Psychological Assessment最新文献

{"title":"A simple way to gamify ecological momentary assessment studies and improve survey adherence with adolescents: The Emoji Game.","authors":"Evan M Kleiman, Catherine R Glenn, Emelyn C Auad, Hannah R Krall, Abigail J Luce, Dana R Steinberg, Elizabeth A Edershile, Richard T Liu","doi":"10.1037/pas0001371","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001371","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of the largest challenges in intensive longitudinal monitoring studies (e.g., ecological momentary assessment [EMA]) that include repeated assessments of constructs of interest is getting participants to complete the surveys they are sent. The goal of this study was to test a simple gamification method called \"The Emoji Game\" that was designed to increase adherence with EMA surveys (i.e., compliance or completing more surveys). The game involved embedding an emoji (i.e., a pictogram) randomly into one of the survey questions, where both the emoji and question where the emoji was hidden changed every few days. Participants who found the emoji were given an entry into a raffle to win a bonus gift card. Participants were 85 adolescents, who were recently admitted to acute psychiatric care due to suicidal thoughts or behaviors, and administered an EMA protocol for 4 weeks after discharge. This study covered three time periods: the 4 months that we ran the Emoji Game (<i>n</i> = 31), the 4 months immediately before the Emoji Game (<i>n</i> = 22), and the same period as the Emoji Game 1 year prior (<i>n</i> = 32). We found that participants in the \"Emoji Game\" period completed significantly more surveys (M compliance = 63.07%) than either comparison group (40.47% and 43.98% for 4 months and 1 year prior, respectively). We found no differences among groups on survey engagement (e.g., number of zeros per survey, a metric of careless and quick responding). Taken together, this suggests that the Emoji Game is an easy, low-burden way to gamify EMA studies that increases compliance. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"288-296"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Test-retest reliability of computational parameters versus manifest behavior for decisional flexibility in psychosis.","authors":"Güldamla Kalender, Sarah T Olsen, Edward H Patzelt, Deanna M Barch, Cameron S Carter, James M Gold, J Daniel Ragland, Steven M Silverstein, Angus W MacDonald, Alik S Widge","doi":"10.1037/pas0001383","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Computational psychiatry aims to quantify individual patients' psychiatric pathology by measuring behavior during psychophysical tasks and characterizing the neurocomputational parameters underlying specific decision-making systems. While this approach has great potential for informing us about specific computational processes associated with psychopathology, the fundamental psychometric properties of computational assessments remain understudied. Optimizing these psychometric properties, including test-retest reliability, is essential for clinical utility. To address this gap, we assessed the test-retest reliability of manifest behavior and computational model parameters of a probabilistic reward and reversal learning task, two-armed Bandit, using intraclass correlations (ICCs) in 179 adults, including those with various psychosis-spectrum disorders and undiagnosed controls. We studied two computational models from recent literature: regression modeling of choice strategies and a hidden Markov model. The test-retest reliability for both manifest behavior (0.24 ≤ ICCs ≤ 0.54) and computational parameters (0.30 ≤ ICCs ≤ 0.61) ranged from poor to moderate, which was not explained by practice effects. Computational parameters did not outperform manifest behavior parameters. The reliability of computational parameters was generally-though not significantly-higher in healthy adults, which may potentially reflect the internal heterogeneity of categorical psychiatric diagnoses. Computational modeling holds promise, but tasks and analyses must be optimized for greater reliability before proceeding into clinical use. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"273-287"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12088905/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143803448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Single-item patient-rated helpfulness and improvement as an alternative to standardized questionnaires for establishing anxiety and depression treatment efficacy.","authors":"Patrycja Sewerynek,Caroline Wagner,Thomas McGregor,Megan Skelton,Thalia C Eley","doi":"10.1037/pas0001390","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001390","url":null,"abstract":"Evidence-based psychological treatments for anxiety and depression are widely used, yet roughly half of those treated do not respond. Treatment response prediction could help to optimize patient outcomes and use of clinical resources. However, existing longitudinal studies with potentially valuable predictors are unlikely to include comprehensive, prospective measures of symptoms throughout therapy. Single-item patient ratings of helpfulness and improvement are a potentially cost-effective and efficient alternative, but their relationship with typically used change score measures is unknown. Data were analyzed from 135 participants (124 female sex; 120 female gender; 127 White) who received cognitive-behavioral