Organizational Research Methods最新文献_第7页

Endogenous Moderator Models: What They are, What They Aren’t, and Why it Matters 内生中介模型：它们是什么，它们不是什么，以及为什么重要

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2022-01-06 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211065111

J. Cortina, C. Dormann, Hannah M. Markell, Sheila K. Keener

引用次数: 3

Conducting and Evaluating Multilevel Studies: Recommendations, Resources, and a Checklist 开展和评估多层次研究:建议、资源和清单

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2022-01-05 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211060712

Vicente González-Romá, Ana Hernández

引用次数: 13

A Review of Measurement Equivalence in Organizational Research: What's Old, What's New, What's Next? 组织研究中的测量等效:什么是旧的，什么是新的，下一步是什么?

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211056524

Ajay V. Somaraju, Christopher D. Nye, J. Olenick

引用次数: 11

The Quick and the Careless: The Construct Validity of Page Time as a Measure of Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys 快速与粗心:网页时间的构念效度作为回应调查努力不足的衡量标准

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211056520

N. Bowling, Jason L. Huang, Cheyna K. Brower, Caleb B. Bragg

{"title":"The Quick and the Careless: The Construct Validity of Page Time as a Measure of Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys","authors":"N. Bowling, Jason L. Huang, Cheyna K. Brower, Caleb B. Bragg","doi":"10.1177/10944281211056520","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211056520","url":null,"abstract":"Several recent studies have examined the prevention, causes, and consequences of insufficient effort responding (IER) to surveys. Scientific progress in this area, however, rests on the availability of construct-valid IER measures. In the current paper we describe the potential merits of the page time index, which is computed by counting the number of questionnaire pages to which a participant has responded more quickly than two seconds per item (see Huang et al., 2012). We conducted three studies (total N = 1,056) to examine the page time index's construct validity. Across these studies, we found that page time converged highly with other IER indices, that it was sensitive to an experimental manipulation warning participants to respond carefully, and that it predicted the extent to which participants were unable to recognize item content. We also found that page time's validity was superior to that of total completion time and that the two-seconds-per-item rule yielded a construct-valid page time score for items of various word lengths. Given its apparent validity, we provide practical recommendations for the use of the page time index.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"26 1","pages":"323 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41503816","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 19

Erratum to Interaction Effects in Cross-Lagged Panel Models: SEM with Latent Interactions Applied to Work-Family Conflict, Job Satisfaction, and Gender 交叉滞后面板模型中互动效应的勘误表：潜在互动的SEM应用于工作-家庭冲突、工作满意度和性别

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-12-04 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211067746

引用次数: 0

The Use and Misuse of Organizational Research Methods ‘Best Practice’ Articles 组织研究方法“最佳实践”文章的使用和误用

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-12-03 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211060706

Liana M. Kreamer, Betsy H. Albritton, Scott Tonidandel, S. Rogelberg

{"title":"The Use and Misuse of Organizational Research Methods ‘Best Practice’ Articles","authors":"Liana M. Kreamer, Betsy H. Albritton, Scott Tonidandel, S. Rogelberg","doi":"10.1177/10944281211060706","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211060706","url":null,"abstract":"This study explores how researchers in the organizational sciences use and/or cite methodological ‘best practice’ (BP) articles. Namely, are scholars adhering fully to the prescribed practices they cite, or are they cherry picking from recommended practices without disclosing? Or worse yet, are scholars inaccurately following the methodological best practices they cite? To answer these questions, we selected three seminal and highly cited best practice articles published in Organizational Research Methods (ORM) within the past ten years. These articles offer clear and specific methodological recommendations for researchers as they make decisions regarding the design, measurement, and interpretation of empirical studies. We then gathered all articles that have cited these best practice pieces. Using comprehensive coding forms, we evaluated how authors are using and citing best practice articles (e.g., if they are appropriately following the recommended practices). Our results revealed substantial variation in how authors cited best practice articles, with 17.4% appropriately citing, 47.7% citing with minor inaccuracies, and 34.5% inappropriately citing BP articles. These findings shed light on the use (and misuse) of methodological recommendations, offering insight into how we can better improve our digestion and implementation of best practices as we design and test research and theory. Key implications and recommendations for editors, reviewers, and authors are discussed.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"26 1","pages":"387 - 408"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44669351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Inflection Points, Kinks, and Jumps: A Statistical Approach to Detecting Nonlinearities 拐点、扭结和跳跃：一种检测非线性的统计方法

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-12-03 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211058466

