Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum最新文献

{"title":"Expulsion for Adultery Perpetrators Muhshan at Panyabungan: An Islamic Law Perspective","authors":"Arbanur Rasyid","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1157","url":null,"abstract":": This article examines the practice of expelling perpetrators muhshan in the Panyabungan society, which normatively (Islamic law) should be punished by stoning. This phenomenon is fascinating to study because the Panyabungan people are Islamic followers who are very fanatical and have a strong religion. This article is based on field data supplemented by library data. Three fundamental issues are examined in this article, namely the process of enforcing customary law for adulterers muhshan in Panyabungan society, the argument for the application of expulsion punishment to adulterers' muhshan , and how Islamic law views the practice of expulsion in the case of adultery. Uses a normative and sociological approach this article finds the fact that the practice of expulsion of adulterers muhshan in Panyabungan is enforced if the perpetrator has been proven to have committed adultery. The practice of expelling the perpetrators of muhshan adultery is carried out for two reasons: following the traditions or customs that have been in effect and the impossibility of applying the stoning law in Indonesia. This article also finds evidence that the purpose of imposing the penalty of expulsion for adulterers muhshan in Panyabungan is to give a deterrent effect to the perpetrators of adultery and, at the same time as a preventive measure for people not to commit adultery. In addition, the punishment is also intended to maintain the excellent name and cleanliness of the village from disobedience acts.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121496778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Ineffectiveness of Mediation in Divorce Disputes: A Case Study in the Palembang Religious Court","authors":"Sri Turatmiyah, Joni Emirzon, A. y, Haniyatul Husna Binti Md Mohtar","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1232","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1232","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article examines the ineffective of the mediation process in divorce disputes at the Palembang Religious Court during the period from 2020 to 2022. Data was collected through observations, documentation, and interviews with litigants and judges involved in divorce cases at the Palembang Religious Court. Relying on the legal effectiveness theory, the study found that over a span of three years (2020, 2021, and 2022), the Palembang Religious Court successfully mediated only 33 divorce disputes (0.45%) out of a total of 7,338 cases. This indicates that mediation of divorce disputes at the court has not been effectively implemented. The article also reveals several factors contributing to this ineffectiveness, including (1) the complex background and reasons for the parties involved in the disputes, (2) an imbalance between the number of mediator judges and the number of cases brought to the court, (3) a lack of good faith on the part of the parties to engage in the mediation process, (4) inadequate resources and facilities, and (5) a low legal culture and poor legal awareness among the litigants. These findings reinforce the results of previous research on the ineffectiveness of mediation in divorce lawsuits in various courts across Indonesia.Abstrak: Artikel ini mengkaji problem tidak efektifnya proses mediasi sengketa perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palembang selama rentang waktu 2020 hingga 2022. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, dokumentasi dan wawancara dengan sejumlah narasumber, baik yang berperkara maupun yang menangani perkara perceraian di Pengadian Agama Palembang. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa dalam kurun waktu tiga tahun (2020, 2021 dan 2022), Pengadilan Agama Palembang hanya berhasil memediasi 33 sengketa perceraian (0.45%) dari total 7.338 sengekta perceraian. Hal ini membuktikan bahwa mediasi sengketa perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Palembang belum berjalan secara efektif. Artikel ini juga menemukan bahwa penyebab tidak efektifnya proses mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Palembang, yakni (1) kompleksnya latar belakang alasan para pihak yang bersengketa atau mengajukan perceraian, (2) tidak berimbangnya rasio jumlah hakim mediator dengan banyaknya jumlah perkara yang masuk ke pengadilan, (3) tidak adanya itikad baik dari para pihak untuk melakukan proses mediasi, (4) sarana dan fasilitas yang tidak memadai, dan (5) budaya hukum yang rendah dan minimnya pengetahuan dan kesadaran hukum di kalangan para pihak yang bersengketa. Temuan ini menguatkan hasil penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya tentang tidak efektifnya mediasi dalam sengketa perceraian di berbagai Pengadilan di Indoensia. Keywords: The effectiveness of mediation; divorce disputes; the Palembang Religious Court ","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116971338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rethinking the Minimum Age of Marriage Law in Indonesia: Insights from Muḥammad ‘Ābid al-Jābirī’s Epistemology","authors":"Ahmad Ropei, Adudin Alijaya, Muhammad Zaki Akhbar Hasan, Fakhry Fadhil","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1111","url":null,"abstract":": This article analyzes the renewal of Indonesia ’ s minimum age of marriage law. Previously, the legal age for men was 19 years, and for women was 16 years. However, Law No. 16 of 2019 amended the law, setting the minimum age of marriage at 19 years for both genders. Notably, this increase for women contradicts certain fiqh texts and is the highest age limit among several Muslim countries. This study employs Mu ḥ ammad ‘Ābid al - Jābirī’ s bayānī (indication/explication) and burhānī (demonstration/proof) epistemology to examine the subject. This article identifies the ideal age range for marriage as 19 to 25 years, when individuals reach balig (maturity) and rusydan (legal capacity), demonstrating readiness and mental maturity for marital life. The renewal of Indonesia ’ s marriage age limit aligns with Mu ḥ ammad ‘Ābid al - Jābirī’ s epistemology, which integrates na ṣ (Al-Qur ’ an and hadīth ) with rational reasoning and empirical evidence.