therapy. Anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and impairment (Work and Social Adjustment Scale) questionnaire scores were obtained before therapy (assessment), before each session, and 1-month posttreatment (follow-up). Helpfulness (binary) and improvement (continuous) ratings were collected at follow-up. Linear regression models assessed the relationship between helpfulness and improvement ratings and questionnaire change scores from the first to the last session. Logistic regressions modeled the relationships between single-item measures and National Health Service Talking Therapies outcomes, derived from questionnaire change scores. Helpfulness and improvement showed significant associations with questionnaire change scores as well as National Health Service Talking Therapies outcomes. In a joint model, improvement retained significant associations while helpfulness became nonsignificant. Improvement, and to a lesser extent helpfulness, patient ratings may be a cost-effective alternative for establishing treatment efficacy and outcome. The items' wording and response scales may underlie observed differences. While not equivalent to change score-based measures, they may be adequate for studies requiring large sample sizes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144065756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating the effect of experience sampling study design on careless and insufficient effort responding identified with a screen-time-based mixture model.","authors":"Esther Ulitzsch,Wolfgang Viechtbauer,Oliver Lüdtke,Inez Myin-Germeys,Gabriel Nagy,Steffen Nestler,Gudrun Vera Eisele","doi":"10.1037/pas0001379","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001379","url":null,"abstract":"When using the experience sampling method (ESM), researchers must navigate a delicate balance between obtaining fine-grained snapshots of phenomena of interest and avoiding undue respondent burden, which can lead to disengagement and compromise data quality. To guide that process, we investigated how questionnaire length and sampling frequency impact careless and insufficient effort responding (C/IER) as an important yet understudied aspect of ESM data quality. To this end, we made use of existing experimental ESM data (Eisele et al., 2022) from 163 students randomly assigned to one of two questionnaire lengths (30/60 items) and one of three sampling frequencies (3/6/9 assessments per day). We employed a novel mixture modeling approach (Ulitzsch, Nestler, et al., 2024) that leverages screen time data to disentangle attentive responding from C/IER and allows investigating how the occurrence of C/IER evolved within and across ESM study days. We found sampling frequency, but not questionnaire length, impacted C/IER, with higher frequencies resulting in higher overall C/IER proportions and sharper increases of C/IER across, but not within days. These effects proved robust across various model specifications. Further, we found no substantial relationships between model-implied C/IER and other engagement measures, such as self-reported attentiveness, attention checks, response-pattern-based attentiveness indicators, and compliance. Our findings contrast previous studies on noncompliance, suggesting that respondents may employ different strategies to lower the different types of burden imposed by questionnaire length and sampling frequency. Implications for designing ESM studies are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143920973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Longitudinal invariance of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised in adolescents.","authors":"Lilian Y Li,Madeline M McGregor,Sarah E Sarkas,Aishwarya Sritharan,Lili Massac,Marissa Valdespino,Allison M Letkiewicz,Katherine Durham,Randy P Auerbach,Stewart A Shankman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001392","url":null,"abstract":"The Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) is a widely used interview measure of adolescent major depression (major depressive disorder), with sum scores and their changes over time interpreted as changes in one underlying construct. This interpretation assumes that the CDRS-R measures a single construct of depression (unidimensionality) in the same way across time (longitudinal invariance)-assumptions that have yet to be established but were tested in this study. Adolescents (N = 197; ages 13-18 years old) with lifetime major depressive disorder, as well as healthy controls, completed the CDRS-R and a self-reported depression symptom measure, the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS), at baseline and 6 months follow-up. Unidimensionality of the CDRS-R at both time points was tested using the one-factor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure was examined in a CFA framework, and longitudinal invariance of the construct validity was examined by testing whether the correlation between the CDRS-R and IDAS was equivalent across time. The one-factor CFA model with correlated uniqueness among the three observational items demonstrated excellent fit. Longitudinal invariance of the factor structure (invariant uniqueness) and construct validity was achieved. At both baseline and 6-month assessments, the CDRS-R demonstrated good internal consistency (αs > .89) and was highly correlated with the IDAS (> 0.70). Findings support the practice of comparing observed scores of the CDRS-R between the baseline and the 6-month assessment among adolescents. