The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) self-report version: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and predictive validity in justice-involved male adolescents.

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1037/pas0001322
Emily C Kemp, James V Ray, Paul J Frick, Laura C Thornton, Tina D Wall Myers, Emily L Robertson, Laurence Steinberg, Elizabeth Cauffman
{"title":"The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) self-report version: Factor structure, measurement invariance, and predictive validity in justice-involved male adolescents.","authors":"Emily C Kemp, James V Ray, Paul J Frick, Laura C Thornton, Tina D Wall Myers, Emily L Robertson, Laurence Steinberg, Elizabeth Cauffman","doi":"10.1037/pas0001322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) is a widely used measure of callous-unemotional (CU) traits that may aid in the assessment of the diagnostic specifier \"with limited prosocial emotions,\" which has been added to diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder. Though there is substantial support for use of the ICU total score, the scale's factor structure has been highly debated. Inconsistencies in past factor analyses may be largely attributed to failure to control for method variance due to item wording (i.e., half of the items being worded in the callous direction and half worded in the prosocial direction). Thus, the present study used a multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analytic approach that models both trait and method variance to test the factor structure of the ICU self-report in a clinically relevant, high-risk sample of justice-involved male adolescents (<i>N</i> = 1,216). When comparing the fit of empirical and theoretical models, goodness of fit indices (χ² = 1105.877, <i>df</i> = 190, root-mean-square error of approximation = .063, comparative fit index = .916, Tucker-Lewis index = .878, standardized root-mean-square residual = .051) provided support for a hierarchical four-factor model (i.e., one overarching callous-unemotional factor, four latent trait factors) when accounting for method variance (i.e., covarying positively worded items). This factor structure is consistent with the way the ICU was constructed and with criteria for the limited prosocial emotions specifier. In addition, measurement invariance of this factor structure across age, race, and ethnicity was supported, and the predictive validity of the ICU was supported across these demographic groups in predicting self-reported antisocial behavior and rearrests over a 5-year period following an adolescent's first arrest. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU) is a widely used measure of callous-unemotional (CU) traits that may aid in the assessment of the diagnostic specifier "with limited prosocial emotions," which has been added to diagnostic criteria for conduct disorder. Though there is substantial support for use of the ICU total score, the scale's factor structure has been highly debated. Inconsistencies in past factor analyses may be largely attributed to failure to control for method variance due to item wording (i.e., half of the items being worded in the callous direction and half worded in the prosocial direction). Thus, the present study used a multitrait-multimethod confirmatory factor analytic approach that models both trait and method variance to test the factor structure of the ICU self-report in a clinically relevant, high-risk sample of justice-involved male adolescents (N = 1,216). When comparing the fit of empirical and theoretical models, goodness of fit indices (χ² = 1105.877, df = 190, root-mean-square error of approximation = .063, comparative fit index = .916, Tucker-Lewis index = .878, standardized root-mean-square residual = .051) provided support for a hierarchical four-factor model (i.e., one overarching callous-unemotional factor, four latent trait factors) when accounting for method variance (i.e., covarying positively worded items). This factor structure is consistent with the way the ICU was constructed and with criteria for the limited prosocial emotions specifier. In addition, measurement invariance of this factor structure across age, race, and ethnicity was supported, and the predictive validity of the ICU was supported across these demographic groups in predicting self-reported antisocial behavior and rearrests over a 5-year period following an adolescent's first arrest. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

冷酷无情-情绪特质量表(ICU)自我报告版:涉及司法问题的男性青少年的因子结构、测量不变性和预测有效性。
冷漠无情特质量表(ICU)是一种广泛使用的冷漠无情(CU)特质测量方法,可帮助评估 "亲社会情感有限 "这一诊断指标,该指标已被添加到行为障碍的诊断标准中。虽然 ICU 总分的使用得到了大量支持,但该量表的因子结构一直备受争议。以往因子分析的不一致性在很大程度上可归因于未能控制因项目措辞(即一半项目的措辞偏向冷酷无情,一半项目的措辞偏向亲社会)而导致的方法变异。因此,本研究采用了一种多特质、多方法的确认性因子分析方法,对特质和方法方差进行建模,以测试ICU自我报告的因子结构,研究对象为临床相关的高风险涉法男性青少年样本(N = 1,216)。在比较经验模型和理论模型的拟合程度时,拟合优度指数(χ² = 1105.877,df = 190,均方根近似误差 = .063,比较拟合指数 = .916,塔克-刘易斯指数 = .878,标准化均方根残差 = .051)支持分层四因素模型(即:一个总体的 "胼胝-非胼胝 "因素,一个总体的 "胼胝-非胼胝 "因素,一个总体的 "胼胝-非胼胝 "因素,一个总体的 "胼胝-非胼胝 "因素)、在考虑方法变异(即正向措辞项目的共变)时,支持分层四因子模型(即一个总体的 "冷酷无情"-"非情感 "因子,四个潜在特质因子)。这种因子结构与 ICU 的构建方式和有限亲社会情绪指标的标准是一致的。此外,该因子结构在不同年龄、种族和民族之间的测量不变性也得到了支持,而且 ICU 在预测青少年首次被捕后 5 年内自我报告的反社会行为和再次被捕方面的预测有效性也得到了这些人口统计群体的支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信