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"404 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115996896","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ta’aruf Rules in Digital Room: Study of Matchmaking Process on Biro Jodoh Rumaysho Social Media","authors":"Dwi Sri Handayani","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1041","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1041","url":null,"abstract":": This study examines the online taa'ruf process through social media that is run by the Biro Jodoh Rumaysho (BJR) and at the same time the reciprocal relationship between managers and participants. Data was collected through observation, documentation and interviews with the managers of the Biro Jodoh Rumaysho and ta’aruf participans as well as searching through online media. Using an empiric-netnographical approach, and by utilizing convergence theory, it was found that the Rumaysho Matchmaking Bureau had facilitated many people who wanted to find a life partner through the stages of ta'aruf. These services are carried out online through social media, such as Instagram, Facebook, and also the Website. The success rate of ta'aruf with this model is relatively high because it has been filtered based on the criteria desired by each potential partner. The ta'aruf process which is carried out in this way has led to a social phenomenon in society which makes ta'aruf a religious and also economic spirit, both for implementing agencies and participants where there is mutuality between the two.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116325412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Dualism and Unworthy Legal Practice: The Marginalization of Women's Rights in Sirri and Early Marriages","authors":"Abi Hasan, Achmad Musyahid, A. Asman","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Marriage is a constitutional right of Indonesian citizens, but not all marriages end in favour to women. From a legal and normative standpoint, this study examines how sirri and early marriage marginalize women. This article is library research. Datas were collected by conducting study of primary and secondary legal materials. The findings of this study demonstrate that sirri marriage is manifestly ineffective and contrary to the Indonesian Marriage Law. Women in sirri marriages do not have proper inheritance rights because sirri marriages are not recognized by state law, despite the fact that they are valid under religious law. In a similar vein, it appears that women's rights are not guaranteed in early marriage because couples in general lack the capacity and maturity to manage rights, obligations, and roles within the household; even early marriage appears to be \"forced.\"Abstrak: Pernikahan merupakan hak konstitusional warga negara Indonesia. Akan tetapi, tidak semua pernikahan, baik praktik maupun aturan hukumnya menguntungkan bagi semua pihak, terutama bagi perempuan. Artikel ini mengkaji marginalisasi perempuan dalam kasus nikah sirri dan nikah dini dengan perspektif yuridis-normatif. Data-data dikumpulkan dari bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pernikahan sirri jelas tidak efektif dan cukup menyimpang dari ketentuan Undang-undang Perkawinan Indonesia. Kaum perempuan dalam pernikahan sirri tidak diuntungkan dalam pembagian harta warisan karena pernikahan mereka tidak dikuatkan dengan akta nikah, walaupun pernikahan tersebut dinilai sah menurut hukum agama. Hal yang sama juga terjadi pada pernikahan dini karena hak-hak perempuan pada kenyataannya tidak terjamin. Hal ini disebabkan para pasangan dalam pernikahan dini, umumnya, belum memiliki kapasitas dan kedewasaan yang cukup dalam manajemen hak, kewajiban, dan peran dalam rumah tangga. Pernikahan dini bahkan terkesan sebagai pernikahan yang “dipaksakan”.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124974898","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Legal Effects of the Constitutional Court's Ruling Against Marital Agreement in Mixed Marriages","authors":"Maulidia Mulyani","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.660","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.660","url":null,"abstract":": Prior to the issuance of the Constitutional Court (MK) decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, some mixed-marriage couples complained about the state policy that does not allow mixed-marriage couples to own assets, both in the form of building use rights (HGB) and business use rights (HGU). This article examines a marriage agreement made by a mixed marriage couple, namely Indonesian and foreign couples after the Constitutional Court decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015. The fundamental issues that is the focus of this article is how is the legal impact of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 on marriage agreements in mixed marriages? The following findings were obtained using a juridical-normative approach and utilizing Gustav Radburch's theory of the legal purpose: first, after the Constitutional Court decision the perpetrators of mixed marriages had a looser time to make a marriage agreement. They can agree before the marriage contract or during the marriage bond. Second, a marriage agreement made during the marriage period will be valid the moment after it is made, and the separation of the joint property of both parties can immediately follow it. Third, when viewed from the theory of Gustav Radburch's legal objectives, the Constitutional Court Decision has fulfilled the purpose of making law: the realization of justice, certainty, and legal expediency. However, on the other hand, the Constitutional Court ruling has also put third parties in a vulnerable position.