Psychological Assessment最新文献

{"title":"Machine learning and deep learning systems for automated measurement of \"advanced\" theory of mind: Reliability and validity in children and adolescents.","authors":"Rory T Devine,&nbsp;Venelin Kovatchev,&nbsp;Imogen Grumley Traynor,&nbsp;Phillip Smith,&nbsp;Mark Lee","doi":"10.1037/pas0001186","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001186","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding individual differences in theory of mind (ToM; the ability to attribute mental states to others) in middle childhood and adolescence hinges on the availability of robust and scalable measures. Open-ended response tasks yield valid indicators of ToM but are labor intensive and difficult to compare across studies. We examined the reliability and validity of new machine learning and deep learning neural network automated scoring systems for measuring ToM in children and adolescents. Two large samples of British children and adolescents aged between 7 and 13 years (Sample 1: N = 1,135, Mage = 10.22 years, SD = 1.45; Sample 2: N = 1,020, Mage = 10.36 years, SD = 1.27) completed the silent film and strange stories tasks. Teachers rated Sample 2 children's social competence with peers. A single latent-factor explained variation in performance on both the silent film and strange stories task (in Sample 1 and 2) and test performance was sensitive to age-related differences and individual differences within each age-group. A deep learning neural network automated scoring system trained on Sample 1 exhibited interrater reliability and measurement invariance with manual ratings in Sample 2. Validity of ratings from the automated scoring system was supported by unique positive associations between ToM and teacher-rated social competence. The results demonstrate that reliable and valid measures of ToM can be obtained using the new freely available deep learning neural network automated scoring system to rate open-ended text responses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"165-177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9411470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI): Psychometric evaluation in veteran men and women with trauma exposure.","authors":"Kelsey N Serier, Rachel L Zelkowitz, Brian N Smith, Dawne Vogt, Karen S Mitchell","doi":"10.1037/pas0001190","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI) is a self-report measure of negative posttraumatic cognitions, which is an important construct in the development and maintenance of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Evidence for the most appropriate PTCI item and factor structure is mixed, and this measure has not been extensively studied in veterans. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the PTCI in two national samples of veteran men and women. Participants in Sample 1 (veterans from all service eras) and Sample 2 (recently separated veterans) completed the PTCI and additional measures of mental health symptoms. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a brief version of the PTCI (PTCI-9; 3-factor, nine-item) was a superior fit relative to other examined factor structures. Consistent with the original conceptualization of the measure, these factors were labeled: Negative cognitions about self, negative cognitions about the world, and self-blame. Scores on the PTCI-9 were differentially associated with the PTSD symptom clusters and with scores on self-report measures of external comorbidities. PTCI-9 scores were higher among individuals with trauma exposure and with a probable PTSD diagnosis. There was evidence of full (Sample 1) and partial (Sample 2) scalar invariance across men and women. Overall, the present study supports the use of the PTCI-9 as a measure of negative cognitions; however, scores may not be specific to PTSD and may represent a global negative thinking style. Even so, the PTCI-9 appears to be a suitable and abbreviated measure that could be used with veterans in research and clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"140-151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10167943/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9434305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Participation and compliance in a 6-month daily diary study among individuals at risk for mental health problems.","authors":"Marieke J Schreuder,&nbsp;Robin N Groen,&nbsp;Johanna T W Wigman,&nbsp;Marieke Wichers,&nbsp;Catharina A