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143914897","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Psychometric study of the revised Mood Rhythm Instrument (MRhI-r) in major depressive disorder.","authors":"Adile Nexha,Melissa Alves Braga de Oliveira,Euclides José de Mendonça Filho,Ana Adan,Maria Paz Hidalgo,Benicio N Frey","doi":"10.1037/pas0001387","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001387","url":null,"abstract":"Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects over 300 million people globally. The etiology of MDD is linked to circadian rhythm disruption, including the diurnal pattern of mood, cognition, and physiological processes. The revised Mood Rhythm Instrument (MRhI-r) was developed to assess self-perceived rhythmicity of symptoms and has previously been tested in nonclinical populations. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of the MRhI-r in a clinical MDD sample. Individuals with MDD and healthy controls completed the MRhI-r at baseline and after 2 weeks. Psychometric properties were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of factor structures previously determined in a nonclinical sample, item response theory (IRT), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Sex differences in symptom peak frequency and timing were assessed within the MDD group. The sample included 102 MDD participants (65% female, ages 17-70, M ± SD = 37 ± 14) and 94 healthy controls (67% female, ages 18-72, M ± SD = 37 ± 15). CFA showed excellent model fit and IRT analysis indicated good item fit. ROC analysis showed a diagnostic threshold of 2.5 with 64% sensitivity and 72% specificity. The MRhI-r scores demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .78, ω = .82) and moderate test-retest reliability (r = 0.69). No sex differences were found in peak frequency or timing within the MDD group. The psychometric properties of the MRhI-r in individuals with MDD support the three-factor model seen in previous studies. This study assesses the psychometric properties of the MRhI-r in a clinical sample, endorsing its use for evaluating symptom rhythmicity in clinically depressed individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143914898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Reproducible structure with measurement invariance for the Parent-Report Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire: Findings from three independent samples.","authors":"Michael B Kozlowski,Hannah E Morton,Joel T Nigg,Sarah L Karalunas","doi":"10.1037/pas0001368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001368","url":null,"abstract":"Differences in adolescent temperament are associated with innumerable psychological outcomes in the developmental literature and can help link adult personality-based nosology to earlier development. The Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised is one important measure of adolescent temperament designed to capture constructs within the influential Rothbart temperament model. Yet conflicting factor structures and minimal evidence for measurement invariance across samples and clinical groups have limited its ability to further temperament-based understanding of psychopathology. The goal of the present study was to identify reproducible measurement structures for the parent-rated and self-rated Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised in multiple large independent samples and to evaluate how that structure corresponded to their proposed theoretical structure. We also tested measurement invariance and compared temperament characteristics in youth with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Findings support the lower order theoretical structure using a reduced set of items in the parent-rated form, including evidence for measurement invariance across samples and clinical groups. Findings confirm important patterns of temperament variation associated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnosis, including lower effortful control and differences in expression of negative affect and surgency. The self-rated form demonstrated poor structural validity and could not be reliably replicated in a confirmatory sample. Parent-reported temperament may help link personality-based models of psychopathology to earlier developmental periods where psychopathology often emerges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"46 3 1","pages":"214-226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143862008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Comparison of self-report data validity in undergraduate samples using remote versus in-person administration methods.","authors":"Brinkley M Sharpe, Leigha Rose, Ashmita Ghosh, Nathaniel L Phillips, Donald R Lynam, Joshua D Miller","doi":"10.1037/pas0001377","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001377","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the internet age, recruitment, participation, and compensation for survey research can occur remotely, away from a laboratory setting. Although this method of data collection offers notable benefits such as access to more diverse samples and lower study costs, it is possible that rates of inattentive or otherwise invalid response patterns are more common when survey completion occurs without any oversight. To answer this question, undergraduate student participants (final <i>n</i> = 678; 