Development of a new measure of encounters with health care barriers: The Commonly Experienced Health Care Barriers Index.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1037/pas0001284
Alannah Shelby Rivers, Keith Sanford, Morgan Brewington, Ashley Buchanan
{"title":"Development of a new measure of encounters with health care barriers: The Commonly Experienced Health Care Barriers Index.","authors":"Alannah Shelby Rivers, Keith Sanford, Morgan Brewington, Ashley Buchanan","doi":"10.1037/pas0001284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Common barriers to health care, such as lack of insurance or transportation, hold a key theoretical role in many models attempting to explain problems with health care utilization (not seeking needed health care). However, the assessment of barriers is often post hoc, with no existing scales appropriate for a general population. This study developed and tested a new measure of commonly experienced health care barriers across three studies (Study 1, <i>N</i> = 194; Study 2, <i>N</i> = 206; Study 3, <i>N</i> = 741). Items were developed in line with recommendations for causal indicator models, emphasizing content validity. The measure showed preliminary test-retest reliability, sensitivity to health care inequities between Black and White individuals (beyond socioeconomic status and including association with health care discrimination), expected associations with health care utilization problems and other health experiences and life stressors, and unique associations with health care utilization problems accounting for health experiences and life stressors. The new measure has the potential to identify modifiable factors related to health care inequities and common problems with health care utilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":" ","pages":"30-40"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common barriers to health care, such as lack of insurance or transportation, hold a key theoretical role in many models attempting to explain problems with health care utilization (not seeking needed health care). However, the assessment of barriers is often post hoc, with no existing scales appropriate for a general population. This study developed and tested a new measure of commonly experienced health care barriers across three studies (Study 1, N = 194; Study 2, N = 206; Study 3, N = 741). Items were developed in line with recommendations for causal indicator models, emphasizing content validity. The measure showed preliminary test-retest reliability, sensitivity to health care inequities between Black and White individuals (beyond socioeconomic status and including association with health care discrimination), expected associations with health care utilization problems and other health experiences and life stressors, and unique associations with health care utilization problems accounting for health experiences and life stressors. The new measure has the potential to identify modifiable factors related to health care inequities and common problems with health care utilization. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

开发一种新的衡量遇到医疗保健障碍的方法:常见医疗保健障碍指数。
医疗保健的常见障碍,如缺乏保险或交通,在许多试图解释医疗保健利用问题(不寻求所需的医疗保健)的模型中发挥着关键的理论作用。然而,对障碍的评估往往是事后的,没有适合普通人群的现有量表。这项研究开发并测试了三项研究中常见的医疗保健障碍的新测量方法(研究1,N=194;研究2,N=206;研究3,N=741)。项目是根据因果指标模型的建议制定的,强调内容的有效性。该指标显示了初步的重新测试可靠性、对黑人和白人之间医疗保健不平等的敏感性(超出社会经济地位,包括与医疗保健歧视的关联)、与医疗保健利用问题和其他健康经历和生活压力源的预期关联,以及与考虑到健康经历和生活压力源的医疗保健利用问题的独特关联。这项新措施有可能确定与医疗保健不公平和医疗保健利用常见问题有关的可改变因素。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信