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134043094","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Debates in Modern Economic Transactions: Assessing the Gopay Agreement in the Perspective of Indonesian Ulama","authors":"Khadijatul Musanna, Ali Sodiqin","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1040","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"284 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124544196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Challenge of Indonesian Customary Law Enforcement in the Coexistence of State Law","authors":"Orien Effendi","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1033","url":null,"abstract":": This article examines the challenges that arise from implementing customary law in Indonesian society amidst the predominance of state law. The data was collected from primary and secondary legal materials as well as facts on the ground. Applying a juridical-empirical approach, this study identifies various factors that contribute to difficulties in the application of customary law, including the tendency for law enforcers to prioritize state law over customary law, and the textual understanding of law that permeates legal discourse. Furthermore, efforts to unify the law have also created additional problems for customary law. In addition, this article also finds evidence that a number of concepts offered by experts in overcoming this problem are in fact not able to guarantee the application of customary law in the life of Indonesian society. Thus, it is necessary to support these proposals with legal-political changes that can ensure the existence and enforceability of customary law in Indonesian society.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121897445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Liability for Nuclear Damage: Perspectives of International Conventions, Indonesian Positive Law, and Islamic Law","authors":"Gumilang Fuadi, M. Ichsan","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1223","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i2.1223","url":null,"abstract":": Utilization of nuclear energy for nuclear power plants (PLTN/NPP) has great benefits for human life and, at the same time, can also cause an enormous negative impact in the event of an accident. And it is necessary to take responsibility for nuclear losses that might occur. This article examines the liability for nuclear damage from the perspective of international conventions, Indonesian positive law, and Islamic law. This article is a normative-doctrinal study. Using a conceptual, statutory, and comparative approach, this article concludes that there are similarities regarding the principle of liability for nuclear damage in the three legal systems (international conventions, Indonesian positive law, and Islamic law), namely that both adhere to the principle of strict liability, although in Islamic law it is not stated explicitly. On the other hand, some differences between the three legal systems, especially regarding the form of liability and the amount of compensation or compensation that must be given. In international conventions and Indonesian positive law, the responsibility for nuclear damage is attached to the nuclear operator, while in Islamic law, the responsibility for losses is borne by the party carrying out the damage. As for the limit for giving compensation, international conventions and Indonesian positive law have definitively determined it, while in Islamic law, the limit for giving compensation can be determined according to several models, namely: according to mutual agreement ( at-taqd ī r al-ittif ā qi ); based on the judge's decision ( at-taqd ī r al-qad ā i ), and based on the provisions of the legislature ( at-taqd ī r asy-sy ā r'i ).","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122375353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Policies and Responsibilities of Government Officials during the Covid-19: The Problem of Interpreting the Phrase of Good Faith in Law Number 2 of 2020","authors":"D. Darsinah, Achmad Dardiri Hasyim, Mufrod Teguh Mulyo","doi":"10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ajish.v56i1.1117","url":null,"abstract":": Article 27 Paragraph (2) Law Number 2 of 2020 introduces the term \"good faith\" which forms the basis for the policy of non-prosecution of government officials either criminally or civilly. The good faith phrase has led to public polemics and debates. This article aims to describe the position of Law Number 2 of 2020 as well as the meaning and the concept of \"good faith\" as found in Law No. 2 of 2020 based on the Civil Code. This research utilizes the library method. The research results show that: first, Law Number 2 of 2020 is an adequate legal instrument to provide a strong foundation for the government and related institutions to make certain necessary policies and measures. Second, the good faith phrase as found in Law No. 2 of 2020 can be interpreted and implemented through 4 (four) indicators, namely: (1) there is business; (2) legal guarantees through regulations that are a win-win solution; (3) implementation of regulations that are appropriate and run optimally; and (4) cooperation between all parties.","PeriodicalId":138405,"journal":{"name":"Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130223242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}