65% women, 76% White/European American) were randomly assigned to complete a battery of self-report surveys either in a typical laboratory administration setting (in person) or remotely from the location of their choosing. Following a preregistered analytic plan, data from both conditions were screened using multiple methods for self-report data validation, including the use of embedded and stand-alone validity scales, response timing, and identification of multivariate outliers. Results showed null-to-small differences between survey administration conditions. However, differences between screening methods in the proportion of data flagged as \"invalid\" emerged. The implications of these findings for study design and planned analyses are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"227-236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143693132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Construction and preliminary validation of a Psychopathic Boldness Scale in college and online samples.","authors":"David K Marcus, Alexa M Lambros, Madeline G Nagel, Montana L Ploe, Keira L Monaghan, Brian F French","doi":"10.1037/pas0001378","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001378","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The triarchic model posits that boldness, meanness, and disinhibition comprise psychopathy. Critics have questioned whether boldness is essential to psychopathy because boldness is minimally related to meanness and disinhibition and is associated with positive outcomes such as psychological health. The aim of the present study was to develop a Psychopathic Boldness Scale (PBS) that would be more closely associated with the other components of the triarchic model and would be associated with antisocial behaviors and maladaptive traits. Data from two college student samples (a test development sample, <i>N</i> = 204 [79% female, 72% White], and a replication sample, <i>N</i> = 426 [81.5% female, 64% White]) and an online male validation sample (<i>N</i> = 125, 55% White) were used to select items and examine the factor structure, internal consistency reliability, item functioning, and convergent and discriminant validity of this scale. The PBS had a three-factor (higher order) structure in which the three factors (fearlessness, social potency, carefree rule breaking) were highly intercorrelated, justifying the use of a total score. The PBS was internally consistent, and all 21 items functioned well. The PBS was positively correlated with measures of boldness, meanness, and disinhibition. The PBS was positively associated with antisocial behavior, Machiavellianism, sensation seeking, fearlessness, and behavioral activation. It was negatively associated with agreeableness, conscientiousness, honesty-humility, altruism, and behavioral inhibition. Although additional research with diverse samples and biobehavioral correlates of boldness is needed, the PBS appears to be a promising measure that may address some of the criticisms of boldness as a component of psychopathy. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"249-259"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143731373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Initial development and psychometric properties of the Gambling Disorder Test in a nationally representative sample of adults.","authors":"Halley M Pontes, Špela Selak, Mark Žmavc, Mark D Griffiths","doi":"10.1037/pas0001374","DOIUrl":"10.1037/pas0001374","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gambling disorder (GD) is an officially recognized mental health disorder. However, its conceptualization and diagnostic criteria have changed substantially over the years due to new clinical and epidemiological research supporting its reconceptualization from an impulse control disorder to an addictive disorder. The evolving nature of GD led to changes in its diagnostic approach within the 11^th revision of the <i>International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems</i> <i>(ICD-11</i>). However, no updated standardized psychometric test reflecting the latest developments exists. Therefore, the goal of the present study was to develop and report the psychometric properties of the Gambling Disorder Test (GDT), a brief and convenient four-item assessment instrument reflecting the current diagnostic criteria for GD in the ICD-11. A nationally representative sample of British adults was recruited (<i>N</i> = 1,028, <i>M</i>_age = 46.54 years, <i>SD</i>_age = 15.71). The results showed a one-factor solution for the GDT and initial support for the scale's factorial validity, population cross-validity, criterion validity, concurrent validity, and reliability. Further gender-based measurement invariance was conducted, with the GDT exhibiting full scalar invariance and the results of latent mean comparison showing that males had significantly higher GD latent means compared to females (latent mean difference = -0.156; <i>z</i> = -3.844, <i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = -.249). The self-reported prevalence of GD in the sample was 0.49%. The GDT is a promising brief assessment instrument based on the latest conceptualization and diagnostic criteria for GD that can be employed by clinicians and researchers alike. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"237-248"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143693134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}