Psychometric properties of the German versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale for Children (PAID-C) with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents (P-PAID-C).

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Su-Jong Kim-Dorner,Heike Saßmann,Juliane R Framme,Bettina Heidtmann,Thomas M Kapellen,Olga Kordonouri,Karolin M E Nettelrodt,Nicole Pisarek,Roland Schweizer,Simone von Sengbusch,Karin Lange
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the German versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale for Children (PAID-C) with Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents (P-PAID-C).","authors":"Su-Jong Kim-Dorner,Heike Saßmann,Juliane R Framme,Bettina Heidtmann,Thomas M Kapellen,Olga Kordonouri,Karolin M E Nettelrodt,Nicole Pisarek,Roland Schweizer,Simone von Sengbusch,Karin Lange","doi":"10.1037/pas0001338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parent-caregivers often experience diabetes distress due to the daily demands of diabetes management. Regular screening for diabetes distress is needed to prevent the deterioration of metabolic control and the development of mental health disorders. The aim of this analysis was to examine the psychometric properties of the German versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale for Children (PAID-C) and for caregiver burden in Parents (P-PAID-C). Data were collected from 136 children aged 7-12 years (46.7% females) and 304 parents (Mage = 42.9 (SD 6.1) years; 78% mothers) by using linguistically translated questionnaires in a multicenter study. Confirmatory factor analysis and correlational analyses were conducted. Results confirmed the two-factor model for the PAID-C and the four-factor model for the P-PAID-C with a slight modification. Cronbach's αs for children and parents were 0.88 and 0.92, respectively. The PAID-C and P-PAID-C scores had small positive associations with HbA1c (rs = .220 and .139, respectively, all p < .05) and strong inverse association with the KIDSCREEN-10 index (r = -.643 and -.520, respectively, all p < .001). P-PAID-C scores increased with increasing depressive symptoms measured in nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire among parents (rs = .534, p < .001). The scores produced by the German PAID-C and P-PAID-C were reliable and valid in measuring diabetes burdens. These German versions of PAID can be utilized to assess diabetes-specific distress and to design interventions for children and their parents experiencing high levels of diabetes distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) and their parent-caregivers often experience diabetes distress due to the daily demands of diabetes management. Regular screening for diabetes distress is needed to prevent the deterioration of metabolic control and the development of mental health disorders. The aim of this analysis was to examine the psychometric properties of the German versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale for Children (PAID-C) and for caregiver burden in Parents (P-PAID-C). Data were collected from 136 children aged 7-12 years (46.7% females) and 304 parents (Mage = 42.9 (SD 6.1) years; 78% mothers) by using linguistically translated questionnaires in a multicenter study. Confirmatory factor analysis and correlational analyses were conducted. Results confirmed the two-factor model for the PAID-C and the four-factor model for the P-PAID-C with a slight modification. Cronbach's αs for children and parents were 0.88 and 0.92, respectively. The PAID-C and P-PAID-C scores had small positive associations with HbA1c (rs = .220 and .139, respectively, all p < .05) and strong inverse association with the KIDSCREEN-10 index (r = -.643 and -.520, respectively, all p < .001). P-PAID-C scores increased with increasing depressive symptoms measured in nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire among parents (rs = .534, p < .001). The scores produced by the German PAID-C and P-PAID-C were reliable and valid in measuring diabetes burdens. These German versions of PAID can be utilized to assess diabetes-specific distress and to design interventions for children and their parents experiencing high levels of diabetes distress. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
德文版 1 型糖尿病患儿及其家长糖尿病问题领域量表 (PAID-C) 的心理计量特性 (P-PAID-C)。
1 型糖尿病(T1D)患儿及其父母照顾者经常会因为糖尿病的日常管理需求而感到糖尿病困扰。需要定期筛查糖尿病困扰,以防止代谢控制恶化和精神疾病的发展。本分析旨在研究德国版儿童糖尿病问题领域量表(PAID-C)和父母照顾者负担量表(P-PAID-C)的心理测量特性。在一项多中心研究中,通过使用语言翻译问卷收集了 136 名 7-12 岁儿童(46.7% 为女性)和 304 名家长(年龄 = 42.9 (SD 6.1) 岁;78% 为母亲)的数据。研究进行了确认性因素分析和相关分析。结果证实了 PAID-C 的双因素模型和 P-PAID-C 的四因素模型(略有修改)。儿童和家长的 Cronbach's α 分别为 0.88 和 0.92。PAID-C 和 P-PAID-C 分数与 HbA1c 有微小的正相关性(rs 分别为 0.220 和 0.139,均 p < 0.05),与 KIDSCREEN-10 指数有较强的反相关性(r 分别为 -.643 和 -.520,均 p < 0.001)。P-PAID-C得分随着父母九项患者健康问卷中抑郁症状的增加而增加(rs = .534,p < .001)。德文 PAID-C 和 P-PAID-C 的得分在衡量糖尿病负担方面既可靠又有效。这些德文版 PAID 可用于评估糖尿病特有的困扰,并为面临严重糖尿病困扰的儿童及其父母设计干预措施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信