Hartman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001197","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intensive longitudinal (IL) measurement, which involves prolonged self-monitoring, may have important clinical applications but is also burdening. This raises the question who takes part in and successfully completes IL measurements. This preregistered study investigated which demographic, personality, economic, social, psychological, or physical participant characteristics are associated with participation and compliance in an IL study conducted in young adults at enhanced risk for psychopathology. Dutch young adults enrolled in the clinical cohort of the TRacking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS) were invited to a 6-month daily diary study. Participant characteristics came from five earlier TRAILS assessment waves collected from Age 11 onwards. To evaluate participation, we compared diary study participants (<i>N</i> = 134) to nonparticipants (<i>N</i> = 309) and a sex-matched subsample (<i>N</i> = 1926) of individuals from the general population cohort of TRAILS. To evaluate compliance, we analyzed which characteristics were related to the proportion of completed diary entries. We found that participants (23.6 ± 0.7 years old; 57% male) were largely similar to nonparticipants. In addition, compared to the general population, participants reported more negative scores on nearly all characteristics. Internalizing problems predicted higher compliance. Externalizing problems, antisocial behavior, and daily smoking predicted lower compliance. Thus, in at-risk young adults, who scored lower on nearly every positive characteristic and higher on every negative characteristic relative to the general population, participation in a diary study is unbiased. Small biases in compliance occur, of which researchers should be aware. IL measurement is thus suitable in at-risk populations, which is a requirement for its usefulness in clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"115-126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9359852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of the 7-item HADS Depression subscale and 14-item total HADS for screening for major depression: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.","authors":"Yin Wu,&nbsp;Brooke Levis,&nbsp;Federico M Daray,&nbsp;John P A Ioannidis,&nbsp;Scott B Patten,&nbsp;Pim Cuijpers,&nbsp;Roy C Ziegelstein,&nbsp;Simon Gilbody,&nbsp;Felix H Fischer,&nbsp;Suiqiong Fan,&nbsp;Ying Sun,&nbsp;Chen He,&nbsp;Ankur Krishnan,&nbsp;Dipika Neupane,&nbsp;Parash Mani Bhandari,&nbsp;Zelalem Negeri,&nbsp;Kira E Riehm,&nbsp;Danielle B Rice,&nbsp;Marleine Azar,&nbsp;Xin Wei Yan,&nbsp;Mahrukh Imran,&nbsp;Matthew J Chiovitti,&nbsp;Jill T Boruff,&nbsp;Dean McMillan,&nbsp;Lorie A Kloda,&nbsp;Sarah Markham,&nbsp;Melissa Henry,&nbsp;Zahinoor Ismail,&nbsp;Carmen G Loiselle,&nbsp;Nicholas D Mitchell,&nbsp;Samir Al-Adawi,&nbsp;Kevin R Beck,&nbsp;Anna Beraldi,&nbsp;Charles N Bernstein,&nbsp;Birgitte Boye,&nbsp;Natalie Büel-Drabe,&nbsp;Adomas Bunevicius,&nbsp;Ceyhun Can,&nbsp;Gregory Carter,&nbsp;Chih-Ken Chen,&nbsp;Gary Cheung,&nbsp;Kerrie Clover,&nbsp;Ronán M Conroy,&nbsp;Gema Costa-Requena,&nbsp;Daniel Cukor,&nbsp;Eli Dabscheck,&nbsp;Jennifer De Souza,&nbsp;Marina Downing,&nbsp;Anthony Feinstein,&nbsp;Panagiotis P Ferentinos,&nbsp;Alastair J Flint,&nbsp;Pamela Gallagher,&nbsp;Milena Gandy,&nbsp;Luigi Grassi,&nbsp;Martin Härter,&nbsp;Asuncion Hernando,&nbsp;Melinda L Jackson,&nbsp;Josef Jenewein,&nbsp;Nathalie Jetté,&nbsp;Miguel Julião,&nbsp;Marie Kjærgaard,&nbsp;Sebastian Köhler,&nbsp;Hans-Helmut König,&nbsp;Lalit K R Krishna,&nbsp;Yu Lee,&nbsp;Margrit Löbner,&nbsp;Wim L Loosman,&nbsp;Anthony W Love,&nbsp;Bernd Löwe,&nbsp;Ulrik F Malt,&nbsp;Ruth Ann Marrie,&nbsp;Loreto Massardo,&nbsp;Yutaka Matsuoka,&nbsp;Anja Mehnert,&nbsp;Ioannis Michopoulos,&nbsp;Laurent Misery,&nbsp;Christian J Nelson,&nbsp;Chong Guan Ng,&nbsp;Meaghan L O'Donnell,&nbsp;Suzanne J O'Rourke,&nbsp;Ahmet Öztürk,&nbsp;Alexander Pabst,&nbsp;Julie A Pasco,&nbsp;Jurate Peceliuniene,&nbsp;Luis Pintor,&nbsp;Jennie L Ponsford,&nbsp;Federico Pulido,&nbsp;Terence J Quinn,&nbsp;Silje E Reme,&nbsp;Katrin Reuter,&nbsp;Steffi G Riedel-Heller,&nbsp;Alasdair G Rooney,&nbsp;Roberto Sánchez-González,&nbsp;Rebecca M Saracino,&nbsp;Melanie P J Schellekens,&nbsp;Martin Scherer,&nbsp;Andrea Benedetti,&nbsp;Brett D Thombs,&nbsp;Et Al","doi":"10.1037/pas0001181","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001181","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The seven-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression subscale (HADS-D) and the total score of the 14-item HADS (HADS-T) are both used for major depression screening. Compared to the HADS-D, the HADS-T includes anxiety items and requires more time to complete. We compared the screening accuracy of the HADS-D and HADS-T for major depression detection. