Assessment of Psychopathy Among Justice-Involved Adult Males With Low Versus Average Intelligence: Differential Links to Violent Offending","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001286.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001286.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136077430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental Material for Validation of a Measure of Hypervigilance and Anxiety About Gastrointestinal Symptoms for Individuals With Elevated Eating Pathology 对饮食病理升高的个体的胃肠道症状进行高度警惕和焦虑测量的验证补充材料
2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001280.supp
{"title":"Supplemental Material for Validation of a Measure of Hypervigilance and Anxiety About Gastrointestinal Symptoms for Individuals With Elevated Eating Pathology","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001280.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001280.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"166 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135968427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recovery after a suicidal episode: Developing and validating the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST). 自杀事件后的康复:开发和验证康复评估和自杀支持工具(RESST)。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001269
Yosef Sokol, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Chayim Rosensweig, Chana Silver, Shifra Hubner, Louis Primavera, Marianne Goodman
{"title":"Recovery after a suicidal episode: Developing and validating the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST).","authors":"Yosef Sokol, Sofie Glatt, Chynna Levin, Patricia Tran, Chayim Rosensweig, Chana Silver, Shifra Hubner, Louis Primavera, Marianne Goodman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001269","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001269","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The personal recovery movement advocates for shifting emphasis from clinical symptom reduction toward reclaiming personal agency and creating meaning-filled lives despite the presence of distressing experiences. Corresponding personal recovery measures have been developed; however, there is no established psychometric assessment of personal recovery following a suicidal episode. This study addressed this gap by developing the Recovery Evaluation and Suicide Support Tool (RESST) and assessing its test score reliability, test score interpretations' validity, and psychometric properties. Throughout RESST's development, input from diverse stakeholders-including clinicians, researchers, and individuals with lived experience-was gathered to ensure a meaningful and useful scale. Exploratory factor analysis techniques were used with adults with a suicidal episode history (<i>N</i> = 502) to select and refine items, culminating in a 21-item scale with four distinct subscales: Self-Worth, Life Worth, Social Worth, and Self-Understanding. Confirmatory factor analysis techniques demonstrated model fit across three samples of adults with a suicidal episode history (combined <i>N</i> = 1,523), and test-retest reliability was obtained (<i>N</i> = 204). The results revealed that RESST scores exhibit an internally consistent and replicable factor structure, consistent with personal recovery theory. Additionally, the interpretation of test scores exhibited both convergent and discriminant validity. Mental health indices related to recovery, negative mood states, suicidality, and meaning in life had significant moderate-to-strong correlations with the RESST, supporting the validity of the test score interpretations and clinical relevance. This measure should aid research into recovery processes and understanding how recovery following a suicidal episode may be enhanced clinically and personally. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 10","pages":"842-855"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41148272","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement invariance of the Youth Self-Report across youth who have committed sexual and nonsexual offenses. 青年自我报告在性犯罪和非性犯罪青年中的测量不变性。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001266
Elisabeth J Leroux, Jala Rizeq, Tracey A Skilling
{"title":"Measurement invariance of the Youth Self-Report across youth who have committed sexual and nonsexual offenses.","authors":"Elisabeth J Leroux, Jala Rizeq, Tracey A Skilling","doi":"10.1037/pas0001266","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001266","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Justice-involved youth experience high rates of mental health problems that require proper screening and assessment in order to effectively intervene. The Youth Self-Report (YSR) is a general psychopathology rating scale that measures several dimensions of psychopathology and is commonly used in clinical assessments, including with justice-involved youth. Yet, the underlying factor structure of the YSR has not been examined specifically in a sample of justice-involved youth. We examined the factor structure of the YSR using confirmatory factor analysis with a sample of 961 male youth involved with the justice system (12-18 years of age). Measurement invariance of the YSR was also examined across groups of youth who committed a sexual offence and those who committed a nonsexual offence. The eight-factor model presented with optimal fit to the data, consistent with previous research with nonjustice involved samples, and the model demonstrated strong measurement invariance across youth who committed both types of offenses (sexual and nonsexual). Youth who committed nonsexual offenses reported significantly higher degrees of rule-breaking behavior and lower degrees of social problems than youth who committed sexual offenses. The current findings provide strong psychometric evidence that supports the use of the YSR with justice-involved male youth. As such, clinicians and researchers can be confident in using the YSR as a mental health screening tool with male youth involved with the justice system who have committed various offenses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 10","pages":"821-829"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41165318","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The ecological validity of the IOP-29: A follow-up study using the MMPI-2-RF and the SIMS as criterion variables. IOP-29的生态有效性:使用MMPI-2-RF和SIMS作为标准变量的随访研究。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-31 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001273
Paolo Roma, Luciano Giromini, Martin Sellbom, Alessandra Cardinale, Stefano Ferracuti, Cristina Mazza