Peren Arin, M. Minniti, S. Murtinu, Nicola Spagnolo

{"title":"Inflection Points, Kinks, and Jumps: A Statistical Approach to Detecting Nonlinearities","authors":"Peren Arin, M. Minniti, S. Murtinu, Nicola Spagnolo","doi":"10.1177/10944281211058466","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211058466","url":null,"abstract":"Inflection points, kinks, and jumps identify places where the relationship between dependent and independent variables switches in some important way. Although these switch points are often mentioned in management research, their presence in the data is either ignored, or postulated ad hoc by testing arbitrarily specified functional forms (e.g., U or inverted U-shaped relationships). This is problematic if we want accurate tests for our theories. To address this issue, we provide an integrative framework for the identification of nonlinearities. Our approach constitutes a precursor step that researchers will want to conduct before deciding which estimation model may be most appropriate. We also provide instructions on how our approach can be implemented, and a replicable illustration of the procedure. Our illustrative example shows how the identification of endogenous switch points may lead to significantly different conclusions compared to those obtained when switch points are ignored or their existence is conjectured arbitrarily. This supports our claim that capturing empirically the presence of nonlinearity is important and should be included in our empirical investigations.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"25 1","pages":"786 - 814"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45552385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

Making the Invisible Visible: Guidelines for the Coding Process in Meta-Analyses 让看不见的东西可见：元分析中的编码过程指南

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211046312

Jessica Villiger, Simone A. Schweiger, Artur Baldauf

{"title":"Making the Invisible Visible: Guidelines for the Coding Process in Meta-Analyses","authors":"Jessica Villiger, Simone A. Schweiger, Artur Baldauf","doi":"10.1177/10944281211046312","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211046312","url":null,"abstract":"This article contributes to the practice of coding in meta-analyses by offering direction and advice for experienced and novice meta-analysts on the “how” of coding. The coding process, the invisible architecture of any meta-analysis, has received comparably little attention in methodological resources, leaving the research community with insufficient guidance on “how” it should be rigorously planned (i.e., cohere with the research objective), conducted (i.e., make reliable and valid coding decisions), and reported (i.e., in a sufficiently transparent manner for readers to comprehend the authors’ decision-making). A lack of rigor in these areas can lead to erroneous results, which is problematic for entire research communities who build their future knowledge upon meta-analyses. Along four steps, the guidelines presented here elucidate “how” the coding process can be performed in a coherent, efficient, and credible manner that enables connectivity with future research, thereby enhancing the reliability and validity of meta-analytic findings. Our recommendations also support editors and reviewers in advising authors on how to improve the rigor of their coding and ultimately establish higher quality standards in meta-analytic research.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"25 1","pages":"716 - 740"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47471672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 12

Interaction Effects in Cross-Lagged Panel Models: SEM with Latent Interactions Applied to Work-Family Conflict, Job Satisfaction, and Gender 交叉滞后面板模型的交互作用:潜在交互作用的SEM在工作-家庭冲突、工作满意度和性别中的应用

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211043733

Ozlem Ozkok, Manuel J Vaulont, M. Zyphur, Zhen Zhang, Kristopher J Preacher, Peter Koval, Yixia Zheng

{"title":"Interaction Effects in Cross-Lagged Panel Models: SEM with Latent Interactions Applied to Work-Family Conflict, Job Satisfaction, and Gender","authors":"Ozlem Ozkok, Manuel J Vaulont, M. Zyphur, Zhen Zhang, Kristopher J Preacher, Peter Koval, Yixia Zheng","doi":"10.1177/10944281211043733","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281211043733","url":null,"abstract":"Researchers often combine longitudinal panel data analysis with tests of interactions (i.e., moderation). A popular example is the cross-lagged panel model (CLPM). However, interaction tests in CLPMs and related models require caution because stable (i.e., between-level, B) and dynamic (i.e., within-level, W) sources of variation are present in longitudinal data, which can conflate estimates of interaction effects. We address this by integrating literature on CLPMs, multilevel moderation, and latent interactions. Distinguishing stable B and dynamic W parts, we describe three types of interactions that are of interest to researchers: 1) purely dynamic or WxW; 2) cross-level or BxW; and 3) purely stable or BxB. We demonstrate estimating latent interaction effects in a CLPM using a Bayesian SEM in Mplus to apply relationships among work-family conflict and job satisfaction, using gender as a stable B variable. We support our approach via simulations, demonstrating that our proposed CLPM approach is superior to a traditional CLPMs that conflate B and W sources of variation. We describe higher-order nonlinearities as a possible extension, and we discuss limitations and future research directions.","PeriodicalId":19689,"journal":{"name":"Organizational Research Methods","volume":"25 1","pages":"673 - 715"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48057256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

Inaugural Editorial 就职社论

IF 9.5 2区管理学

Organizational Research Methods Pub Date : 2021-11-13 DOI: 10.1177/10944281211058903

T. Köhler, L. Lambert

引用次数: 0