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis and fit bivariate random effects models to assess diagnostic accuracy among participants with both HADS-D and HADS-T scores. We identified optimal cutoffs, estimated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals, and compared screening accuracy across paired cutoffs via two-stage and individual-level models. We used a 0.05 equivalence margin to assess equivalency in sensitivity and specificity. 20,700 participants (2,285 major depression cases) from 98 studies were included. Cutoffs of ≥7 for the HADS-D (sensitivity 0.79 [0.75, 0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.75, 0.80]) and ≥15 for the HADS-T (sensitivity 0.79 [0.76, 0.82], specificity 0.81 [0.78, 0.83]) minimized the distance to the top-left corner of the receiver operating characteristic curve. Across all sets of paired cutoffs evaluated, differences of sensitivity between HADS-T and HADS-D ranged from -0.05 to 0.01 (0.00 at paired optimal cutoffs), and differences of specificity were within 0.03 for all cutoffs (0.02-0.03). The pattern was similar among outpatients, although the HADS-T was slightly (not nonequivalently) more specific among inpatients. The accuracy of HADS-T was equivalent to the HADS-D for detecting major depression. In most settings, the shorter HADS-D would be preferred. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"95-114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10009852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A comparison of the predictive accuracy of structured and unstructured risk assessment methods for the prediction of recidivism in individuals convicted of sexual and violent offense.","authors":"Maximilian Wertz,&nbsp;Susanne Schobel,&nbsp;Kolja Schiltz,&nbsp;Martin Rettenberger","doi":"10.1037/pas0001192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the most commonly replicated results in the research area of recidivism risk assessment is the superiority of structured and standardized prediction methods in comparison to unstructured, subjective, intuitive, or impressionistic clinical judgments. However, the quality of evidence supporting this conclusion is partly still controversially discussed because studies including direct comparisons of the predictive accuracy of unstructured and structured risk assessment methods have been relatively rarely conducted. Therefore, we examined in the present study retrospectively <i>N</i> = 416 expert witness reports written about individuals convicted of violent and/or sexual offenses in Germany between 1999 and 2015. The predictive accuracy of different methodological approaches of risk assessment (subjective clinical [i.e., unstructured clinical judgment; UCJ], structured professional judgment [SPJ], actuarial risk assessment instruments [ARAIs], and combinations of ARAIs-/SPJ-based risk assessments) was compared by analyzing the actual reoffenses according to the Federal Central Register (average follow-up period <i>M</i> = 7.08 years). In accordance with previously published results, the results indicated a higher predictive accuracy for structured compared to unstructured risk assessment approaches for the prediction of general, violent, and sexual recidivism. Taken together, the findings underline the limited accuracy of UCJs and provided further support for the use of structured and standardized risk assessment procedures in the area of crime and delinquency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"152-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9411433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scales probably do not validly measure need frustration.","authors":"Brett A Murphy, Ashley L Watts, Zachary G Baker, Brian P Don, Tatum A Jolink, Sara B Algoe","doi":"10.1037/pas0001193","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In basic psychological needs theory (BPNT), the separable constructs of need satisfaction and need frustration are theorized as pivotally related to psychopathology and broader aspects of well-being. The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Frustration