{"title":"The ecological validity of the IOP-29: A follow-up study using the MMPI-2-RF and the SIMS as criterion variables.","authors":"Paolo Roma, Luciano Giromini, Martin Sellbom, Alessandra Cardinale, Stefano Ferracuti, Cristina Mazza","doi":"10.1037/pas0001273","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001273","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current guidelines for conducting symptom validity assessments require that professionals administer multiple symptom validity tests (SVTs) and that the SVTs selected for their evaluations provide nonredundant information. However, not many SVTs are currently available, and most of them rely on the same, (in)frequency-based, feigning detection strategy. In this context, the Inventory of Problems (IOP-29) could be a valuable addition to the assessor's toolbox because of its brevity (29 items) and its different approach to assessing the credibility of presented symptoms. As its ecological validity has been poorly investigated, the present study used a criterion groups design to examine the classification accuracy of the IOP-29 in a data set of 174 court-ordered psychological evaluations focused on psychological injury. The validity scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form and the total score of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptoms were used as criterion variables. Overall, the results of this study confirm that the IOP-29 is an effective measure (1.70 ≤ <i>d</i> ≤ 2.67) that provides valuable information when added to the multimethod assessment of symptom validity in civil forensic contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"868-879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10178013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measurement invariance and response consistency of single-item assessments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. 自杀想法和行为单项评估的测量不变性和反应一致性。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-04 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001268
Kenneth McClure, Kerri-Anne Bell, Ross Jacobucci, Brooke A Ammerman
{"title":"Measurement invariance and response consistency of single-item assessments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors.","authors":"Kenneth McClure, Kerri-Anne Bell, Ross Jacobucci, Brooke A Ammerman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001268","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001268","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aimed to expand the literature on single-item assessments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) by examining measurement invariance of commonly used single-item assessments of suicidal ideation (SI), planning (SP), and attempts (SA) with respect to race and ethnicity. Predictive invariance with respect to depression, and multi-item measures of passive and active SI were also explored. Measurement invariance was examined across (a) Black and White respondents and (b) Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic/-Latinx respondents. Participants (<i>N</i> = 1,624; 51.66% male) were recruited from Mechanical Turk and Prime Panels. Participants were administered four distinct single-item measures each for SI, SP, and SA across three timeframes (past month, past year, lifetime). Items were drawn from well-known large-scale studies (e.g., National Comorbidity Survey) and common suicide risk assessments. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine measurement invariance; regression with group by measure interactions were used to evaluate predictive invariance. Measurement invariance was observed for both Black (<i>N</i> = 534) and White (<i>N</i> = 1,089) respondents as well as Hispanic/Latinx (<i>N</i> = 335) and non-Hispanic/-Latinx (<i>N</i> = 1,288) respondents across single-item outcomes. Thus, SI, SP, and SA rates can be defensibly compared between Black and White and Hispanic/Latinx and non-Hispanic/-Latinx respondents within studies; however, comparison of SI and SP rates across studies with differing assessment prompts should be met with caution. Multiple single-item STB measures demonstrated predictive bias across race and ethnicity suggesting potential differential screening capabilities. Elevated SI, SP, and SA rates for Hispanic/Latinx individuals were also observed. Findings reiterate the importance of minor language differences in single-item STB assessments. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"830-841"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10146071","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A proof of concept study of promotive, mixed, and risk effects using the SAVRY assessment tool items with youth with sexual offenses. 使用SAVRY评估工具对青少年性犯罪的促进、混合和风险影响进行概念验证研究。
IF 3.6 2区 心理学
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-21 DOI: 10.1037/pas0001272
Calvin M Langton, Jennifer A Ranjit, James R Worling
{"title":"A proof of concept study of promotive, mixed, and risk effects using the SAVRY assessment tool items with youth with sexual offenses.","authors":"Calvin M Langton, Jennifer A Ranjit, James R Worling","doi":"10.1037/pas0001272","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001272","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is currently a lack of consensus about the nature of strengths in forensic assessments. With 273 justice-involved male youth and a fixed 3-year follow-up, this study adopted the approach of Farrington and colleagues to investigating the nature of associations between trichotomized variables, representing risks and strengths, and outcomes using pairs of odds ratios (<i>OR</i>s) and percentage point changes from base rates. Items from the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), a structured professional judgment tool used to assess risk and protective factors in justice-involved youth, were employed for this purpose. In the literature, the accuracy of SAVRY summed totals for its Risk Factor item sets (each item rated using a trichotomy) has been generally in the moderate range in predicting future violence. But the total for its summed Protective Factor items (each rated using a dichotomy) has been less consistently encouraging. In this study, contrary to their labels, the majority of SAVRY Risk and Protective Factors (rated using trichotomies) exerted a risk effect at one end of their trichotomy (risk item ratings of 2, protective item ratings of 0) and a promotive effect at the other end (risk item ratings of 0, protective factor ratings of 2) for a new violent (including sexual) offense and any new offense. Subsets of items conservatively weighted using <i>OR</i>s (capturing risk <i>and</i> strength) were statistically significantly more accurate in predicting outcomes than their originally rated counterpart subsets. Implications for understanding the nature of strengths and for applied assessment practices are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"856-867"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10034611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信