Scales (BPNSFS; Chen et al., 2015) have rapidly emerged as the dominant self-report measure in the BPNT domain, with translated versions available in a wide range of languages and a plethora of versions adapted for specific populations and life contexts. Through (a) an extended conceptual discussion of the BPNSFS and (b) a collection of complementary data analyses in eight samples, we demonstrate that the BPNSFS probably does not validly measure need frustration. Most importantly, we conclude that the ostensible distinction between need frustration and need satisfaction in the BPNSFS is likely primarily a method artifact caused by different item keying directions, given the way the measure currently assesses the intended constructs. If so, then the use of the BPNSFS may be generating misleading conclusions, obstructing sound investigation of current BPNT. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"127-139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554446/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9723707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI-4R) substance use subscale in detecting substance use disorders in youth.","authors":"Angelina Pei-Tzu Tsai,&nbsp;Eric A Youngstrom,&nbsp;Kenneth D Gadow,&nbsp;Sarah M Horwitz,&nbsp;Mary A Fristad,&nbsp;Stacey B Daughters,&nbsp;Andrea S Young,&nbsp;L Eugene Arnold,&nbsp;Boris Birmaher,&nbsp;Stephanie Salcedo,&nbsp;The Lams Group,&nbsp;Robert L Findling","doi":"10.1037/pas0001182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001182","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying substance use disorders (SUDs) early and accurately improves case formulation and treatment. Previous studies have investigated validity and reliability of the Child and Adolescent Symptom Inventory (CASI) for anxiety, mood, and behavior problems. The present study's aim was to test if the embedded CASI Substance Use (SU) subscale can discriminate adolescents and young adults (AYA) with and without a SUD diagnosis accurately enough to justify clinical application within an evidence-based assessment framework. <i>N</i> = 479 outpatient AYA (age 14-21) and their caregivers completed <i>K-SADS-PLW</i> semistructured diagnostic interviews; caregivers completed the CASI and adolescents completed a parallel version, the Youth (self-report) Inventory (YI). <i>K-SADS-PLW</i> indicated that 33 youth met <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition</i> criteria for SUDs. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses found that both CASI and YI Substance Use subscale scores significantly identified K-SADS-diagnosed SUDs in AYA: Caregiver area under curve (AUC) = .91, <i>p</i> < .0005; YI(AUC) = .90, <i>p</i> < .0005. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between informants. Both subscales showed diagnostic and clinical utility in identifying AYA SUDs in outpatient mental health settings. Findings suggest that the CASI-4R subscale could be a helpful screening instrument for AYA SUDs. A case vignette illustrates the clinical application of study findings. Future research should examine rapport as a moderator of reporting accuracy, and replicate use of these measures under varying clinical scenarios. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"35 2","pages":"178-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9347181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Adaptation of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory–Brief Form (ESI-BF)","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001206.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001206.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41572665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for Psychometric Properties of a Combined Go/No-Go and Continuous Performance Task Across Childhood","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001202.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001202.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46032788","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Supplemental Material for Disentangling Language-Related Item Biases in Stress Research With People of Turkish Origin in Germany: An Application of the CCT Procedure","authors":"","doi":"10.1037/pas0001205.supp","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001205.supp","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46072525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}